Determining whether or not a property violation ocurred and to what extent would be the purpose of arbitration. In short, I believe that such decision would be made by the courts under anacap. The difference would be that no single court would have a legal monoopoly. The goal is the same as under our current court system however: equitable adjudication of property rights violations.
I think that an anacap would argue that there is a difference between forcing someone to stop violationg your property and forcibly violating another's property. I don't think that anacaps oppose protective force. I even believe they recognize the need to use force to recover stolen property.
Not sure about this. Hopefully we can discuss this further.
Frank, you're overworked and underpaid! I think you need to hire a staff to answer ah2's questions! I'll try to help out as time allows...