A recent report by the Congressional Research Service (at http://aging.senate.gov/crs/ss9.pdf) found the following:

Raising or eliminating the cap on wages that are subject to taxes could reduce the long-range
deficit in the Social Security Trust Funds. For example, if the maximum taxable earnings amount
had been raised in 2005 from $90,000 to $150,000—roughly the level needed to cover 90% of all
earnings—it would have eliminated roughly 40% of the long-range shortfall in Social Security.

In addition, the study found that income inequality exacerbates the funding shortfall:

Since 1982, the Social Security taxable earnings base has risen at the same rate as average wages
in the economy. However, because of increasing earnings inequality, the percentage of covered
earnings that are taxable has decreased from 90% in 1982 to 85% in 2005. The percentage of
covered earnings that is taxable is projected to decline to about 83% for 2014 and later.

Comments

douglaslee's picture
douglaslee 3 years 43 weeks ago
#1

Why would the current numbnuts ever adopt the 90% standard, just because it's their saviour's legacy. Maybe they are spooked by the fact that Ronald Wilson Reagan in numerology is 666.

Add comment

Login or register to post comments

Currently Chatting

Community Archive

Why the Web of Life is Dying...

Could you survive with just half of your organs? Think about it. What if you had just half your brain, one kidney, half of your heart, one lung, half a liver and only half of your skin? It would be pretty hard to survive right? Sure, you could survive losing just one kidney or half of your liver, but at some point, losing pieces from all of your organs would be too much and you would die.