shifting cost back and forth will only help the tax man and who can afford the inflation. Big subsidies for fuel replacement technology is key but who then can compete with oil that only costs 8 bucks to pump from arab oil fields? or cheap "unnatural gas". Speaking of methane, it is so much worse than co2 right? Tax methane please! if co2 is the problem why can we desimate forests that sequester it, and then expect a machine to to the same thing. (sir dick branson's solution). Many answers for such a small problem: electric not the answer is it not a crazy thing to burn fossil fuels to make electricity to replace fossil fuel, me so confused.

nojokee

Comments

Add comment

Login or register to post comments

Latest Headlines

Who rejected United States-North Korea peace talks?

There were conflicting reports on Sunday regarding a recent proposal for United States-North Korea peace talks which was allegedly made before North Korea"s recent nuclear test

U.K. Pound Falls As Markets Get Brexit Jitters

Bloomberg said on Monday the pound had sustained its biggest fall against the dollar in 11 months

Clinton: I'll defend Israel but push for 'two-state solution

Hillary Clinton believes both Republican candidates Donald Trump and Ted Cruz "missed the mark" with their approach to the Israel-Palestinian Arab conflict

Community Archive

Fukushima wake up call

Here is the Fukushima wake up call - will it go unheard?