YES! – We need to have an egalitarian economy, not one with winners & losers.
72%
NO! – We just need proper regulations restricting predatory capital.
28%

Comments

DonaldFG 3 years 38 weeks ago

If well regulated, capitalism can work. But as economist Richard Wolff has said, corporate big business will just resume their campaign to turn back regulation again as they always do. That being true, the regulation needs to be in stone!

Since we probably won't have regulation in stone, we need some other economic system.

skepticalscott 3 years 38 weeks ago

You are spot on, Donald! Richard Wolff http://www.rdwolff.com/ is a great resource for understanding our Economic Crisis! I've watched a lot of his YouTube videos, Especially his lecture on "Capitalism Hits The Fan" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n30zO0ABFqc&feature=related

SalmonNationWoman's picture
SalmonNationWoman 3 years 38 weeks ago

There's the "if only" again! If only capitalism were we'll regulated, then it would work. Well, IT WAS well regulated for decades and look where it gotten us. Accelerating unfettered destruction of the planet's resources and atmosphere. Violations of human rights so numerous even in our own country that we may never undo them while fear-mongering lamestream media instills suspicion and hatred at an unprecedented pace. Concentrated Animal Farming Operations (CAFO's) abusing livestock, spewing out toxic waste and superbugs faster than we can comprehend, let alone combat, all in the name of "cheap food" to fuel our mindless gluttony and make more obscene profits for the greedy.

We are long overdue for an egalitarian system that focuses wise and sustainable use of resources while intelligently curbing population growth through the best quality education for all.

humanitys team's picture
humanitys team 3 years 38 weeks ago

On our planet we have rejected out-of-hand any system which does not allow for the advancement of one being at the expense of another.

If a system of government or economics requires an attempt at equitable distribution,to all,of the benefits created by all with the resources belonging to all ,we have said that that system of government violates the natural order.Yet in highly evolved cultures,the natural order is equitable sharing.

Beingness is the only way the world can work ,who we are being in relation to each other and the speciesystem ,lets find a way to balance the needs of the speciesystem rather than serve the interests of the rich and powerful because no species within the system can survive if the system itself is destroyed.

Is this not obvious? remember the common good is life.

namaste

telliottmbamsc's picture
telliottmbamsc 3 years 38 weeks ago

A distribution of wealth and income that resembles a standard normal distribution - where everybody is freely moving throughout the distribution over time - would be more ideal than the mess we have now.

Add comment

Login or register to post comments

Secretary John Kerry Makes History At The UN

While much of the mainstream media was focused on 2016 election cycle, Secretary of State John Kerry was making history with his granddaughter at the United Nations. Last week, Secretary Kerry joined a gathering of the majority of the world's nations and signed on to the historic Paris Climate Accord.

Latest Headlines

Who rejected United States-North Korea peace talks?

There were conflicting reports on Sunday regarding a recent proposal for United States-North Korea peace talks which was allegedly made before North Korea"s recent nuclear test

U.K. Pound Falls As Markets Get Brexit Jitters

Bloomberg said on Monday the pound had sustained its biggest fall against the dollar in 11 months

Clinton: I'll defend Israel but push for 'two-state solution

Hillary Clinton believes both Republican candidates Donald Trump and Ted Cruz "missed the mark" with their approach to the Israel-Palestinian Arab conflict
From Cracking the Code:
"No one communicates more thoughtfully or effectively on the radio airwaves than Thom Hartmann. He gets inside the arguments and helps people to think them through—to understand how to respond when they’re talking about public issues with coworkers, neighbors, and friends. This book explores some of the key perspectives behind his approach, teaching us not just how to find the facts, but to talk about what they mean in a way that people will hear."
Paul Loeb, author of Soul of a Citizen
From The Thom Hartmann Reader:
"In an age rife with media-inspired confusion and political cowardice, we yearn for a decent, caring, deeply human soul whose grasp of the problems confronting us provides a light by which we can make our way through the quagmire of lies, distortions, pandering, and hollow self-puffery that strips the American Dream of its promise. How lucky we are, then, to have access to the wit, wisdom, and willingness of Thom Hartmann, who shares with us here that very light, grown out of his own life experience."
Mike Farrell, actor, political activist, and author of Just Call Me Mike and Of Mule and Man
From The Thom Hartmann Reader:
"Thom Hartmann channels the best of the American Founders with voice and pen. His deep attachment to a democratic civil society is just the medicine America needs."
Tom Hayden, author of The Long Sixties and director, Peace and Justice Resource Center.