Republicans war on women

7 posts / 0 new

The Republicans let the dogs of war loose on women. Maybe Mittens made a mistake as did all those hating mysoginist radio show hosts.

Well they had better listen up us the women of this country are a really big voting block. And we will take them down. How dare they think they can dictate. Well better listen up all you gouls it is not the 19th century. Vaginal probes to gain termination of pregnancy? I think not how sick are you? The state sanctioned rape of women? enough is enough. No insurange coverage of birth control? Think youreself lucky you were not the daddy. Now who pays for youre Viagra when yoiu deficient males cant get it up? You want to fight? Yes we do and we are ready to fight and allways remember Mittens you need our vote.

gr8macaw's picture
gr8macaw
Joined:
Apr. 6, 2010 6:20 pm

Comments

The other thing regarding womens' issues is that they tend to cut across other political affiliations. Some women might generally be fiscally conservative or w/e but then you start doing things like the Republicans have been doing lately and they will vote for a Dem because the womens' issue is more important to them.

Sorta look at it this way - You have a candidate that you completely agree with on everything but then they come out and say that there will be mandatory urethra swabs and a kick in the balls for men every time they go to the doctor. How many guys do you think are gonna vote for that person?

ah2
Joined:
Dec. 13, 2010 9:00 pm
Quote ah2:

Sorta look at it this way - You have a candidate that you completely agree with on everything but then they come out and say that there will be mandatory urethra swabs and a kick in the balls for men every time they go to the doctor. How many guys do you think are gonna vote for that person?

:D That's about it, ah2. Thanks for getting it so well. But, you know, it's not just the horror of their plans for us, it's also that their plans reveal such a loose screw in those heads that you don't want them anywhere near government.

Anyway, I hate to break it to you, folks, but the war on women didn't begin with the Repugnants. It's been around for awhile, probably even before Mr. Homo went erectus and left his knuckle-dragging days behind, at least physically; mentally, he never quite got over a certain knuckle-dragging mentality, mostly just because it's more fun than standing upright and looking females right in the eye, face to face and eye-ball to eye-ball.

Fast forward to now, though, and you've got the Repugs dragging their knuckles all over women's rights. And why? Well, think about how scary it must be for the patriarchs, when females get liberated from the biological imperatives of their bodies, namely pregnancy, and discover their own sexuality, thereby leaving their previous role as sexual prey behind and going all eager for sex. What happens then to the patriarch's role as sexual conqueror, not only if women want sex, but they can go off and live their lives after it, not having been nailed by the power of his sperm? Oh poor Homo Flaccidus! What else can you expect him to do, but try to reduce women again to their "proper roles," to restore him to his role as conqueror? ;-)

Zenzoe
Joined:
Jul. 31, 2007 3:01 pm
Quote ah2:

The other thing regarding womens' issues is that they tend to cut across other political affiliations. Some women might generally be fiscally conservative or w/e but then you start doing things like the Republicans have been doing lately and they will vote for a Dem because the womens' issue is more important to them.

Sorta look at it this way - You have a candidate that you completely agree with on everything but then they come out and say that there will be mandatory urethra swabs and a kick in the balls for men every time they go to the doctor. How many guys do you think are gonna vote for that person?

Republican guys will. They can't help themselves. They continually vote against their best interest time after time. I have a lot of conservative friends who are let's say, less than wealthy and they vote republican every time not to mention the continual talking points of the right. They get poorer every year and some of them get a lot of use out of the welfare system. The funny thing is that I've known these people a very long time and they never had a real political thought in their head until the cable "news" became such a big part of their lives. It amazes me that so many people who need assistance keep voting to have it taken away. But then again they are registered republicans. No offense.

PS. They will probably say that that kick in the balls doesn't really hurt THAT much.

Bush_Wacker's picture
Bush_Wacker
Joined:
Jun. 25, 2011 6:53 am

Some women will vote repuke because they identify with spousal abuse. They vote as their husbands tell them to, or they will pay a price. They know they will suffer, just as a pimp's girls will suffer, but they will continue. Within some of the church doctrine they have been raised with, women are supposed to be subservient, and children should be beaten. That is republican, that is america.

btw, Ann's work with gardeners, and maids, housekeepers, first class daycare is not the same work that mitt says single moms must do to appreciate the dignity of minimum wage. Title 10- gone, planned parenthood- gone, neonatal under medcaid- gone. Helps explain why poorer countries have much better infant survival rates than the richest country in the world.

Pitiful, pitiful-[uncle Jed]

douglaslee's picture
douglaslee
Joined:
Jul. 31, 2007 3:01 pm

Romney had 5 boys that couldn't cut the grass, or didn't know how. Maybe mom Ann was protecting them from manual labor. I wonder if they know how to make up their rooms, wash dishes, or as one of the boys had to post their dad doing laundry, do they know how? The picture showed him using the single load soap box from a dispenser, can any of them measure a volumn of soap, or flour, or sugar. How about oil for the car or grass cutter.

douglaslee's picture
douglaslee
Joined:
Jul. 31, 2007 3:01 pm

One thing to think about when it comes to support . The wife of the president needs to be a woman that will stand up and help the females of the US, Michelle Obama does that. However Mitts wife is from another type of woman and she will do what he tells her to do perhaps I do not see her as any support at all.

Vickie Bodie's picture
Vickie Bodie
Joined:
Oct. 20, 2011 7:43 pm

Currently Chatting

The other way we're subsidizing Walmart...

Most of us know how taxpayers subsidize Walmart's low wages with billions of dollars in Medicaid, food stamps, and other financial assistance for workers. But, did you know that we're also subsidizing the retail giant by paying the cost of their environmental destruction.

Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system