Afghanistan: Nothing is Good

4 posts / 0 new

The Security Council did not give Americans any blank check.

The strongest military alliance of the world threatens to break down after eight years of war in Afghanistan.

to read Ludwig Watzal's article published in January 2010, click on

http://la.indymedia.org/news/2010/04/236767.php

demandside's picture
demandside
Joined:
Jul. 31, 2007 3:01 pm

Comments

I think that the chance to create a functional Afghanistan was lost when the Bush administration had targeted Iraq whenthey gained power. I'll ignore the fact that their myopia led them to ignore the Al Qaeda threat, which allowed the attacks on 9/11 to suceed. They purposely kept troops out of Afghanistan so that they would have enough to invade Iraq. Had the focus been on Afghanistan, then perhaps it could have been rebuilt had political solutions been the goal. That didn't happen due to the Bush administration being a neo-conservative regime. Inherently it was built to fail because neo-conservatism is built to fail.

jeffbiss's picture
jeffbiss
Joined:
Jul. 31, 2007 3:01 pm

"Inherently it was built to fail because neo-conservatism is built to fail." Jeff

Failure is in the eyes of the beholder. If you're a defense contractor or a connected politician, the actions in Afghanistan have been very profitable.

Treating 9/11 as a police action, going into Afghanistan and either taking OBL out or having the Taliban hand him over would have ended the raison d'etre for us being in the Middle East for more than a few months.

What chance of making a profit would that have provided?

Allowing OBL to remain free and active has provided a suitable foil to justify obscene military expenditures. 1.5 million dead innocent civilians are just collateral damage, kinda like coal miners.

If the US had gone into Afghanistan immediately after 9/11 and captured/killed OBL, Bush would not have been able to land on an aircraft carrier under a "Mission Accomplished" banner, Haliburton/KBR/Blackwater, etc. would not have become so prominent, and the redistribution of wealth from the working class/poor to the economic royalists would have been stifled...somewhat.

As a purely sociopath profit extraction modality, it was and remains brilliant. As a military action, not so much, and is embarrassingly incompetent.

norske's picture
norske
Joined:
Jul. 31, 2007 3:01 pm

It is all about power and wealth after all.

jeffbiss's picture
jeffbiss
Joined:
Jul. 31, 2007 3:01 pm

Latest Headlines

One Iowa Caucus Delegate Comes Down To Coin Toss

The Iowa caucus convener flipped a coin. Bernie Sanders supporters called "heads" and it landed on tails.

Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton by 31 points in N.H.: Poll

Sanders was at 61 percent support in the University of Massachusetts Lowell/7News poll, followed by Mrs. Clinton, at 30 percent

Martin O'Malley suspends presidential campaign after Iowa caucuses

The announcement came after O'Malley barely registered in Iowa against his better-known rivals Clinton and Sanders, failing to meet already low expectations

Comparing 2016 America to 1972 America Doesn't Work

Bernie Sanders' big win in New Hampshire has given his campaign a big boost, but even Bernie knows that there's still a long primary season ahead.

One of the biggest criticisms about Bernie Sanders, one that I hear frequently from pro-Clinton callers, is that Bernie Sanders could be the next George McGovern.

And it's a serious criticism that's being thrown at Bernie.

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system