Racist Government Imposed Segregation Laws, Not 2-Year-Old Rand Paul

3 posts / 0 new

Racist Government Imposed Segregation Laws, Not 2-Year-Old Rand Paul


Volitzer's picture
Jul. 31, 2007 3:01 pm


This is why we are responsible for our history and not just our own acts. The issue is the crappy idea that government has no right to regulate commerce. It makes acting out on prejudice protected behavior, and leaves it up to social shunning instead of the law.

If he were a true social libertarian and not a stalking horse for corporate rip and rape, we could have productive policy alignments. If he were just another "small government" Republican, we might find some useful linkages on spending. But as an ideological proponent of public policies that have a terrible track record, he has to answer for it.

Palin thinks that Paul made his support for the Civil Rights Act clear. He has also made clear his hands off approach to GP and to all "private" commerce. Get this clear, "commerce" is a public activity we let private owners engage in. If you want to form a club, have a membership list or even call it a church, you can do all the 'discriminatin' you wish. If you want to put the stars and bars on your windows, black people and real Americans know what to expect.

Because there really is no racism working in America today, what happened before Rand must not matter. Really. The guy is a lightweight and his Dad is only popular for opposing the war. Randi is reading a bunch of his 'newsletters,' and boy do they go into the cracker-barrel with sheets and hoods flying.

DRC's picture
Jul. 31, 2007 3:01 pm

But 47 year old Rand wants to return America to a more racist country. Whether he's a racist or not, I do not presume to know what's in his heart. But when he talks about private business having the civil liberty to practice discrmination AND wanting to transfer as many government services to the private sector, then LEGAL discrmination in fact becomes more rampant. What with the libertarian goal to privatize education, it then becomes institutionalized. And how would 47 year old Rand vote on ENDA? This is still a Civil Rights issue, and Rand made his position clear on the supremacy of private business. So obviously he would defend business' right to fire employees or deny employment to those applicants simply for their sexual orientation. As a matter of fact, his and the libertarian position on marriage equality isn't that he thinks gays should have equal rights (libertarians don't believe in civil rights, they couch it in terms of civil liberties), but that the government shouldn't have the authority to license relationships at all. He and the rest of the libertarians are just "Bizarro Marxists"!

rudolfher's picture
May. 21, 2010 5:37 pm

Latest Headlines

Obama to veto legislation on refugee screening

President Barack Obama would veto a Republican bill introduced in the wake of the Paris attacks to toughen the screening process for Syrian refugees

New York officials: No credible ISIS threat against city

There is no credible threat to New York City at this time, officials said

China denies torturing political prisoners

A Chinese delegation denied mistreatement of prisoners held in police stations and deaths in custody

Why the Kochs Really Embraced Criminal Justice Reform...

It looks like the Koch brothers have scammed us once again.

When news first came out that Charles and David Koch -- the Koch brothers -- were supporting criminal justice reform efforts in Congress, many of us thought, "Wow, they're actually doing something good for once."

And for good reason, too.

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system