The Graph on this Page . . .

1 post / 0 new

hit me like a ton of bricks.It clearly shows what happens to the National Debt (as a % of GDP) when different Presidents are in control of the White House. How clear does this have to be?

Now, juxtapose that graph with this chart for Government spending since around 1910. It shows virtually a flat line with huge spikes for WWI and WWII. (The Clinton and Bush years actually show a decrease in spending. I think we have to assume that this is because spending on the war was off-budget.)

As far as I'm concerned, this speaks to the inevitability of a constant baseline for spending. The cause of deficits is inadequate taxing. (The deficits have not yet reached the level that we Reagan/BushI left us with).

Art's picture
Art
Joined:
Jul. 31, 2007 3:01 pm

Latest Headlines

One Iowa Caucus Delegate Comes Down To Coin Toss

The Iowa caucus convener flipped a coin. Bernie Sanders supporters called "heads" and it landed on tails.

Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton by 31 points in N.H.: Poll

Sanders was at 61 percent support in the University of Massachusetts Lowell/7News poll, followed by Mrs. Clinton, at 30 percent

Martin O'Malley suspends presidential campaign after Iowa caucuses

The announcement came after O'Malley barely registered in Iowa against his better-known rivals Clinton and Sanders, failing to meet already low expectations

If You Want to Win, Go Progressive

The big question right now is whether to call Hillary Clinton a progressive, or a "moderate."

And then there's the question of who is more electable in a general election: an unabashedly progressive democrat, like Bernie Sanders; or a "centrist" democrat, like Hillary Clinton.

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system