Argentina to nationalize oil over Spain's objections

3 posts / 0 new
Last post
nimblecivet
nimblecivet's picture

http://news.yahoo.com/eu-voices-concern-over-argentina-ypf-seizure-130015844--finance.html

The concept of "law" comes up here according to the article. International law is a different beast than intrastate law. In this case, the legal right of Spanish companies to their property is explicitly referred to as the spoils of "reconquest." "Reconquest" is the investment of Spanish companies in South America which occurred after the transition of Spain to a democratic (representative) political structure. In other words, ironically, after the fascist dictatorship fell in Spain a new wave of neocolonialism followed. Anyone familiar with the history of the type of financial crises being imposed upon countries like Greece and Spain knows that Argentina suffered from neoliberal policies long before we in the U.S. became familiar with them through the 2008 crisis.

Obviously this is not good news for Spain, but the Argentine people are supportive of this and other measures already taken by the administration of President Fernandez of Argentina. They have learned their lesson about the nature of neoliberalism and European arrogance. Argentina has rejected the IMF after a previous crisis in the early '90s. While countries such as Brazil and Argentina are not under the direction of movements as radical as those found in Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador, they correctly identify their current troubles as originating from the "expansionist monetary policy" of the United States. We may do well to follow the example of Argentina here, as seizure of oil refineries owned by lawless companies such as British Petroleum may be the best way to set aside the failed policy of continued quantitative easing and bailouts of a rogue, criminal, and illegitimate corporate ruling class.

Comments

Karolina
Karolina's picture
nimblecivet wrote:While

nimblecivet wrote:
While countries such as Brazil and Argentina are not under the direction of movements as radical as those found in Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador, they correctly identify their current troubles as originating from the "expansionist monetary policy" of the United States.

We may do well to follow the example of Argentina here, as seizure of oil refineries owned by lawless companies such as British Petroleum may be the best way to set aside the failed policy of continued quantitative easing and bailouts of a rogue, criminal, and illegitimate corporate ruling class.

That is a GREAT idea!

Choco
Choco's picture
It's insane not to have

It's insane not to have publicly owned energy companies. The more scarce oil becomes and the more concentrated the companies become, the more power and more money a few individuals will have. The more they have the more they will be able to influence venal politicians with. I think I just uttered a redundancy. Oil and most energies are the commons. We all need them. We shouldn't have private corporations owning the oil or water or air or airwaves or election systems. The commons should be commonly owned.