A frequent anti-government talking point is that the government wastes tax revenues by spending the money that comes in. I'll concede that point if you acknowledge that the definition of an economy is the flow of money throughout the system. Yes? Now my point: The over-accumulation of capital by one group that just sits on it takes money out of the economy making it sluggish. To make our economy vibrant again, money needs to flow. So who better to get that money moving than the government who, by your definition, will only spend the money it gets from taxes. On a related point, there are vast amounts of money sitting on the sidelines looking for something to do (check out the reserves of the big investment banks). Once the economy gets going, then that money will come off the sidelines and get into the game (big boom coming). And the wealthy will become wealthier because their money is actually doing something. So, if you want to stimulate the stock market and help the wealthy then increase their taxes for their own good.

Comments

Add comment

Login or register to post comments

Latest Headlines

As Obama talks of climate change in Alaska, oil giant Shell readies drills in the Arctic

And in 2041, the Antarctica could be opened up just as the Arctic has been

Scott Walker: Building a wall at the Canadian border might be "legitimate" idea

It's not just the southern border: Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker says it's "legitimate" to discuss building a wall separating the United States from Canada, as well

Malaysia's democracy is in worse shape than we thought

Malaysia's ethnic groups, and thus Malaysia itself, are looking more and more divided

Community Archive

"Unequal Protection: How Corporations Became People."

Thom Hartmann Here with an excerpt from my book “Unequal Protection: How corporations became “people” - and how you can fight back.”
-----