It is clear that restricting any kind of weapon violates the 2nd amendment. Isn't it equally as clear that restricting a loner's right to open fire in a theater a restriction of 1st amendment rights? If corporations are people, and money is free speech, isn't hot lead free speech as well? We have gotta protect our constitutional "freedoms".

Comments

Alberto Ceras 3 years 47 weeks ago
#1

Absolutely. Everyone above the age of six should be required to own and to carry a Glock plus an AK47, particularly when attending movies. That's what the 2nd amendment is all about.

Add comment

Login or register to post comments

Latest Headlines

Who rejected United States-North Korea peace talks?

There were conflicting reports on Sunday regarding a recent proposal for United States-North Korea peace talks which was allegedly made before North Korea"s recent nuclear test

U.K. Pound Falls As Markets Get Brexit Jitters

Bloomberg said on Monday the pound had sustained its biggest fall against the dollar in 11 months

Clinton: I'll defend Israel but push for 'two-state solution

Hillary Clinton believes both Republican candidates Donald Trump and Ted Cruz "missed the mark" with their approach to the Israel-Palestinian Arab conflict

Community Archive

Here's What's the Matter with Kansas…

The verdict is in, and it's time for conservatives to face the cold hard facts.

Right-wing trickle-down Reaganomics doesn't work.

It doesn't work internationally, it doesn't work nationally, and it doesn't work at the state level.