It is clear that restricting any kind of weapon violates the 2nd amendment. Isn't it equally as clear that restricting a loner's right to open fire in a theater a restriction of 1st amendment rights? If corporations are people, and money is free speech, isn't hot lead free speech as well? We have gotta protect our constitutional "freedoms".

Comments

Alberto Ceras 3 years 5 weeks ago
#1

Absolutely. Everyone above the age of six should be required to own and to carry a Glock plus an AK47, particularly when attending movies. That's what the 2nd amendment is all about.

Add comment

Login or register to post comments

Latest Headlines

2nd & 4th Husband of KY Clerk who denies issuing Same-Sex Marriage Licenses says “I’m a redneck hillbilly”

By: Joshua De Leon Josh de Leon is a writer and researcher with Ring of Fire www.ringofireradio.com

Guatemalan President Resigns

The depth of the alleged corruption is shocking

Uzbekistan apparently just banned political science studies

Uzbekistan is also known to take aim at pop stars and other cultural figures because the government says they’re not “patriotic” enough

Community Archive

NPR Needs To Clean Up Their House

What happens when the news media stops covering news objectively - and instead becomes a source of very specific opinions that serve a very narrow agenda?

For example - in the case of the democratic primary - consider the news coverage of the mere possibility of Vice President Joe Biden challenging Hillary Clinton for the Democratic Party's nomination for president.