shifting cost back and forth will only help the tax man and who can afford the inflation. Big subsidies for fuel replacement technology is key but who then can compete with oil that only costs 8 bucks to pump from arab oil fields? or cheap "unnatural gas". Speaking of methane, it is so much worse than co2 right? Tax methane please! if co2 is the problem why can we desimate forests that sequester it, and then expect a machine to to the same thing. (sir dick branson's solution). Many answers for such a small problem: electric not the answer is it not a crazy thing to burn fossil fuels to make electricity to replace fossil fuel, me so confused.

nojokee

Comments

Add comment

Login or register to post comments

Latest Headlines

2nd & 4th Husband of KY Clerk who denies issuing Same-Sex Marriage Licenses says “I’m a redneck hillbilly”

By: Joshua De Leon Josh de Leon is a writer and researcher with Ring of Fire www.ringofireradio.com

Guatemalan President Resigns

The depth of the alleged corruption is shocking

Uzbekistan apparently just banned political science studies

Uzbekistan is also known to take aim at pop stars and other cultural figures because the government says they’re not “patriotic” enough

Community Archive

NPR Needs To Clean Up Their House

What happens when the news media stops covering news objectively - and instead becomes a source of very specific opinions that serve a very narrow agenda?

For example - in the case of the democratic primary - consider the news coverage of the mere possibility of Vice President Joe Biden challenging Hillary Clinton for the Democratic Party's nomination for president.