Why is Oregon So Progressive?

On July 23, 2016, we discontinued our forums. We ask our members to please join us in our new community site, The Hartmann Report. Please note that you will have to register a new account on The Hartmann Report.

1 post / 0 new

This Wikipedia article describes some of the political milestones that took place in the 20th century. We locals are well aware that, during the earlier half of the century, Oregon was a home for the KKK and that many of Government's more memorable characterers were Conservatives. Sometime around the middle of the century, we started getting politicians like Wayne Morse, followed by Republicans like Mark Hatfield and Tom McCall. (These would be called Socialists or Communists by today's Republicans). What happened?

One thing that stuck out to me was that around the turn of the century, the State started getting landmark laws with a "populist" emphasis. Oregon was the first state, for instance, to have an intitative and referendum. That is, The people were beginning to put some strings on Government's power. Now, the word "populist" has taken on a murkey meaning. The Tea Partiers think that they are populists, and the OWS people are certainly populist. Populism cannot, at this time, be equated with "Progressivism", although, I suspect that if the liberals are able to claim the label as their own, the Tea Partiers will quickly find a way to demonize the label. This is all incidental to the main question I am asking.

How did Oregon get to be the way it is, and what does that protend for the larger picture of America?

Art's picture
Art
Joined:
Jul. 31, 2007 4:01 pm

Yet More Tribal Land Under Threat

The battle lines for the next fight to protect sacred tribal lands are being drawn in Bears Ears in Southeastern Utah.

Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system