Earth to Teabagger!

On July 23, 2016, we discontinued our forums. We ask our members to please join us in our new community site, The Hartmann Report. Please note that you will have to register a new account on The Hartmann Report.

1 post / 0 new

I got a kick out of this letter to the editor of a local newspaper. OK, nobody will disagree, especially in Illinois, that government could shrink a little. But methinks the great Teabagger puppeteers have something else in mind! Just more evidence that the teabaggers have been fooled:

<em>I am one of the many hardworking taxpayers who say we pay enough taxes. I am also one of the many hardworking taxpayers who say we do not want our elected officials to reduce the entitlement programs that actually help our fellow citizens.
The problem is the definition of "smaller government." By smaller government, we mean fewer elected officials, not reduced regulations or benefits!
Each city or village has its local officials, with staffs, offices, expense accounts, health benefits that most of us could never afford on our own and ridiculous pensions. Multiply this by the county level, state level and federal level, and the problem becomes obvious.
We the taxpayers simply can no longer afford to support the "ruling aristocracy" that our elected officials have created.</em>

I am one of the many hardayers who

al3's picture
Jul. 31, 2007 4:01 pm

Carbon Tax... Where Should We Start?

In Washington State a fierce debate has erupted over a ballot measure aimed at fighting climate change. As the reality of runaway climate change continues to sink in, the question of what do about it gets even more pressing.

We are not just dealing with the possibility of a few hotter days there - or a few nastier thunderstorms there.

Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system