An Example of the Right-Wing Noise Machine

7 posts / 0 new

This was a fun little example of how the right-wing noise machine works.

My righty friend sent me this email today. (He sends me a lot of these things. They all look use the exact same type-faces and no doubt come from the same source ).

Socialist Party of America reveals 70 Democrats as belonging to their caucusRick Moran
Two things of note in this revelation. The first is the astonishing number of Democratic House members who not only belong to the Socialist Party of America, but even more incredible, don't mind if people find out about it.

Jim Hoft:

The Socialist Party of America announced in their October 2009 newsletter that 70 Congressional democrats currently belong to their caucus.
This admission was recently posted on Scribd.com:American Socialist Voter-
Q: How many members of the U.S. Congress are also members of the DSA?
A: Seventy
Q: How many of the DSA members sit on the Judiciary Committee?
A: Eleven: John Conyers [Chairman of the Judiciary Committee], Tammy Baldwin, Jerrold Nadler, Luis Gutierrez,
Melvin Watt, Maxine Waters, Hank Johnson, Steve Cohen, Barbara Lee, Robert Wexler, Linda Sanchez [there are 23 Democrats on the Judiciary Committee of which eleven, almost half, are now members of the DSA].
Q: Who are these members of 111th Congress?
A: See the listing below
Co-Chairs
Hon. Raúl M. Grijalva (AZ-07)
Hon. Lynn Woolsey (CA-06)
Vice Chairs
Hon. Diane Watson (CA-33)
Hon. Sheila Jackson-Lee (TX-18)
Hon. Mazie Hirono (HI-02)
Hon. Dennis Kucinich (OH-10)
That's 70 out of 255 Democrats in the House who are avowed socialists. You also wonder how many are still in the closet.
Again, we see the cowardice of these people. If they really had courage, they would run as both Democrats and socialists and be proud of it.

If the RNC were smart - and they're not - they would make an effort to get the facts about these anti-free market congressmen known far and wide. And what these Democrats have signed on to by being members of the Socialist Party of America is quite plain.
From the Preamble of the SPA:
We are socialists because we reject an international economic order sustained by private profit, alienated labor, race and gender discrimination, environmental destruction, and brutality and violence in defense of the status quo.We are socialists because we share a vision of a humane international social order based both on democratic planning and market mechanisms to achieve equitable distribution of resources,meaningful work, a healthy environment, sustainable growth, gender and racial equality, and non-oppressive relationships.
Note that some of what they stand for is boilerplate from both Democrats and Republicans. It is their "vision" of a "humane social order" that is based on the "equitable distribution of resources" among other nonsense that sets the socialists apart from rational people.
An examination of that list would tell you that the overwhelming majority of those Democrats are from extremely safe districts so its not like a revelation like this would mean their political careers are over. But it is still shocking to know that 20 years after the fall of Communism, so many lawmakers would still be enamored of such a spectacularly failed economic and social system.

Update: Steve Gilbert writes:

Not to nitpick, but this "announcement" is at most a change of terminology (maybe due to Beck's demonization of 'Progressive').

For this Socialist Party Caucus is just the Congressional Progressive Caucus, which has been a part of the Socialist Party since Bernie Saunders started it in 1991:
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6497
So there might have been a name change. Or this might have just been a slip of the pen.
From the Discover The Networks link above: "Until 1999, the Progressive Caucus website was hosted by the Democratic Socialists of America. After the press reported on this link, the connections suddenly vanished from both organizations' websites."
As DTN also points out, the Progressive Caucus works hand in glove with George Soros funded 'Progressive Challenge,' which is a project of the hard left Institute for Policy Studies.

I decided to Google one of the longer phrases and found over two pages of right-wing blogs and "news" sources parroting the exact same content in its exact same wording. Snopes hasn't researched this one yet.

Art's picture
Art
Joined:
Jul. 31, 2007 4:01 pm

Comments

QUOTE: "We are socialists because we reject an international economic order sustained by private profit, alienated labor, race and gender discrimination, environmental destruction, and brutality and violence in defense of the status quo"

poly replies: Wow. I guess that means the majority of Americans are socialists. According to the recent Wall St. Journal poll...the majority are against all of that just as the socialists are...and are fed up that it continues.

Are conservatives trying to get recruits for the socialist party...by making their platform public? It's probably a case of Republicans being out of touch when they label what most consider good goals as being bad..

If they were smart, they'd continue to hide the socialist platform under a carpet like they used to..

Retired Monk - "Ideology is a disease".

polycarp2
Joined:
Jul. 31, 2007 4:01 pm

Even more fun, I checked out some links. The email contained a link tagged "Jim Hoff". That took us to some site called Gateway pundit, which I guess is supposed to be a source authority. This site contained a link tagged "announced", which takes us to this website, the site of "American Socialist Voter", which debunks the original message quite nicely. Ah, those pesky links.

Art's picture
Art
Joined:
Jul. 31, 2007 4:01 pm

Portal:Front_groups are common. Right now Pete Peterson has weaseled his way into the deficit commission through a few organizations supposedly separate and independant. Ads will be coming soon, from 'responsible' groups...Responsible is the key word.

douglaslee's picture
douglaslee
Joined:
Jul. 31, 2007 4:01 pm
  • America's PAC, a conservative political action committee, has one of the top ten election-season advertisers in American markets, featuring vitriolic attack ads that attempt to discourage African-Americans from voting at all. Using a group that is not formally affiliated with the Republican Party to engage in negative campaigning is a tactic designed to minimize public backlash against this type of negative campaigning.
  • The American Center for Voting Rights actually campaigned to make it harder for Americans to vote, under the guise of preventing "voter fraud."
  • Funded by the chemical and food industries, the American Council on Science and Health campaigns to defend sugar, pesticides and chemical additives in foods.

The Discovery Institute [I think] was the name used to front for creationism against evolution, even got the oxymoronic term creation science in the public lexicon, at least on fox.

douglaslee's picture
douglaslee
Joined:
Jul. 31, 2007 4:01 pm

Name-calling is cheap.

In fact, if we taxed name-calling, the right-wing would shut up forever.

TAX NAME-CALLING! THE NEW CONFISCATORY TAX.

Why does Newt Gingrich always look like he just finished picking his nose?

http://www.costofwar.com/

kwikfix
Joined:
Apr. 9, 2010 1:51 pm

I'm not concerned about the right wing noise machine.

I'm more concerned about the fake left wing media that make people think the "center-right" is "left-wing".

Some of these fake left winger are NPR (on top of the list) followed by the rightwing media that acts as if they are unbiased CNN, NBC, CBS, etc.

Rodriguez's picture
Rodriguez
Joined:
Jul. 31, 2007 4:01 pm

Currently Chatting

Our kids are counting on us to reverse austerity.

According to UNICEF, even in the world's richest countires, children remain “the most enduring victims” of the recession. In the last six years, 2.6 million more kids have fallen below the poverty line, and more than half of them live right here in the United States.

Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system