Congress announced plans to hold hearings on the Secret Service so-called sex scandal.

3 posts / 0 new

Independent Joe Lieberman is leading the distraction in the Senate – and Republican Peter King is leading it in the House. Of course – no jobs will be created by investigating the Secret Service – but it will keep the mainstream media distracted for another few news cycles from the issues that really matter

Thom Hartmann Administrator's picture
Thom Hartmann A...
Joined:
Dec. 29, 2009 9:59 am

Comments

You make zero argument for dismissing this issue. National security may have been compromised. Listen to the interviews with these "working girls". They refer to these guys are fools. If the lower rungs of the ladder are weak the upper ones will also fail. Sullivan should have been fired a long time ago and you know it. Obama is afraid of him. Had Bush, or god forbid, Reagan been on duty, you would have lost all control sputtering and shouting into the microphone they were at fault for having the wrong people in charge. Hipocrisy works both ways.

THISAA's picture
THISAA
Joined:
Dec. 16, 2011 5:49 am
You make zero argument for dismissing this issue.
The impression I got was that Thom feels that this issue is a distraction from more important issues and that Congress could better be doing things that create jobs. Also, it is sometimes useful to consider the source of where the impetus for these investigations is coming from. I have heard such terrible things about Peter King and Neocon Joe Lieberman that I think Thom may be right.

I don't know if there is a serious risk of compromised National security, but I doubt it. I don't imagine that some prostitutes thinking that some Secret Service guys seem foolish really constitutes a National Security threat. I think that Joe Lieberman and Peter King are complete fools, but I don't consider that to be a National Security threat.

I haven't seen any evidence that President Obama is afraid of Mark Sullivan, but that would certainly be of interest.

Had Bush, or god forbid, Reagan been on duty, you would have lost all control sputtering and shouting into the microphone they were at fault for having the wrong people in charge. Hipocrisy works both ways.
You seem to be new on these liberal message boards. Liberals have been complaining from the time of President Obama's election about his appointments, so I don't think there is a question of hypocricy here.

By all means, continue with these arguments. We are all interested to hear your opinions.

Art's picture
Art
Joined:
Jul. 31, 2007 3:01 pm

Latest Headlines

One Iowa Caucus Delegate Comes Down To Coin Toss

The Iowa caucus convener flipped a coin. Bernie Sanders supporters called "heads" and it landed on tails.

Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton by 31 points in N.H.: Poll

Sanders was at 61 percent support in the University of Massachusetts Lowell/7News poll, followed by Mrs. Clinton, at 30 percent

Martin O'Malley suspends presidential campaign after Iowa caucuses

The announcement came after O'Malley barely registered in Iowa against his better-known rivals Clinton and Sanders, failing to meet already low expectations

If You Want to Win, Go Progressive

The big question right now is whether to call Hillary Clinton a progressive, or a "moderate."

And then there's the question of who is more electable in a general election: an unabashedly progressive democrat, like Bernie Sanders; or a "centrist" democrat, like Hillary Clinton.

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system