State Nullification: Requisite To Freedom by Chuck Baldwin

6 posts / 0 new

State Nullification: Requisite To Freedom by Chuck Baldwin

I was thrilled to see J.B. Williams report in NewsWithViews.com that the State of Montana has a broad-based State nullification bill currently proposed in its legislature. Derek Skees (R-Whitefish) is the State legislator who has introduced this much-needed legislation.

See the story at:

http://www.newswithviews.com:80/JBWilliams/williams130.htm

The fact is, Skees’ State Nullification bill is only one of several outstanding freedom-first bills that is currently before the Montana legislature. I urge readers to go to PolyMontana.com to look at the many other fine pieces of pro-freedom legislation pending in the Montana State legislature:

http://polymontana.com/legislators/freedom-bills/

Unfortunately, one of those very fine bills has already been defeated: the “Sheriffs First” bill sponsored by Senator Greg Hinkle (R-Thompson Falls). This bill is long overdue and absolutely necessary to prevent federal usurpation of State and local law enforcement. That the Montana legislature failed to pass this bill indicates just how necessary it is to elect State legislators who truly understand constitutional government. I urge readers to read the following defense of the Sheriffs First law, written by my son, Constitutional Attorney Tim Baldwin:

http://tinyurl.com/4aclefs

Look through the list of the other freedom bills presently before the Montana State legislature and one will instantly recognize the potential for this State to stand at the “tip of the spear” in the reclamation and restoration of State sovereignty, freedom, and independence. (Plus, it reinforces why my family and I made the life-changing decision to move to this beautiful and wonderful State.)

For example, there is a bill to nullify federal health care laws; a bill to eliminate the misapplication of the 14th amendment to the US Constitution; a bill to nullify the Endangered Species Act; a bill to authorize permit-less Concealed Carry; a bill to transfer management of certain federal lands; a bill to provide the State eminent domain authority for federal lands; and, of course, the Sheriffs First act, which would have required the Sheriff’s authorization for federal law enforcement agencies to conduct arrests, searches, and seizures.

I would dare say: if you are a freedom-minded individual, goose bumps ran up your spine just from reading the above summary. I got goose bumps simply writing about it. Can one imagine the kind of freedom that would be unleashed in this great State should even a handful of these bills actually become law? And think of the numbers of other State legislatures that would quickly follow suit (especially here in the West) should any State legislature pass and a State governor sign these kinds of freedom protections into law!

This is why I keep insisting that, if freedom has a chance to survive in these United States, the American people must get their eyes off of Washington, D.C., and start focusing on their individual states. The authority and power to properly defend liberty has always rested with the states. I’m not saying we should not be concerned about who our US representatives and senators are–or who is elected President. I am saying, however, that freedom will never be restored from inside the Beltway. It is State independence, resolve, and nullification that will ultimately preserve and protect our liberties. And, as the creators of the US Constitution acknowledged, State nullification is absolutely requisite to freedom’s survival.

And, fortunately, Montana is not the only State with freedom-loving men and women in its legislature. I am hearing of lawmakers in states such as Oklahoma and Virginia (and several others) who are introducing similar freedom bills in their respective State legislatures. The question is, as always, will the people of these states get behind their brave legislators and help them get these freedom bills passed? If they are preoccupied with watching the major television network news channels (that focus almost entirely on national and international politics), they will not even know that these freedom bills are being proposed (most local media ignore them, too), and, therefore, will be totally inactive and ineffective in helping to restore the freedoms they claim to love.

I repeat: if freedom is to have a new birth in America, we must stop focusing on Washington, D.C., and start focusing on our individual states! I cannot overstate it: liberty will be won or lost at the State level!

http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/?p=3049 actual link to article.

Rebelitarian's picture
Rebelitarian
Joined:
Nov. 15, 2010 1:40 pm

Comments

LIBERTY WILL BE WON OR LOST AT THE TELLER'S WINDOW! ENFRANCHISEMENT AT THE BALLOT BOX IS MEANINGLESS WITHOUT THE FRANCHISE AT THE TELLER'S WINDOW. POVERTY AND WANT ARE THE PRECURSORS OF REBELLION, NOT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.STATES RIGHTS AS AN ISSUE SHOULD HAVE BEEN SETTLED AT THE END OF THE CIVIL WAR, BUT THE NEO-CONFEDERATE MINDSET PERSISTS. THE ONLY GOOD THING ABOUT STATES' RIGHTS THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IGNORES IS POSSE COMMITATUS.AS TO ALL THE REST, I HEAR THE DISTANT TWANG OF BANJOES...

Ulysses's picture
Ulysses
Joined:
Jul. 31, 2007 3:01 pm

Shades of John C. Calhoun.

I'm fairly certain that the nullification debate was settled at Appomattox Courthouse in 1865.

Nguarorerue's picture
Nguarorerue
Joined:
Jan. 11, 2011 12:44 pm
Quote Nguarorerue:

Shades of John C. Calhoun.

I'm fairly certain that the nullification debate was settled at Appomattox Courthouse in 1865.

Not really, the states still have the 10th Amendment and can nullify any law the Feds pass that is un-Constittuional.

You best consult a history book buddy.

Rebelitarian's picture
Rebelitarian
Joined:
Nov. 15, 2010 1:40 pm
Quote Rebelitarian:
Quote Nguarorerue:

Shades of John C. Calhoun.

I'm fairly certain that the nullification debate was settled at Appomattox Courthouse in 1865.

Not really, the states still have the 10th Amendment and can nullify any law the Feds pass that is un-Constittuional.

You best consult a history book buddy.

Deliverance...

Ulysses's picture
Ulysses
Joined:
Jul. 31, 2007 3:01 pm
Quote Rebelitarian:

Not really, the states still have the 10th Amendment and can nullify any law the Feds pass that is un-Constittuional.

You best consult a history book buddy.

State governments may not stand in judgment of the constitutionality of acts by the federal government. Five-hundred thousand Americans died to settle that matter.

I draw your attention to Article I, Section 8, paragraph 18, the so-called "elastic clause," of the Constitution. I also draw your attention to the enabling clauses of the 13th, 14th, 15th, and 16th amendments to the Constitution.

Nguarorerue's picture
Nguarorerue
Joined:
Jan. 11, 2011 12:44 pm

Currently Chatting

The world we're leaving for today's teens...

Without immediate global action on climate change, today's teenagers will be forced to live with the consequences of our inaction. The World Bank has issued their third report of climate change, and it says that global temperatures could rise by as much as 4 degrees Celsius by the time today's teens hit their 80th birthday.

Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system