Chuck Schumers vote in favor of the Banksters

5 posts / 0 new

I called Schumers office after the show to question his vote to keep the criminal Wall Street banksters big and powerful. The answer I got was that we have to keep our banks big in order to compete with the Europran banks, RPS, Deutsche Bank etc in order to be able to make loans to their customers. My response was, what customers? They don't loan money they gamble and if they lose we pay...WhooHooo. Needless to say I got no response. He kept referring to Bank of America so I guess that is who owns the good senator. When Schumer goes up for re-election I'm going to campaign against him no matter who his opponent is. Response; I'll pass that along.


DaveB's picture
Jul. 31, 2007 4:01 pm


I think that campaign finance reform is the one thing that progressives shoulde focus on more than anything else. if we can get corporate hands off of the peoples government it will create a domino effect that will solve most of our current issues. unfortunately the corporate owned media will never ever touch such a thing. the way to fix that is to have the media financed by taxpayer dollars. but a radical change like that would require campaign finance reform...a real catch 22.

chronix's picture
May. 5, 2010 2:48 am
Quote DaveB:[...] When Schumer goes up for re-election I'm going to campaign against him no matter who his opponent is. Response; I'll pass that along.


Good for you!

If I still lived in New York I would be doing the same. The voting public could bring about a great deal of very important change by simply voting against every senator and representative who voted in favor of the bankers. That would send a powerful message to the Congress.

Unfortunately every problem we have is attributable to the ignorance, complacency and self-serving stupidity of far too many of our fellow citizens. Such as those who vote for people like Bush -- twice.

MikeK's picture
Jul. 31, 2007 4:01 pm

He's in line with Paul Krugman and others on that. Bigness may be OK. I'm still looking at ideas like the one I posted in the economy forum. I think the most important point is not to weaken the bill, instead make it tougher! This is the bill they must get right the first time! If the Dems cave they will lock in the publics perception of a disfunctional Congress.

maraden's picture
Jul. 31, 2007 4:01 pm

...and the Consumer Finance Protection Agency shouldn't be rolled into the Fed...the Fed has a banker constituency. The Fed can veto any actions taken by the Agency.

Probably, Congress should increase the size of the Supreme Court (it has the power to do that and has changed its numbers in the past).

Appoint additional judges to overule the Corporatist twits that have handed the nation over corporate governance.

Retired Monk - "Ideology is a disease"

Jul. 31, 2007 4:01 pm

Latest Headlines

Pulitzer Prize Reporter Exposes Trump’s Lack of Wealth, Mob Ties, Failure to Support Charity, and Much More

Author: K.J. McElrath is a former history and social studies teacher who has long maintained a keen interest in legal and social issues (From:

Taxpayers Fund Yet Another Unneeded Building in Afghanistan

The latest disclosure raises the total for surplus buildings uncovered by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction to nearly $42 million

Hillary Clinton email trove shows concern with Netanyahu's psyche

As US secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton spent plenty of time in daunting foreign territory

Time To Start Treating Guns Like Abortions

It's time we start regulating guns like we regulate abortions.

Because it just makes sense that we regulate these individual rights in the same way.

Because the Supreme Court, in the Heller case, concluded that there is an individual right to own firearms found in the Second Amendment - just like they ruled in Roe v. Wade that there is an individual right to have an abortion found in the Fourth Amendment.

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system