GOD!!!!!

53 posts / 0 new
Last post
TChamp3121
TChamp3121's picture

I'm sure this word has gotten all you liberal's attention!! GOD!!  OMG!!  To dare to utter this word!  Hsssssssss!  Hair stands on end!   The EVIL hypocrytes who mention this!  Hsssssssss! 

Why do you all hate GOD so much?  I think that people equate GOD with the imperfect church.  And if the Church is imperfect, so is GOD.  But GOD looks to all of us to be a part of HIS church.  To work towards the perfection of Jesus, knowing that we can't attain it.  But, we can try.  And in trying, we become so much better people.  We can't attain what Jesus attained (because of original sin),  but we can approach it.

I'm sure this offends many of you.  Mainly because of our ego's.  How dare we place another man above us!  No mere mortal is better than me (though Jesus was not a mere mortal so the scriptures say)!   

So why do liberals hate GOD so much?  Well, I think that liberals are very much a part of GOD's kindom.  And, I believe they advance his work so very much.  What is so disturbing to me is that while doing this, they still would rather take resposibility for a parking ticket more than accept Jesus/GOD as having anything to do with anything in their life!  And that is so very sad.  How sad is it to walk an old lady accross the street one minute, and then spit in GOD's face the next!! 

THIS is the ego of man!  WE our our own self centered universe.  No need for GOD, as we have it all figured out;  thank you!  "GOD, go f**k yourself.  I don't need you!"  "Can handle this all on my own"!  "  Got it figured out!".

Liberals have the good conscience of GOD ingrained in them, as all men;  the noble call to action.  But yet in spite of this, they will not accept a creator as the resposible party for this attitude in themselves.  No, no!  This comes from them, and them alone.  How arrogent!  How egotystical!  They view themselves as the almiighy one;  power to judge with impunity! 

I love the progressive cause.  But, withouth GOD as a moral compass, they bocome mere extensions of the personal ego.  Humble thyselves before the LORD, and look for his wisdon. 

Don't confuse the imperfection of the chuch and it's people, with the message of GOD!  YOU are a part of it.  But, no matter how much good work you may do, to disavow GOD would discredit anything and everything you may do.  YOU are not your own GODS!  Don't let your ego get the better of you!

Respectfully, 

THunt3121

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

Bush_Wacker
Bush_Wacker's picture
No offense taken.

No offense taken.

mdhess
mdhess's picture
You begin your rant with "Why

You begin your rant with "Why do you all hate GOD so much?" and finish with "Respectfully," - so which is it, vitriol or respect? How do you know how anybody else feels about God?  You evangelical zealots should heed Luke, chapter 8, versus 4-18.  When you are certain you can pass that scrutiny (and you can be civil) then come talk to me.  Otherwise piss off.

TChamp3121
TChamp3121's picture
I just find that there are

I just find that there are some progressives that have a lot of contempt for "GOD".  I am not an evangelical zealot, otherwise I would not be a big fan of Thomm.  I consider myself a conservative progressive.  I love the progressive movement, as I feel it is for and of the people;  a democratic cause;  a human rights cause;  a way to better the lives of the common man and in doing so better the state of the world.  I love it.  Does this motive come from GOD?  I believe so.  Where I make my departure is from that portion of progressives that actually really, really hate GOD, an anyone that believes in GOD (mostly atheists).  I find that so disrespectful.  I don't shove GOD down anybodys thoat!  Perhaps that is an evangelical thing.  But as a Catholic, quite frankly I do not feel the need to ram anything down anybody's thoat.  People have the right to believe in whatever they want, so long as is doesn't harm others.  I have a lot of faith in GOD and believe it is an underlying motive behind all good works.  But I would never, NEVER force my views on anyone that is not interested. 

There is a big misunderstanding of Christianity.  I believe it's because there are soooo many groups out there that claim to be Christians, when they really aren't.  As I said before, I am a Catholic, and many of these so called Christian's are quite different from Roman Catholic doctrine.  I really wish I could pass on the word of GOD through contemporary catholic (vatican II) beliefs.  I think many people would be really surprised at what they find.  But, they don't look beyond what they want to see.  And, they don't see that much of what our society is today is a reflection of these beliefs.  And that I find very ignorant and reprehensible! 

You know, there is a balance between conservativism and progressivisim.  Somewhere inbetween lies the TRUTH.  To get too far one way or the other is a perversion of the TRUTH.  GOD is the TRUTH in my opinion, and is the source of all good things. 

 Let's keep up the good work.  Let's pray to GOD that we can suceed in advansing the cause of human rights against the tyranny and  oppression of the ever increasing state of Fascism in the United States.  Let's restore this country to "....one nation, under GOD, whith liberty and Justice for all"!  

GOD help us, and be strong my brothers and sisters in Christ!  Together with GOD we can overcome this.  

 

 

Sincerley, God bless you all! 

 

 

 

Bush_Wacker
Bush_Wacker's picture
In the imortal words of

In the imortal words of somebody ( I can't remember )  I have no problem with God, it's religion that really pisses me off.

TChamp3121
TChamp3121's picture
Bush Wacker, So great for you

Bush Wacker,

So great for you to respond.  I know I threw a lot out there.  And, I understand your suspicion of religion.  That is not a bad thing.  It is a dangerous world out there.  But, if someone is really strong in themselves, they should not be afraid to explore.  A cult will not draw you in and put you in a transe if you are a weak person, as I supect you are not. 

I am biased, because I am a Roman Catholic.  I believe that the Roman Catholic church is the one true church of christ, not out of ego, but through a study of the life of Christ.  I am fully aware of the sins that it has committed though the last two thousand years, as the pope John paul II has admitted.  The sins that it has committed with the crusades, the inquisition, the priests molesting children is reprehensible. And believe me, the members of the church are aware of this, and definelty do not like it.  But, we will fix it and restore it to where it should be.  It is not a one way street, where we all bow to the Pope, no questions asked.  The members of the church have an integral role in the church.  Without them there would be no church.  No intelligent spiritual person is going to follow things that don't make sense and are against our God given instincts. 

The reason I am a proponent for the church is because christ said that where more than one person prays to me, you will find me.  He said to peter, you are a rock.  On you I will build my church.

Jesus set up the original church of God.  This church is no more perfect than his diciples were.  Remember all the sins that his diciples commited.  Peter denied him three times,  Judas delivered him to the Romans and the pharisees, and Thomas doubted him upon his resurection from the dead.  And all of his diciples died very badly for believing in him; skinned alive, crucified upside down...etc.

For all those people that so distrust the Church, I really encourage them to take a deeper look.  Christians have been persecuted around the world, throughout the ages for their beliefs.  And yet, despite this, Gods word continues.  In fact, the more they are persecuted, the more followers are created.  We enjoy so many benefits here in the U.S., and in Europe due to Judeo/Christian values, much of which is taken for granted. 

So, by all means;  be suspicious of religion.  For as christ said..."there will be many false prophets" (and of course false religions).  "But, you will know me through my works". 

So I would say to you;  don't discredit all religions becasue they are are called religions.  I would encourage you to take a closer look at religion as part of a process of seeking the truth to mans existense.  You don't need to start with Catholicism. Take a look at all of them.  Weigh them out for yourself.  Seek the truth, and pray to God for it.  If there is a God, he will lead you in the right direction.  And, your life will be so very full with understanding and peace.

Bush_Wacker
Bush_Wacker's picture
Sorry TChamp but I've been

Sorry TChamp but I've been down that road many years ago.  I learned that most of the people I met in church were the first one's to judge others by race, sex, orientation, belief systems and even poverty.  When those that preach the teachings of Jesus or Buddah or any other keeper of the soul don't practice what they preach it makes everything about it counterfeit.  I have come to believe that if you personally believe in a God then a God exists.  Perception is reality on a personal level only.  If you believe in God then I wish that all your prayers come true and you live a wonderful and fulfilling life until you are called into your heaven.  Peace brother.

TChamp3121
TChamp3121's picture
I get where you are at.  But,

I get where you are at.  But, if you should ever want to come out of the wilderness of being on your own, and re-join others in your beliefs, I'm sure you will be welcome back.

Keep the faith.

douglaslee
douglaslee's picture
Is being crucified upside

Is being crucified upside down worse than right side up? A bible poster here in the past was outraged that the jihadists were beheading with a rusty knife. Personally, I don't think it makes much difference. But the US DOES use sterilized needles in THEIR executions, part of that judeo/christian advance you were talking about.

TChamp3121
TChamp3121's picture
Doug, So what you're saying

Doug,

So what you're saying is that Christians are no better than Muslims?  They kill by the sword, but Christians kill more cleverly with lethal injection?  No difference!?

What is so very interesting regarding the Judeo-Christion model vs. the Islamic model is the level of tolerance for each other.  Muslims can come to this country an be free to practice there religion without persecution,  yet Christians go to their county and are beheaded for having a bible or crusifix with them!  Dude, you are so F***ing stupid!  Have you been out ouf this country!?  I have!  I am an engineer and have worked in Saudi Arabia, in a corporate US/Saudi compound!  Let me tell you, those people are RADICAL!!!!...exclamation point!!!   Alcohol....prison/death!  Pornography...same!   Speaking against Islam......apostopy and death!!!!   These people do not F**k around.  Don't even think to equate Islam with Christianity!!  

We should send all you f***ing people to various Islamic country's, and then check back with you in a year.  I think you all would have a different opinion about your values and allegiences.  You know, it is so easy to speak intellectually about respect for all and self criticism to bring all peoples together;  and I totally agree with this because as a Chrisitian this is what we believe in.  BUT,.....THEY DON'T!!!!  Let me make this very clear.....THEY DON'T!!!!   To them,  we are all infidels!!  THESE PEOPLE ARE F***ing  CRAZY!!!   Christians are passive little lambs compared to them. 

For all you people out there that agree with Doug,  I hope you all suffer the same death as our expatriots that have been kidnapped and beheaded....all those lovely Muslims that are sooooo respectul of life!   You people make me SICK!!!!  You just don't get it!!!  Christianity and Islam are worlds apart!  The only reason that Muslims here are peaceful is because they are operating in an atmosphere of tolerance created by Christians!  

TChamp3121
TChamp3121's picture
For all those non-muslims

For all those non-muslims that side with the Muslims and think Christians are different but the same, check out this link. 

http://bcove.me/07uefz8c

 

KirkRobinson
fear vs love - it all comes

fear vs love - it all comes down to that . I love the religion of Jesus and fear the religion about Jesus. Substitute Jesus for deity of choice. Rinse, repeat.
...and acts like Diego de Landa burning the Mayan libraries in 1562 make for somber history classes.

MEJ
MEJ's picture
Jesus is okay, but his fan

Jesus is okay, but his fan club is full of crazies.

God save us from your "believers".

Laborisgood
Laborisgood's picture
TChamp3121 wrote: For all

TChamp3121 wrote:

For all those non-muslims that side with the Muslims and think Christians are different but the same, check out this link. 

http://bcove.me/07uefz8c

 

T-Champ:

I actually suffered though most of this insufferable pandering to the Right on this link.  Do you suppose any of our national actions since 9-11 might have anything to do with the proliferation of homegrown terrorists?  Do you find this "testimonial" to be that much more credible because an Arab woman is saying it?  Suppose we chose a more subtle approach to dealing with the cultivation of terrorism in Afghanistan as well as never entering Iraq under false pretenses?  These homegrown terrorists are a direct result of our actions, not our inactions.

MEJ:

You are right about the members of the Jesus fan club who line up behind this crap.  There are far too many, but it is by no means a consensus in terms of Islam, Climate Change or Mammon Worship in spite of the appearance of an epidemic of crazies in the fan club.  I'm not sure if Jesus would weep or be really pissed off at the success rate of the Right to infiltrate so many of these Jesus fan clubs and get them to act contrary to all of His teachings.

TChamp3121
TChamp3121's picture
Labor, you don't know

Labor, you don't know anything about Christianity.  Your opinion is based on perverted attitudes and actions of people that claim to be Christians,  but are far from it.  

Christian attitude did not cause 9/11.  Look back through history.  The nation of Islam has hated Christians from it's inception!  It was founded in about the 6th century by Mohamad, who claimed to be the last and highest prophet of God (Allah for them).  His parents died at an early age, and he traveled with his uncle on a caravan through Persia.  In his early life he learned of the concept of monotheism through various tribes through the trade routes.  Christianity had traveled to this area through word of mouth, but was not complete.  In other words, they had an incomplete account of the religion.  

Mohamad filled in the gaps on his own accord.  He married a woman that was thirty years his senior.  He had several kids with her.  Then, he holed up in a cave where he claimed to have had dreams/visions from God.  He went to Mecca, preached from the street corners from encouragement from his wife (Mother figure), and was chased out of the City upon fear of death.  He fled, formed an army of followers, and came back to wage war.  He won, and his religeon took root.  The Curan lacks continuity in terms of timeline's of events. 

To the Muslims, Jesus was just another prophet.  Mohamed claimed himself to be above Jesus, and the true elightened one of God. They believe that Jesus never really died on the cross;  that it just appeared that he did;  some sort of magical trick of Allah, and that it was possibly Judas in his place.

Christians believe that Jesus was the Son of God;  e.g. God and man.  The religion claims that Jesus performed miracles;  e.g.  healed the sick, and was raised from the dead.  If one believes this is true, then one could believe that Jesus was the messiah.  If one does not believe this to be true, then all other religions are equal choices.  In the end, I guess it comes down to what one chooses to believe.

There is no scientific proof for the existenc of God, Allah or anything else for that matter.  These are questions of faith.  But, what is faith?  What leads us to this, and how is it determined?  Is it a matter of conditioning?  Is it an individual quest?  Or, a bit of both?

Since one can't proove the existence of God, people have asked me "what makes you believe in God?"  The only answer I can give is that I have seen the proof for the existence of God through a personal relationship with God.  What this means is that I Pray, I get results.  If I don't get the result I pray for, I still get results.  They are not what I prayed for, but they are still good for me.  God leads me through life.  If I choose to walk with Him, I learn, I become a better person, and overall I do better.  This is why Christians believe that there is personal relationship with God, not the inpersonal relationship other religions purport. 

This may seem like a wierd sort of self fulfilling prophesy.  I agree!  It really is very illogical.  when I hear myself say these things, I tell myself you're a wacko! And, that's just it.  

I can't proove it.  If it were obvious, it would not be faith. Why do we need faith?  It seems that this is the test for the original separation between God and man.  In the bible, man turns his back on God (Eden).  It take the willful act of man reaching toward God as an act of faith.  And, Christ has reconciled man to God through his act of dying on the cross.

I have peuked out a lot here.  Really, it is too much to grasp in this short blurb.  Many have studied through Centuries on this matter.    This is why I say to all those naysayers, that there is so very much here that they don't know about, and really need to take a closer look at.  

In summary, it would be lovely to think that all the peoples around this wonderful world respect the opinions of all others and live and let live.  People in the U.S. can only have a concept of this through Christian values.  The rest of the religions around the world do not allow this level of introspection.  It is allowed only through the ultimate quest for the TRUTH; of which the lens of christianity provides.  All other religeons close that window.  

For all those that hate Christianity, I ask you what about it do you hate?  My guess is the authoritarian dogma;  the perceived nontion of control.  I ask you, do you not suffer under the control of the government?,,,of the rules of the corporations that employ you?...of the laws of society?.

Whether we admit it or not, we are all under the influence of pressures from authority.  My question to you is "to which authority will you surrender?"  Who really cares about you?  Anyone?

..."give unto Ceaser what belongs to Ceaser.  And give undo God what belongs to God."

I could really care less about evangelising God to all you schmucks that have nothing but contempt for Him.  And I hope you all get what you deserve!  All those that hate God should have the hairs stand up on the back of your necks for this post.  You people have are so self righteous and have cold hearts.  I do not have the authority to judge you, for I am a sinner myself;  many times over.  But, the difference between you and me is that while we are both sinners, I believe and you don't.  You are self centered contemptuous bastards, just like Mr. Labor here.

Labor, just like you've told me so many times before F**ck You!!!  You are an ingnorant slime ball!!  A man with no humility!!  A man without purpose in his life;   a man that has Contempt for God and all those that believe in Him!!!  I pity you, and the majority of all you Liberal bastards on this website, as I know you all sympathise with him. 

 

 

 

 

FoodForAll
FoodForAll's picture
Epicurus old questions are

Epicurus old questions are still unanswered:

Is God wiling to prevent evil but not able? Then he or she is impotent.

Is he or she able but not willing? Then he or she is malevolent.

Is he or she both able and willing?  Whence, then, evil?

Calperson
Calperson's picture
FoodForAll wrote: Epicurus

FoodForAll wrote:

Epicurus old questions are still unanswered:

Is God wiling to prevent evil but not able? Then he or she is impotent.

Is he or she able but not willing? Then he or she is malevolent.

Is he or she both able and willing?  Whence, then, evil?

These old questions actually have been long answered by anyone who seeks it. The problem you appear to be having is that you are viewing God and Evil as a duopoly, as two seperate things.

They are in fact the same thing!

Ask yourself does Cold exists? Actually Cold does not exist. According to the laws of Physics, what we consider cold, in fact is the absence of heat. Anything is able to be studied as long as it transmits energy (heat). Absolute Zero is the total absence of heat, but cold does not exist. What we have done is create a term to describe how we feel if we don't have body heat or we are not hot."

In the same manner does Darkness does not exist either. Darkness is in fact simply the absence of light. Light can be studied, darkness can not. Darkness cannot be broken down. A simple ray of light tears the darkness and illuminates the surface where the light beam finishes. Dark is a term that we humans have created to describe what happens when there's lack of light."

It is wrong to blame Evil on God. Evil is perpertrated by man and man alone. Just as in the previous cases, Evil is a term which man has created to describe the result of the absence of God's presence in the hearts of man."

God does not allow Evil, Men DO Evil by increasing their distance from God.

mdhess
mdhess's picture
So our evil comes from the

So our evil comes from the absence of God's presence in the hearts of man? Why did God make us flawed? The problem with superstition is that it always comes down to blind acceptance.  You really don't want me to start taking apart the Christ myth because when you begin to unravel all the pieces that the Church has invented to keep the story solvent it really makes Christians appear to be utter lunatics.

Laborisgood
Laborisgood's picture
TChamp3121 wrote: Labor, you

TChamp3121 wrote:

Labor, you don't know anything about Christianity.  Your opinion is based on perverted attitudes and actions of people that claim to be Christians,  but are far from it.  

Christian attitude did not cause 9/11.  Look back through history.  The nation of Islam has hated Christians from it's inception!  It was founded in about the 6th century by Mohamad, who claimed to be the last and highest prophet of God (Allah for them).  His parents died at an early age, and he traveled with his uncle on a caravan through Persia.  In his early life he learned of the concept of monotheism through various tribes through the trade routes.  Christianity had traveled to this area through word of mouth, but was not complete.  In other words, they had an incomplete account of the religion.  

Mohamad filled in the gaps on his own accord.  He married a woman that was thirty years his senior.  He had several kids with her.  Then, he holed up in a cave where he claimed to have had dreams/visions from God.  He went to Mecca, preached from the street corners from encouragement from his wife (Mother figure), and was chased out of the City upon fear of death.  He fled, formed an army of followers, and came back to wage war.  He won, and his religeon took root.  The Curan lacks continuity in terms of timeline's of events. 

To the Muslims, Jesus was just another prophet.  Mohamed claimed himself to be above Jesus, and the true elightened one of God. They believe that Jesus never really died on the cross;  that it just appeared that he did;  some sort of magical trick of Allah, and that it was possibly Judas in his place.

Christians believe that Jesus was the Son of God;  e.g. God and man.  The religion claims that Jesus performed miracles;  e.g.  healed the sick, and was raised from the dead.  If one believes this is true, then one could believe that Jesus was the messiah.  If one does not believe this to be true, then all other religions are equal choices.  In the end, I guess it comes down to what one chooses to believe.

There is no scientific proof for the existenc of God, Allah or anything else for that matter.  These are questions of faith.  But, what is faith?  What leads us to this, and how is it determined?  Is it a matter of conditioning?  Is it an individual quest?  Or, a bit of both?

Since one can't proove the existence of God, people have asked me "what makes you believe in God?"  The only answer I can give is that I have seen the proof for the existence of God through a personal relationship with God.  What this means is that I Pray, I get results.  If I don't get the result I pray for, I still get results.  They are not what I prayed for, but they are still good for me.  God leads me through life.  If I choose to walk with Him, I learn, I become a better person, and overall I do better.  This is why Christians believe that there is personal relationship with God, not the inpersonal relationship other religions purport. 

This may seem like a wierd sort of self fulfilling prophesy.  I agree!  It really is very illogical.  when I hear myself say these things, I tell myself you're a wacko! And, that's just it.  

I can't proove it.  If it were obvious, it would not be faith. Why do we need faith?  It seems that this is the test for the original separation between God and man.  In the bible, man turns his back on God (Eden).  It take the willful act of man reaching toward God as an act of faith.  And, Christ has reconciled man to God through his act of dying on the cross.

I have peuked out a lot here.  Really, it is too much to grasp in this short blurb.  Many have studied through Centuries on this matter.    This is why I say to all those naysayers, that there is so very much here that they don't know about, and really need to take a closer look at.  

In summary, it would be lovely to think that all the peoples around this wonderful world respect the opinions of all others and live and let live.  People in the U.S. can only have a concept of this through Christian values.  The rest of the religions around the world do not allow this level of introspection.  It is allowed only through the ultimate quest for the TRUTH; of which the lens of christianity provides.  All other religeons close that window.  

For all those that hate Christianity, I ask you what about it do you hate?  My guess is the authoritarian dogma;  the perceived nontion of control.  I ask you, do you not suffer under the control of the government?,,,of the rules of the corporations that employ you?...of the laws of society?.

Whether we admit it or not, we are all under the influence of pressures from authority.  My question to you is "to which authority will you surrender?"  Who really cares about you?  Anyone?

..."give unto Ceaser what belongs to Ceaser.  And give undo God what belongs to God."

I could really care less about evangelising God to all you schmucks that have nothing but contempt for Him.  And I hope you all get what you deserve!  All those that hate God should have the hairs stand up on the back of your necks for this post.  You people have are so self righteous and have cold hearts.  I do not have the authority to judge you, for I am a sinner myself;  many times over.  But, the difference between you and me is that while we are both sinners, I believe and you don't.  You are self centered contemptuous bastards, just like Mr. Labor here.

Labor, just like you've told me so many times before F**ck You!!!  You are an ingnorant slime ball!!  A man with no humility!!  A man without purpose in his life;   a man that has Contempt for God and all those that believe in Him!!!  I pity you, and the majority of all you Liberal bastards on this website, as I know you all sympathise with him. 

Lent is just around the corner.  We all have much to examine about ourselves.  Do our actions reflect the love and compassion (even for our enemies) that Jesus preached?  Are we loving our neighbors as ourselves?  If Jesus speaks the truth and we don't listen, what does that say of us?  It's unfortunate we didn't follow in His footsteps since 9-11.

planetxan
planetxan's picture
TChamp3121 wrote: GOD!! 

TChamp3121 wrote:

GOD!!  OMG!!

I don't know the Latin phrase for this, but I am quite certain it is a rhetorical no-no.

Is that a pair of crossed guns in between the peace sign and a heart?! Good grief. I'm not even going to try...

FoodForAll
FoodForAll's picture
Calperson, what if I tell you

Calperson, what if I tell you I am unconvinced? Are you saying that God and Evil is of the same attributes? Is that not contradictory to what Christianity teaches: i.e., that God is all love and all powerful? How can God be both Loving and Evil at the same time? Please teach us.

FoodForAll
FoodForAll's picture
Labor: how do you know God is

Labor: how do you know God is a man? Is this information based on your religious inculcation?

Laborisgood
Laborisgood's picture
FoodForAll wrote: Labor: how

FoodForAll wrote:

Labor: how do you know God is a man? Is this information based on your religious inculcation?

I don't believe I referred to God's gender, only Jesus'.  I readily admit that my given religion utilizes scripture which refers to God as masculine.  Furthermore, my specific denomination does not allow women in the clergy. Regardless of those facts, I do not see God as gendered.

My preferred Bible translation is the NRSV which strives for gender neutrality insofar as reasonable in it's interpretation of Hebrew and Greek.  The NRSV also takes an ecumenical approach to avoid favoring not only individual Christian denominations, but Judaism as well.  Needless to say, the NRSV is not the officially sanctioned Bible of my Church.  They strongly urge the Protestant-friendly NIV.

I also find it difficult to separate Jesus from Judaism to the extent so many do.  I'm put off by the anti-semitism of some of the New Testament writings.  The need to affix blame for Jesus' death creates an extensive list: Pilate, Judas, Romans, God, Jesus, Sins of the World and of course the Jews.

FoodForAll
FoodForAll's picture
THanks for the clarification,

THanks for the clarification, Labor. Do you mind telling me what Denomination you belong to? Just curious.

harry ashburn
harry ashburn's picture
we  don't hate dog, but we

we  don't hate dog, but we feel he's not living up to his potential

Laborisgood
Laborisgood's picture
Missouri Synod Lutheran

Missouri Synod Lutheran

TChamp3121
TChamp3121's picture
Hess, The flaw in your

Hess,

The flaw in your reasoning is that God did not CREATE man flawed, but perfect.  It was through original sin that man became flawed.  Man turned his back on God.  Read revelation.  This is the theology of Christianity.  When you say that people that believe in Christianity are robots, or idiots that blindley accept what papel authority dictates I think you look upon those people with contempt.  You think those people are idiots, and that you are superior because reasoning does not allow for this kind of thinking.  I was in your shoes at an earlier point in my life, so I know where you're coming from.  As I stated before, the believe in God is a matter of faith, not scientific proof.  You can't measure the two by the same standards.  If you choose to be a secular humanist (atheist) so be it.   But, if you want to talk about theology, I am very willing to discuss it with you.  You might be surprised at the level of study and philosophy that has gone into this through the ages.  This subject has been studies for thousands of years, and to have contempt for this shows a level of ignorance and self righteousness on your part.  I'm sorry;  I don't mean to attack you (labor I would couse he's just an ass!),  but you really need to take a second look before you make statements like this.

You just feel that all these Christians purport to have a moral high ground and want to tell you what to believe and do.  This is so far from the truth.  In this country we have the separation of Church and State, so no one should feel pressured to do what anyone tells them to do.  If you want to be an atheist, I will not try to talk you out of it.  Go for it.  And, I will not try to convert you (not my job).  But, you definitly do not have the same respect for others that do not believe as you do.  So, I ask you;  who's philosophy/religion is better?  

TChamp3121
TChamp3121's picture
FoodForAll wrote: Calperson,

FoodForAll wrote:

Calperson, what if I tell you I am unconvinced? Are you saying that God and Evil is of the same attributes? Is that not contradictory to what Christianity teaches: i.e., that God is all love and all powerful? How can God be both Loving and Evil at the same time? Please teach us.

Food,

God and evil are not the same.  They are two diometrically opposed constructs.  God is not evil.  Satan and evil is the opposite of God and good.  Whatever evil pervades this earth, it is due to mans fall from grace from the perfect creation of God.  Evil is not God's fault. But, though Christ and prayer we strive to reconcile our original state of perfection and grace to God.  And, if we reach out to God, HE responds and becomes part of our walk through life.  We are not in the state of perfect grace at this point in humanity.  There is prophetised the second coming of Christ where "the lion shall lay down with the lamb".  In other words, the original state shall be reinstated, and man shall be brought into the kingdom of God in His perfectly created state.  Jesus (the son of God), has brought us half way at this point in time by forgiving original sin.

 

TChamp3121
TChamp3121's picture
Plane, The crossed guns are

Plane,

The crossed guns are not about overt violence or against those peoples that do not believe in anything I believe in.  That is sooooo creeepy.  I think it's only about a symbol of strenght and support of righteoness (not self righteousness, but objective)  against those that want to harm the innocent.  I am totally against violence, but it  is sooo cool to not live in fear of violence.  So, no worris here.  I'm the good guy.  You need to learn that there are good people out there that own guns.  

TChamp3121
TChamp3121's picture
Yeah,  the whole responsive

Yeah,  the whole responsive question of 9-11will be debated for years to come. Should the U.S. have acted, or done nothing?  From a Christian pespective, at face value I suppose we could have said "vengence be mind sayeth the lord", and done nothing. But,  politically, it would never have flied.  Also, it depends on the intent of  your agressor.  

I do believe that the Muslims waged war on "the infidels".  Bin Laden created this Jihad.  We have had the choice to engage or not.  Of course to not engage would be the first rational choice to anyone.  But, would the situation be worse for it, or better?  

Personally, I think that being completely passive in the  world would be a mistake, though I'd love to see it.  The rest of the world does not look upon the white flag with respect, but rather contempt.  People, it is really a dangerous world out there (just look at the news).  But, despite all this we must look to the good in humanity and as Jesus said "love one another".  

So, my mantra is (in the words fo Teddy Roosevelt), "walk quietly, but carry a big stick";  or something like that.  Peace and strength is my motto.  

 

 

 

TChamp3121
TChamp3121's picture
       

 

 

 

 

lance_cady
lance_cady's picture
Quote:God did not CREATE man

Quote:
God did not CREATE man flawed, but perfect

If man was created perfect, then man would not have sinned. Then again, had God not invented sin, nobody would have sinned. When God created the capacity for sin, God effectively created sin.

Quote:
the believe in God is a matter of faith, not scientific proof.

I have a magic ring. It cures AIDS. I have faith in this belief. I can't prove that it does this, but I'll claim it does. You just have to have faith that it works. Can you see how this line of reasoning seems unconvincing?

Quote:
You can't measure the two by the same standards

Why not? The scientific method has brought the world so much more knowledge about the universe in 200 years than biblical studies have done in 2,000 years. Why shouldn't we rely upon the most reliable source of information that we have?

Quote:
You just feel that all these Christians purport to have a moral high ground and want to tell you what to believe and do.

While this is not true of all Christians, there are the many that do exactly this, and those that try to do this through legislation. You may want to inform those Christians that they are required to do so, and it isn't wanted in a pluralistic society.

Quote:
who's philosophy/religion is better?

Methodological naturalism.

TChamp3121
TChamp3121's picture
"If man was created perfect,

"If man was created perfect, then man would not have sinned. Then again, had God not invented sin, nobody would have sinned. When God created the capacity for sin, God effectively created sin."

God did not create Sin.  This is man's doing.  When Man turned his back on God, this was the original sin.  Remember, God is perfect, Man is not.  Just because man was created perfect does not mean that he remained perfect.  God created Man in His image.  He had free will, He had choice.  He sinned.  This sin was a result of temptation from Satan. 

So, you see, Sin is not Gods creation.  It is the result of Mans rebuttal to God, in the face of life that the creator gave to him.  Do not blame God for this. 

And, because God is soooo loving and forgiving, He gave his only begotten son as a sacrifice for this sin.  For YOUR sin (and all).  This is a big deal.

You are looking at this through the wrong lens.  God did not create this....., man did.

 

 

 

TChamp3121
TChamp3121's picture
Quote:the believe in God is a

Quote:the believe in God is a matter of faith, not scientific proof.

 

I have a magic ring. It cures AIDS. I have faith in this belief. I can't prove that it does this, but I'll claim it does. You just have to have faith that it works. Can you see how this line of reasoning seems unconvincing?

Yep, I do.  You have faith in your magic ring.  There is no scientific proof that it works.  The question is, does it work for YOU?  If it does, I would guess you would believe in it, though you can't proove it to others. 

Once again, like all those non belivers, you are looking for proof for the existence of God.  God has to come to YOU before you believe.  God has to proove HImself to YOU before you consider His existence.

Listen, this is not how God works.  Original sin is about our personal egos.  We are our own self centered universe.  There is no  creator.  It is all about US!  We have to make the first step.

Once one dies unto himself, like Jesus, a whole new world opens up.  A person will never see this if he/she is not willing to make this step.  Once again, this is not Gods fault, but rather Mans. 

TChamp3121
TChamp3121's picture
Quote:You can't measure the

Quote:You can't measure the two by the same standards

 

Why not? The scientific method has brought the world so much more knowledge about the universe in 200 years than biblical studies have done in 2,000 years. Why shouldn't we rely upon the most reliable source of information that we have?

Science is good, no doubt.  And, it can be argued that scienc and religeon have a dance that eventually comes together.  Even Einstein admitted this. 

If you want to live your life by science alone, go for it.  I think you may find it a lonely world.  For while science provides us with mans insights into our physical world, it does nothing for our spiritual world (because it cannot measure a human soul).  And, if you believe there is no such thing as a spiritual world, then I would not stand in your way to your secular humanistic perspective. This is your choice.  But, remember, this is YOU not believing in your creator.  This is a blatent denial of that.  If you're right I guess you have nothing to worry about.  But, if your wrong, you will cease to exist in the afterlife.  This is YOUR choice.  God gave you this choice. 

TChamp3121
TChamp3121's picture
Quote:You just feel that all

Quote:You just feel that all these Christians purport to have a moral high ground and want to tell you what to believe and do

While this is not true of all Christians, there are the many that do exactly this, and those that try to do this through legislation. You may want to inform those Christians that they are required to do so, and it isn't wanted in a pluralistic society.

Yep, technically you're right.  But, I would ask you what your values are.  You see, society is a result of values materialistically manifested.  If one wants to completely dismiss God and values from all aspect of our lives, then there has to be some moral code, some value system thate we choose to live by.  So, what is it?  If you completely deny the existence God, and all His laws that have been passed throught the generations, then what laws to you ascribe to?  Shall we go back to child sacrifice as was done over two thousand years ago?  Shall we believe in the Sun Gods?  How about  Posiden and Zeuss? 

If one believes in a pluralistic society as you say, then one only believes that whatever is the flavor of the month is what we ascribes to.  In other words, you don't believe in anything;  just contemporary beliefs that change like the fashions of clothes. 

I think what you are trying to say is tolerance for all.  But, this value does not stand on it's own merit.  For what value system proclaimes tolerence?  Not Islam!  Only Christianity.  The very base that you abhore! 

TChamp3121
TChamp3121's picture
Quote:who's

Quote:who's philosophy/religion is better?

 

Methodological naturalism.

This is a secular humanistic religion.  It does not believe in a personal God as the creator as christians do.  It has had no savior/prophet that endorses this;  only man's concept of what should be right and wrong (from his own mind).  This is more far out than Christianity, that's for sure.  You might as well believe in Zeuss!!

Look, here's the thing.  It is well documented historically that Jesus was a real man, that existed two thousand years ago.  The question remains if one believes if he was the son of God, and performed miracles.  Was this man God?  This is the crux of the matter.  If one does not believe so, then all bets are off.  Anything goes.

But, if one does, then this is where Christianity begins!  If you read the works of this man it is truly fascinating!  And, there is soo much to be learned here!  This is the basis of not only America, but western Europe!

This country would not be what it is if it were not for this value system.  For all those that have contempt for it, I would ask you what value system would you all like to be under? 

I think many people take this system for granted.  And, I think if it were gone they would miss it very much.  So, for all those liberals out there that have soooo much contempt for Christianity, I would ask you to introspect on how you would feel under a more repressive political/theological regime. 

Think about it!

 

TChamp3121
TChamp3121's picture
Bottom Line Folks, The bottom

Bottom Line Folks,

The bottom line here as I see it is the new secular humanistic religeon vs. all traditional religions here in America.  Since this country is a melting pot of many cultures around the world, it seems we need to accept everyones cultures and beliefs as part of America's value system.  This seems to be the values of America. 

I wonder what America would look like 100 years from now.  If America claims to be tolerant off all, what value system will we have in the future?  If a bunch of hooligans came to this country and believed that killing and eating their victims was part of their religion, would American honor that?  Would we set aside a place in this country for those people to practice their "Religion"?   Is there no limit to what we accept?

You see, society cannot absolutely separate church and state.  And, those of you that believe that atheism is not a religeon, just listen to Thomm.  It is a belief system;  a religion.  The belief in the absence of God is a religeon.  Their religeon is in pure evolultion as a result of accidental events, with no purpose in this life, and no afterlife.  It's all just random coincidence.  This is a belief system;  a religeon!  And, we can make laws that reflect this belief system.  Just go back several thousand years and you will see it.  Multi-Theism.  Child sacrifice.  Orgy's on the alter to the Crop gods.  You name it.  It is spiritual anarchy.  And, I don't think many people today would accept this sort of behavior.

Why?  Because we have learned and evolved through Christianity;  the prophets that came before Jesus, and then Jesus.  This man's entrance into our world has changed it dramatically.  And, this was God's plan. 

For those of you that deny this, so be it.  No one is forcing you.  But, for those that have an open heart and the desire to seek the TRUTH, the door is open to you for exploration.  The risk is minimal (except for turning away from your pride), and the rewards are great. What have you got to lose?

Just so you all know, I really HATE evangelising!!!  I could really care less about changing someone.  I really just want to live my life the way I see fit, and let others do the same.  But, when I see ignorant people talking smack about stuff they really don't know anything about, I feel obliged to correct the record.  So, take it for what it's worth.

 

 

Fletcher Christian
Fletcher Christian's picture
To The Mold... The Cheese Is

To The Mold... The Cheese Is The Universe.  We don't know "what's out there."  We'll never figure this one out... until we've shed our mortal coil.

It takes EXACTLY the same amount of faith to be an Atheist as it does to be a Christian.  There's no easy way out.

The Pro Wrestler Jeff Jarrett once answered the question, "Is wrestling real?"  His answer was;  "To those who believe, no answer is necessary.  To those who don't believe, no answer will do."  Hey! Brotha, that's a pretty wise hillbilly.

"For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction."  I think "somewhat" like Albert Einstein when it comes to the afterlife.  I also have a hard time believing that my consciousness will somehow disappear into "nothingness" when my body dies.                                                                          Does my "soul energy" become nothing more than "worm food" for the earth, like my body will?  I hope not, but if it does... I hope I make great fertilizer for a beautiful tree by a pond.  What I would like to happen is that my consciousness travels to meet everyone else's consciousness and we exist with all knowledge and then we could truly "commune with the one".  Is that the Christian heaven that's talked about in the bible?  I'm leaning towards "YES".

I was raised in the church.  I went with my family about 4 times a week for about 20 years.  I then was "shot with a diamond" of knowledge that the people to whom I 100% believed in were... less than believable.  Since then, I've had some serious faith issues over the years.  After all of my doubts... I somehow feel more righteous NOW than I ever did growing up.  I'm nowhere near as judgemental as I used to be.  (I still have issues when it comes to being disgusted by homosexuality.  I'm working on that one.)

I have major concerns about the teachings of the Old Testament.  I would bring them up as a child in bible study and eventually, the teacher of the class would tell me to be quiet.  I'm sure this gave my parents a lot of grief from the church community because I did NOT get my ideas from them.  The questions I had (and still have) are all the major one's and I won't take up your time airing them out.  (Plus, there's TOO many!)

This is how I read/think about the bible now.  (It could change tomorrow!)  But for now, here's what I got.                                                                                                                                                  "GOD" is perfect.  God is love.  God is omnipotent.  Men (obviously) are not.  Anything that is written down or talked about in which God is not positive, perfect, or omnipotent... it is due to HUMAN ERROR.  This includes the stories that are written in the bible.  This is where I get in hot water with my fellow believers.                                                                                                                                 I would like to start going back to church.  But as soon as they find out why I don't believe the bible's account of "Cain and Abel" or "Judas betraying Jesus"... they'd kick me out. If I could go and not have to give all of my opinions on certain topics, it would be cool.  In essence, I can tolerate them, but they cannot tolerate me.  (I think Chris Hedges said something similar, I could be wrong.)

The bible (New and Old Testaments) are the single greatest collections of thoughts on humanity that has ever existed.  The major problem with the way the bible is written is that there aren't any stoppages that say, "OK, the next few chapters are metaphors and parables.  They're not to taken literally... Now that's over... this section IS to be taken literal, got it?"  It'd be nice if it was written like that, right?

I love talking about the bible.  But I refuse to do it with a self imposed myopia.

 

 

dhavid
Don't believe in the bible,

Don't believe in the bible, so don't pull that sh*t on me. Here is another, much older than the bible's, perspective:

“Rama asked Hanuman, ‘Hanuman, what is your attitude when you worship me?’ Hanuman said, ‘Sometimes I see that You are the whole and I a part of You. At other times, I see that You are the Master and I am Your servant. And Rama, when I have the knowledge of Absolute Truth, I see that You are I and I am You.’  (In my opinion, the only difference between a fundamentalist Muslim and a fundamentalist Christian is the book they believe in.)

Fletcher Christian
Fletcher Christian's picture
REVELATIONS I don't believe

REVELATIONS

I don't believe this book is directly or spiritually intact with the other books of the New Testament.  Here are my reasons for thinking the way I do on this one.

1) WE DON'T KNOW WHO WROTE IT!  Is it: "John From Patmos", or "John The Divine", or "John The Evangelist, or "John The Apostle", or "John The Baptists".  Most think it's all the same guy.  The book is written by someone whom we know little to nothing about!  If it were the apostle John that wrote it... IT WOULD SAY SO!  It doesn't, does it?  NO!  It doesn't.  In todays terms, it'd be like saying, "Carl from East St. Louis".  There's too many "Carls that live in East St. Louis!                 Many experts think that when the Catholic church canonized the books of the bible, they made an oversimplified decision.  "Hmm... The story begins with Genesis so therefore, we need an ending.  A 'good' one to.  I know, let's put in the spooky Revelation one written by crazy guy from Patmos."

2) The violence contained in the book of Revelations does not seem to fit the refrain of forgiveness that the rest of the New Testament teaches.

3) The "Friday, the 13th" scenario with Satan.  So if I have this story right... Satan is defeated and then cast down into a bottomless pit.  (Even though it's a bottomless pit, he's somehow "chained" to it.  I'll let that one go, it's minor.)  Jesus then lets his guard down and Satan rises out of the pit only to be smitten once more.  There lies the problem.  Let's enter "logic" to the story and see if it holds water.  We've been given this "Holy" text.  We've read it now for a couple of thousand years... we KNOW that Satan isn't defeated when he gets cast into the pit.  He's going to reappear like "Jason or Freddy or any other B-movie villain.  We only DON'T know this when we hear this story for the 1st time.  Certainly, Satan has read this part of the story... so why get in the fight in the 1st place and how come Jesus doesn't know that he's coming back for one last 'gotchya!" moment?                 This all has the earmarks of a HUMAN concocted story line.

4) It's so purposefully vague that anyone, at anytime, can contort it so that they think it's about their time and space.  When we're talking about "eternity"... just what does the phrase, "The END is near!" really mean?  Was it about our time?  Was it about the time of Nero?  Was it about the time of The Cold War?  Was it about the time of WW1 or WW2?  Was it about the time of the Spanish Inquisition?  Was it about the time of The Manson Family?  Our human egos make everything about OUR time.  See, WE'RE the important ones.  WE are smarter than all of those other societies, so only WE can truly see the "signs and wonders" that John was talking about.  Bullshit.

5) This book has caused so much innocent blood to be shed that it cannot be divinely inspired by GOD.  I can think of no other distortion that has been the inspiration for people to justify the horrible deeds they perform on other human beings.  None of the other books come close.  The New Testament consistently talks about reinstating love and understanding.  This book does not.

Ok.  Now pass the hat around... that's it.  Good sheep.  You know, I overheard someone say that The "Reverend" Fletcher Christian was seen cruising around in a new Mustang.  Well if you "really" loved me... I'd be driving a new cadillac!  Hallelujah! C'mon people!  Give me the 1st of the check money.  If you only give me what's left of the check money... then that's the kind of Heaven you'll get... the little part that's left!  Dig deep!  Dig deep!  DIG DEEP my Brothers and Sisters!  Praise GAWD!  Hallelujah.  Did I mention... The Lord is now taking GOLD!  Even the ones in your teeth... pass em' on up, now.  God Bless.

Redlocks
Redlocks's picture
Hey, liberal, progressive,

Hey, liberal, progressive, radical, hippie dude here. I have dred locks, don't worship the federal reserve note like we are taught to in this nation and push for re-inventing our government so that it is for the People and not just the wealthy, white men in charge.

And I love God. A lot. Way more than some of those politicians and business people that use Jesus and God to get elected or to sell their junk.

Now, I have some weird notions of God. I have some very heart felt beliefs about the spiritual nature of this universe. I have spent years pursuing this. I pray - some time for hours - every day. I do not go to government sponsored non-profit corporations to find God, but that is just one of my wacky beliefs...you are welcome to seek that comfort.

Yet, I don't think government should be an instrument to push my beliefs on other people. Why do you want to push your beliefs on everyone else. 

Government should not be in the business of telling what religion to beleive in. It should not dicate how people behave in the privacy of their own homes or the words that come out people's lives.

You want Government to dictate how I worship GOD. I do not. I want to be able to worship a speghetti monster in the sky if I want to (which I don't if you must know...although my personal, religious beliefs are none of your business...if I told you my true beliefs, I'm sure you would condemn me to hell like so many "chrisitans" have the habit of doing.).

For me, if someone wants to go spend times in non-profit corporate churches, that is cool. Just keepy your church stuff there. I'll keep my wacky religious beleifs here in my life. But, I will continue to pay for your churches,'cuz they aren't paying any taxes......

You might want to thank us liberals, 'cuz at least we aren't trying to tax the churches.

And, hey, you know Mosques don't pay taxes either...doesn't that make evangelical, racists, homophobes mad?!?!?!?

 

leighmf
leighmf's picture
I recommend you attend more

I recommend you attend more Bible classes under the tutelage of a scholar. The Book is called Revelation, not "Revelations." Believe it or not, there is a big difference in the semantics of  these words when considering the whole context of the scripture.

Bush_Wacker
Bush_Wacker's picture
I have watched this

I have watched this documentary numerous times over the years.  It's almost 20 years old now but it still brings a lot of inconvenient facts to the discussion of Christianity.  If you are bored and interested.

http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-naked-truth/

TChamp3121
TChamp3121's picture
Fletcher, I think I agree

Fletcher,

I think I agree with you whole heartedly.  And, I apologize if I came accross as myopic (Big word....had to look it up :^) )  I am merely trying to balance the secular humanistic perspective here with traditional Christian Dogma.    I do not claim nor believe that the Christian Church is perfect.  I have many complaints myself. And, I'm merely trying to contrast the extremes for arguments sake;  in order to frame the debate.   I would not be on this website if I didn't have progressive ideas.  A true right wing extremist would not even waste their time here.   

I go to Christian Bible studies and regularly challenge the Dogma of the church.  There are many grey areas in this discussion.  And, while I may disagree with some of these thorny issues, I also can appreciate where the church is coming from, and what their reasoning is behind there moral adjuncts. 

I think if we were to completely dismiss the moral authority of the Christian Church, the world would be a much worse place.  So, we must be careful not to throw the baby out with the bathwater as they say.  In my church (Roman Catholic), there is a communion between the parisioners and the priests.  The people in my group do not accept church teachings with absolute authority anymore.  Times have changed.  The peoples are educated enought today to question these moral issues, and the church cannot ignore that anymore.  So,  the new approach is to open discussions on these issues.  In my church it's called "Adult Faith Ministries", and we have very deep discussions on contemporary issues and how they are viewed by the faith of Christianity and the teaching of the Church.

We should not accept the teachings of Church at face value anymore, because the Church is fallable.  But, we should not completely dismiss the Church either because it is not perfect.  The inspired church seeks to bring the word of GOD into our lives to improve it;  to improve humanity;  and, it sets the bar for us to strive for  better r.  It does not seek to persecute the individual.  It merely seeks to investigate the true meaning of life,  and how to approach it (in the purest sence).

So, criticize all you want.  I'm in there too.  But, I would never leave my church for it's fallabilites, but rather stick by it, and look to correct  and perfect it, much as we would a family member that has gone astray. 

 

TChamp3121
TChamp3121's picture
DHavid, You need to do some

DHavid,

You need to do some more research on this issue.  I can tell from your response that you haven't looked more deeply into this.  This is a very deep subject, with many nuonces. 

 

TChamp3121
TChamp3121's picture
Fletcher, The book of

Fletcher,

The book of Revelations is quite arguably the most difficult book in the bible.  Some scholars even wonder why it was included. I find it facinating, though quite  apocolyptic.

 So, the question arises, " whould you completely discount what is written in the Bible on all fronts due to the inunderstandable nature of revelation"?  Is there no value there whatsoever? 

Once again, my issue here is the total goal of discretiting the teachings of the chruch.  While I agree that there is so much that is not understandable by contemporary man in Revelation,  does this misunderstanding negate the Chruch?  Are we our own Gods that we can judge for ourselves?  Does the Church have a roll in our everyday contemporay society? 

I think the thing that bugs so many poeple about the Church is that it doesn't budge and excuse our own personal behavior.  They stubbornly hold to the moral highground, and make no apologies for it.  As self centered contemporary people we expect the church to change for us.  But it doesen't.  And, that's the problem.

What we should resist is blind obedience to an fallible  instituion.  What we shouldn't do is condem and throw away the heart and soul of our conceived personal and mutual believes embodied in the Church.

So, in summary,  there is fine grey line here people.  We need to be smart, humbly obedient, and have reverence for our lord and savior.  We also need to seek the truth so as to improve the church. 

No man is an Island.  And, no Island is a man.  So, keep the faith, seek truth, and pray to God the creator. 

That, or go it alone and seek your own personal form of Religeion.

God Speed Ya'll.

dhavid
Well TChamp, I was a

Well TChamp, I was a born-again Christian for 9 years, one of which I spent at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary in South Hamilton, Massachusetts. Trust me, I have considered it all.

TChamp3121
TChamp3121's picture
    dhavid;  Well then, you

 

 

dhavid; 

Well then, you are a better man than I. Yep.  So, what is your recomendation to me?  Should I completely pitch Christianity?  What religeon should I adopt?  Should I adopt any?  Are they all hogwash?  What should we believe in....anything?  Nothing at all?  Tell me. 

TChamp3121
TChamp3121's picture
So People, My ultimate

So People,

My ultimate question here that I pose to you all is "do you believe in God or not"?  And, beyond that and as a result of that, "Is there a creator"?  Is HE/SHE  a personal God?  In other words, do we have a personal relation ship with HIM/HER, or is it an impersonal one?  Is God real, or kinda like Santa Claus,  a figment of our own creation? 

I don't think any of us can come up with proof positive for any of this.  But, what I do believe is that even if none of this were true, we are better people for the idea of it.  The values perpetuated, hard and high valued as they are have created a challenge to Man to become better, even if they are not attainable.

 

dhavid
http://www.wedietorememberwha

http://www.wedietorememberwhatwelivetoforget.com/AlanWatts.html  Is an interesting excerpt from Alan Watts. I believe there are many paths to a "unitive knowledge of the ground of being." I don't believe in a jealous, angry, vengful God who sits in judgment and demands a blood sacrifice to appease His anger, Jesus being the ultimate blood sacrifice, the "Lamb of God, who takes away the sins of the world."  Just don't believe it. I simply don't know the answer to your question, but I feel that within each of us is the potential to have communion, in silence, with that which is, and that is Alive. It is all very mysterious to me, but I catagorically reject all fundamentalist religionists. To me it's just ego and projection.