Are people operating through force superior to and more efficient that people acting voluntarily?

1 post / 0 new

Government is just people. The market is just people. To take an example, let's look at Medicare. A lot of progressives want everyone to have the option of buying into medicare. If Medicare is run superiorly to the free market, can't the people who run Medicare just set up a private business and outcompete existing private medical care/insurance providers. Does something magical happen to people when they become part of the government? If people are greedy and selfish, doesn't that mean that the people who make up government are also greedy and selfish? The only counter to this argument is that the people who enter government are somehow morally superior to those in the private sector. I am confident that history has shown that this is not the case.

Restated. If government provision of a service is superior to market provision, why can't the people in government just outcompete their private sector counterparts without the force of government behind them?

TheFirstLeftist's picture
TheFirstLeftist
Joined:
Mar. 23, 2012 2:33 pm

Currently Chatting

Who Should an Economy Serve?

The top one percent own half of all the world's assets. In stark contrast, the bottom fifty percent of the world owns less than one percent. According to the 2014 Global Wealth Report from Credit Suisse, global inequality has surged since the 2008 financial collapse. The report explains that while global wealth has more than doubled since the year 2000, the vast majority of overall growth has gone to those who were already wealthy.

Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system