It is clear that restricting any kind of weapon violates the 2nd amendment. Isn't it equally as clear that restricting a loner's right to open fire in a theater a restriction of 1st amendment rights? If corporations are people, and money is free speech, isn't hot lead free speech as well? We have gotta protect our constitutional "freedoms".


Alberto Ceras 3 years 17 weeks ago

Absolutely. Everyone above the age of six should be required to own and to carry a Glock plus an AK47, particularly when attending movies. That's what the 2nd amendment is all about.

Add comment

Login or register to post comments

Latest Headlines

Obama to veto legislation on refugee screening

President Barack Obama would veto a Republican bill introduced in the wake of the Paris attacks to toughen the screening process for Syrian refugees

New York officials: No credible ISIS threat against city

There is no credible threat to New York City at this time, officials said

China denies torturing political prisoners

A Chinese delegation denied mistreatement of prisoners held in police stations and deaths in custody

Community Archive

Why the Kochs Really Embraced Criminal Justice Reform...

It looks like the Koch brothers have scammed us once again.

When news first came out that Charles and David Koch -- the Koch brothers -- were supporting criminal justice reform efforts in Congress, many of us thought, "Wow, they're actually doing something good for once."

And for good reason, too.