Me trying to rewrite history…. Interesting theory.
Your Claim “You had NO idea there were other bills”
Facts http://www.thomhartmann.com/forum/2012/03/patient-protection-and-affordable-care-act-constitutional?page=1#comment-127378 He is Me mentioning the two bills. March 7th of this year. One of a couple I’m sure. Since this isn’t my first discussion on the individual mandate. Now I am almost sure you DID NOT know there was two. Do you have any Facts that refute my claim.
I see your Wiki and Raise you the Dictionary “a member of a congress, especially of the U.S. House of Representatives.” Last I checked, Senators are members of Congress. (would you like the definition of Congress also) So am concerned that you wish to twist the English language in your infantile attempt to get me to Retract something.
Find a real mistake and we’ll talk. But so far…. This it just funny shit.
And said, if you are making up shit, you might have just said “Chaffee bill COULD have had 95% for all we know”. But I like you use of Qualifiers “support for bills will probably be bigger than the number of cosponsors” or it PROBABLY be smaller if it came to a vote. But you are absolutely correct…. Both died in committee so this is all mental masturbation. So why even drum up 75%....
Ok… I’ll take your claim with a grain of salt…. Wide support but not Majority support. Which essentially means they had nothing. I’m glad we hammered out the English language. Although I would claim the Antonym of widespread. It had Limited support.
Without proof? 2 bills in 3 days, Having the minority GOP support, never so much as getting a hearing…. Yet here you are claiming it WAS serious without proof. I think mine would beat yours in a trial.
As if I really expected you to have an epiphany just now and acknowledge you’re grossly flawed fallacious reasoning.
You seriously can’t figure that out. What is 27% subtract 44%. I gave up trying to help you with your math… Apparently even Subtraction even eludes your grasp.