Why Are American Evangelicals Silent on the Issue of Chinese Forced Abortion?

10 posts / 0 new
Last post
peterwexler
peterwexler's picture

* Evangelicals embrace Ronald Reagan's values of workplace autocracy;

* Evangelicals embrace Ronald Reagan's desire to obliterate FDR's new deal;

* Evangelicals will go to any length to realize Ronald Reagan's desires.

Here's a link to my bloviation on the subject:

http://wexblog.prwexler.com/2012/05/03/my-conspiracy-theory-reverend-ric...

Comments

Karolina
Karolina's picture
That is true for the top

That is true for the top people of the right-wing fundamentalists.

Another disgusting reason that I was shocked to hear from a right-wing Christian person is that the reson they don't want white women and white girls to be allowed to have abortions, is because they are afraid that the white race will keep becoming more a minority and eventually disappear.

Capital
Capital's picture
Who is Rick Warren and why

Who is Rick Warren and why are you belligerently broad brushing an entire religion. 

Why is Obama Silent on Foced abortions in China?

mjolnir
mjolnir's picture
Has Obama spoken out about

Has Obama spoken out about the dozens of Christians killed in Nigeria recently?

Art
Art's picture
Quote:Why is Obama Silent on

Quote:
Why is Obama Silent on Foced abortions in China?
What, exactly, do you think Obama should do? 

peterwexler
peterwexler's picture
Capital, Rick Warren is the

Capital,

Rick Warren is the regional evangelical who endorses the death penalty for homosexuals in Uganda.

As far as painting evangelicals with a broad brush is concerned, YOU are the POT calling the KETTLE BLACK. ON AN ALL-TOO-REGULAR-BASIS, evangelicals use broad brushes when speaking of Muslims, homosexuals, pro-choicers, etc.

HOW DARE YOU TELL ME THAT I AM USING TOO BROAD OF A BRUSH to describe the neo-Christian evangelical crowd. Go back to your backyard bomb shelter and have one of your gourmet MREs for dinner.

IDIOT!

TheFirstLeftist
TheFirstLeftist's picture
peterwexler wrote: *

peterwexler wrote:

* Evangelicals embrace Ronald Reagan's values of workplace autocracy;

* Evangelicals embrace Ronald Reagan's desire to obliterate FDR's new deal;

* Evangelicals will go to any length to realize Ronald Reagan's desires.

Here's a link to my bloviation on the subject:

http://wexblog.prwexler.com/2012/05/03/my-conspiracy-theory-reverend-ric...

Ronald Reagan was a New Deal Democrat with a Republican Party affiliation. While he supported a ridiculous military buildup against a third world socialist country that was no threat to the U.S., he was way less of a warmonger than FDR. 

Laborisgood
Laborisgood's picture
Oh yes, it takes a true war

Oh yes, it takes a true war mongerer to fight against the likes of Hitler and Mussolini (at great loss of blood and treasure).  Only those who would intend to profit (in many different ways) from military action can be considered "New Deal" leaders.

stwo
stwo's picture
  Art wrote:What, exactly, do

 

Art wrote:
What, exactly, do you think Obama should do?
 

By Peter Wexler's logic, silence = advocacy.

Art
Art's picture
Quote:By Peter Wexler's

Quote:
By Peter Wexler's logic, silence = advocacy
So, what does it mean tha American Evangelicans are silent on Chines forced abortions? Why aren't right-wingers speaking out on the african AIDS epidemic? Why don't Republicans have anything to say about the murder of Melissa Jenkins? Why didn't Republicans make a peep about Sarah Palins idiotic "blood liable" remark? Why did the right-wing have absolutely nothing to say about the fire-bombing of a Planned Parenthood Clinic in McKinney Texas? Why do right-wingers have absolutely nothing to say about the tragic murder/suicide by Rachelle Grimmer in Texas last year? 

Why do you ask these idiotic questions?