Does anyone need more proof that this man is whacked?

Watch video below, via MSNBC:

Maddow Hammers ‘Crack Pot’ Alex Jones’ Oklahoma Tornado ‘Weather Weapon’ Conspiracy Theory

Pointing to Jones’ attempts to prove that everything from the Newtown shooting to the Boston bombing to 9/11 were staged by the government, Maddow said the InfoWars world sees conspiracy in “every tragedy.” So is it really that much of a surprise that they now conspiracy in the Oklahoma tornado?

Maddow played a clip of Jones saying of Monday’s tornado, “I don’t know if this was a weather weapon or not,” suggesting that the government has the ability “create and steer groups of tornadoes.”

“Alex Jones should be disqualified from participating in Republican Party politics,” Maddow said. “He crack pot theories shouldn’t prompt hearings in Congress and inspire actual legislation.” She urged Republicans to stop taking Jones seriously and stop appearing on his radio show. “Can we agree that it’s over now, Republicans?” MORE HERE: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/maddow-hammers-crack-pot-alex-jones-oklahoma-tornado-weather-weapon-conspiracy-theory/

Images

Alex Jones Claims The Government Steered the Oklahoma Tornado To A Densely Populated Area

Videos

See video

Comments

Natural Lefty's picture
Natural Lefty 1 year 14 weeks ago
#1

I am not surprised, Thinking Blue. I already knew that Alex Jones was whacked. The tragic thing is that many naive, often well-intentioned people are being sucked in by his crazy theories and actually believe them.

The very idea the the government would steer a storm toward a populated area in order to kill random people is ridiculous and slanderous to say the least.

leighmf's picture
leighmf 1 year 14 weeks ago
#2

About as ridiculous as dropping 2 atomic bombs?

As ridiculous as Deutsche Investment Managed Climate Change?

nora's picture
nora 1 year 14 weeks ago
#3

By the way, it appears the film of the tornado included in the above video window is the TIMELAPSE version. Note how long the tornado is active even in this timelapse film. The actual one-to-two mile wide tornado was on the ground around Moore, Oklahoma, for what? over 20 minutes? THAT sounds like an technologically enhanced weather system to me.

Yet is is very easy to show a timelapse video of a tornado zooming about with funny sound effects without identifying the timelapse. So just realize, that was not what that giant killer wind funnel really looked (or sounded) like in real time. It moved slowly -- or is the more appropriate word "thoroughly" -- which was why so little was left recognizeable in its path. Quite like a tornado bomb, no?

nora's picture
nora 1 year 14 weeks ago
#4

Articles on weather weaponry noted at this website--

http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1197.cfm

[excerpt]

NEWS BRIEF: Did you know that a law has been on the books since the late 1960's to forbid anyone from using Weather Modification techniques unless they received specific permission from the Federal Government? You can read all about this law by going to http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/15/330.shtml

This law is "U.S. C. TITLE 15 -- SECTION 33 -- COMMERCE AND TRADE, Chapter 9A -- Weather Modification Activities or Attempts -- Reporting".

Again, we have to ask the question, "why is it necessary to have such a law unless you have the technology"? Is Weather Control technology so commonplace that such a law is necessary? After all, this law presupposes that people other than the Federal Government can alter or control the weather, because it forbids such activity by private individuals or companies.

The answer is, "Yes", and we turn to a most unusual place to prove that Weather Control is so common it can be carried out by people or organizations not connected to the Federal Government! Several Russian corporations are openly advertising to farmers that they have the capability to change the weather up to 200 miles for farmers, for a fee of course! ("Weather Control Video: A Report to the U.S. Senate, by Bob Fletcher)

If you research the information concerning this U.S. bill, you will discover a very interesting fact: the funding for the enforcement of this law expired in 1988. It was precisely this year that Dr. Nick Begich wrote that funding went into deep the Black Budget, extremely secret funding so that the much greater potential of a system called HAARP could be established in Alaska ["Angels Don't Play This HAARP: Advances In Tesla Technology"].

NEWS BRIEF: "Weather Modification As A Future Weapon: The Military May Have Added The Weather To Its Arsenal", by Louise A. Purrett, Science News, April 15, 1972, Vol. 101, page 255.

"Both intentionally and by accident, man has discovered ways to alter the weather ... In 1968, Gordon J.F. MacDonald, a geophysicist who is now a member of the President's Council on Environmental Quality [President Nixon], described possible military applications of weather modification in a chapter of the book, 'Unless Peace Comes'. " Louise Purrett then lists some of the devastating weather that can be produced:

[end excerpt]

nora's picture
nora 1 year 14 weeks ago
#5

Did Maddow do her homework? Does Maddow think Jones is a Republican? I thought he is more like a Libertarian.

More to the point -- Maddow is a big fan/friend of Bzerzinski, so she should have a better handle on international stuff. And she was a Cecil Rhodes Scholar, too, so she should know what is available or forbidden for use in the imperialists' arsenal. I think it is bizarre that Maddow allowed herself TO LOOK CLUELESS on the very real topic of WEATHER MODIFICATION AS WEAPONRY.

If Maddow wants to be a JOURNALIST, she would do better to talk about the topic as the realworld FACT it is, rather than use Jones' comment as another opportunity to be no more than a MEDIA MATTERS talking point repeater.

Of course WEATHER MODIFICATION can be weaponized. That is why there is an international treaty against using WEATHER MODIFICATION AS WEAPONRY, like in this UN treaty below--

http://www.scribd.com/doc/3436120/UN-1976-Weather-Weapon-Treaty

[excerpt]

UNGA RES. 31/72, TIAS 9614CONVENTION ON THE PROHIBITION OF MILITARY OR ANY OTHER HOSTILE USE OFENVIRONMENTAL MODIFICATION TECHNIQUES Adopted by Resolution 31/72 of the United Nations General Assembly on 10 December 1976.The Convention was opened for signature at Geneva on 18 May 1977.


TEXT PUBLISHED IN: United Nations General Assembly Resolution 31/72, Annex; seeOfficial Records of the General Assembly, Thirty-first Session, Supplement No. 39 (A/31/39),pp. 37-38. International Legal Materials, Vol. XVI, No. 1, January 1977, pp. 88-94 (Engl.);World Armaments and Disarmament, SIPRI Yearbook 1978, London 1978, pp. 392-397(Engl.); Shindler & Toman, eds., "The Laws of Armed conflict."

[read more at link]

===========================

Why would the USA sign such a treaty if the issue weren't a reality?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_Modification_Convention

===========================

An insider, former defense secretary Cohen, indicates weaponization of weather is not ruled out--

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NYZRr7nl0U

nora's picture
nora 1 year 14 weeks ago
#6

Meteorologist indicates weather control is a taboo subject--

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/post/cnn-interv...

[excerpt]

Blitzer’s introduction to the broadcast video was, “some meteorologists are suggesting there could be a way to stop killer twisters like the one we saw in Joplin, Missouri, potentially, before they happen”. The otherwise unidentified “some meteorologists” were represented (unbeknownst to me at the time of my interview) by Joe Golden. In fact, I had no idea what he had to say until the actual broadcast.

Barbara’s first on-air question was, “amid the tragedy of the recent tornadoes” …”is there anything we can do about the weather?” As edited, Joe answered first stating that, “what we’re talking about in terms of tornado modification is taboo in meteorology. A lot of my scientific colleagues are very reluctant to even talk about it.”

When watching the broadcast I couldn’t help think, as discussed in my previous post, the vast majority of scientists view the topic as “taboo” only because it’s folly to take the possibility seriously. But, before I continue with that thought, Joe continued, “it’s feasible” and later added “stopping tornadoes is serious business.”

...

Joe was a lead in the research program on modifying hurricanes supported by a grant from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). NOAA rejected the DHS proposal to partner (“buy into”) with the DHS program.

...

[read more at link]

nora's picture
nora 1 year 14 weeks ago
#7

Rachel Maddow thinks weather modification is hogwash? She can read how the Dept. of HOMELAND Security is dabbling in weather modification. And on Oct. 30, 2012 Obama ordered DHS to pursue hurricane "control". What's to look into if technology isn't in existence?

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/134531962/Obama-Ordered-DHS-to-Control-Hurri...

DdC's picture
DdC 1 year 14 weeks ago
#8

Maddow is a shill for democrats, getting paid by General Electric. The MSM needed a counterbalance to the whacko's at Faux so they came up with MSNBC and Keith Olbermann. Who ask the wrong politically correct questions and occasional replacement Maddow got her turn. Nothing but a mouth piece countering anything nonobama. Including Alex Jones and the libertopians.

Has she never heard of salting or seeding the clouds with silver nitrate to produce rain? Why would so called progressives concern themselves over global warming if they believed humans couldn't change the weather? Ever hear of the dust bowls? Or tsunami's that was caused by the Japanese earthquake, could have been just as easily placed nukes where producing the wave could be directed. I see no logical reason to dismiss weather weapons although I don't really think this was the case. Other than practice, why wipe out a bunch of rednecks? They do a good enough job on themselves. Okies still have 93 year prison sentences for growing pot. My hope is the Grapes of Wrath Jodes and their ilk landing in CA, go back home. Free Bakersfield!

BEACHED WHALES, SONAR AND THE U.S. NAVY
Researchers have found that powerful sonar used to search for submarines—which environmentalists say reaches 215 decibels—may harm whales and dolphins. Low-frequency active sonar can produce vibrations equivalent to a jet fighter taking off while those in the midfrequency range produce sound equal to a rocket.

Maddow & MSNBC GE MSM
General Electric is the world's largest nuclear component manufacturer. Not Liberal nukes either.
The Corporate Muzzle
The inbedwith dis-infotainment: Gaza to Iraq

Cannabis Shrinks Tumors: Government Knew in 74. Now just because they would hide potential remedies for your loved ones dying of cancer tumors. Doesn't mean they would direct a tornado towards Okies.

The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment was when they shot up prisoners with Syphlis just to see what it would do. Again, these were black prisoners in the south, not much of a conspiracy. Just your typical mass murder of minorities.

Cover-Ups, Prevarications, Subversions & Sabotage

Constitutional GOPerversions & Their Pathetic Apologists

Scientists Re-Re-Re-Discover Cannabis Stops Metastasis In Aggressive Cancers!
Free and Open Scientific Inquiry?
Cancer in the Family

DdC's picture
DdC 1 year 14 weeks ago
#9

The Uses of Cloud Seeding

Since its invention in 1946, cloud seeding has entered the history books: Americans seeded clouds to extend the monsoon over the Ho Chi Minh Trail from 1967 to 1972 during the Vietnam War, and Russians seeded clouds over Belarus in 1986 to stop radioactive particles reaching Moscow after the Chernobyl nuclear disaster.

The potential for weather warfare has led to 75 countries signing the United Nation’s Environmental Modification Convention since its launch on October 5, 1978 under the name of the ‘Convention on the Prohibition of Military or any other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification’ (ENMOD). While this allows citizens to use weather modification for peaceful purposes, most countries enforce strict licenses and rules for anyone wishing to do so.

Hemp 'Eats' Chernobyl Waste
http://endingcannabisprohibition.yuku.com/topic/668

nora's picture
nora 1 year 13 weeks ago
#10

As someone pointed out at another weather blog--

The ENMOD control Treaty above seems to apply only to one country using weather modification as a weapon against another country. But the Treaty does not forbid a government's use of weather weapons on its own citizens.

?

Which reminds me, the USA government DID test its Germ Warfare materials on the American people numerous times. (And, for anyone who thinks biotech experiments started with Monsanto and Friends GMO experiments alone, it is necessary to go back further and realize our own government agencies were the vanguard with these corporations (both of whom utilized our universities via grants) to develop and create new, more crazy, virulent and deadly bioforms.)

Truthseaker's picture
Truthseaker 1 year 13 weeks ago
#11

Rachel Madow must be despite if she is finding out what Alex Jones is saying about the OK Tornado. She should investigate Harvey Winstein. The big time Democratic fun raiser goo-woo. He was one of the biggest Adult Porn Publishers. Its said his company travels overseas to Russia and other counties; pays underage girls to pose nude in his magazines and do his films and sells them as Art. How about Larry Flint. Remember he was going to pay anyone for nude pictures of Monica Lewinsky and Bristol Palin and Sarah Palin a million dollars.

Natural Lefty's picture
Natural Lefty 1 year 13 weeks ago
#12

I think it's obvious that humans affect the climate. Certainly we do as an unintentional byproduct of human activities, and I believe that there are programs to intentionally alter weather, if for no other reason than to try to undo the damage we have done, but to leap from that idea to the idea that people intentionally steered a tornado into a town is a drastic step and makes no sense to me.

I don't think Rachel Maddow denies climate change or that there are attempts to affect the climate being carried out, perhaps in secret. I have no idea where any of you (Leigh, Nora or DdC) get that idea. It seems to come out of nowhere. Why do you bash Rachel Maddow and unwittingly defend a nutcase like Alex Jones? I don't get it. Are you wearing aluminum hats like Jones to keep the Illuminati from reading your minds?

DdC's picture
DdC 1 year 13 weeks ago
#13

Appeasing Maddow is why Conservatudes rule. No one said a thing about Maddow except she cashes her paycheck from General Electric. One of the biggest tax dodgers on the planet. No one is siding with Alex Jones by countering Maddow's appeasement of the Neocons when she denies government actions and leaves us to think its just a nutjob's rants. The government did what we posted it did and I have more to follow. Deal with it. Stop doing the same thing lumping me with teabaggers. The government is run by Wall St and really doesn't care about political parties. Maddow does us a disservice by dismissing atrocities and blaming a conspirator.The same way they hold their hands out collecting on the Ganjawar while holding their noses garnishing votes. Enough of the MSM hypocrites.

"Through clever and constant application of propaganda, people can be made to see paradise as hell, and also the other way around, to consider the most wretched sort of life as paradise."
Benito Mussolini,
London Sunday Express, December 8, 1935

Ultimate corporate bailout - Price Anderson - nukes

SCAPEGOATING -
Blaming social problems on a cultural, racial, or behaviorial group.

PREJUDICE -
Selling the public on the idea that all members of the targeted group are 'bad' people.

Cheney's Legacy of Fracking America to Death

LIES -
'Facts', which cannot be verified, and pseudo scientific studies are used as propaganda against the targeted group. History is rewritten.

NO PUBLIC DEBATE -
"These people have no right to have their viewpoiunt aired." and " Anyone who disagrees or questions us must be one of them!"

Al Capone and Watergate

DEHUMANIZATION -
Characterizing all members of a targeted group as subhuman and typically capable of monstrous deeds and/or crimes.

PROTECT OUR CHILDREN -
"They corrupt, seduce and or destroy our children."

AEC, DOE, NRC, Nuclear Murderers by David Proctor
Americas Atomic War Against Its Citizens and Why Its Not Over Yet
After 15 years of investigating, I have concluded that the United States governments atomic weapons industry knowingly and recklessly exposed millions of people to dangerous levels of radiation. Nothing in our past compared to the official deceit and lying that took place in order to protect the nuclear industry. In the name of national security, politicians and bureaucrats ran roughshod over democracy and morality. Ultimately, the Cold Warriors were willing to sacrifice their own people in their zeal to beat the Russians.

Reefer Madness, Anslinger, Hearst,
Bayer, FarbenII Cannabis Demonization

If... the machine of government...
is of such a nature that it requires you
to be the agent of injustice to another,
then, I say, break the law.
~ Henry David Thoreau,
On the Duty of Civil Disobediance, 1849

I.G.Farben,Dupont,Ford,Hearst,
Frankenfoods & Cannabis Prohibition

Be on gaurd against science without humanity, Politics without principle, Knowledge without character, Wealth without work, Commerce without morality, Pleasure without conscience, And worship without sacrifice.
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi

Starving Babies and Illegal Food

CIVIL LIBERTIES SACRIFICED -
"We must give up some of our freedoms, liberties, and rights in order to combat this menace to society."

Cannabis: The Next Diabetes Drug?

LEGAL DESCRIMINATION -
Laws criminalize members of targeted group and they may be denied jobs, the right to own property and/or be restricted as to where they may live or go.

Thalidomide v Cannabis
In January, a thalidomide developer, Celgene, of Warren, New Jersey, announced that the data from its trial in 99 people with AIDS wasting showed a statistically significant weight gain. The company seems to have "jumped the gun," as one person close to the trial put it. No data were yet available from the trial to justify Celgene's press release.

Anslinger-Bush-Hearst-
Nixon-Hitler-Déjà vu

INFORMERS -
Citizens are urged to 'turn in' friends, neighbors, co-workers and family members.

SECRET POLICE -
Non-uniformed police squads set up to wage war on targeted groups utilizing deception, infiltration, espionage and entrapment.

Many Veterans are the Enemy in the D.E.A.th War

CONFISCATION OF PROPERTY -
Property and assets are seized from people who are members of targeted group. Property may be divided between the informer and the state.

Why Do You Think They Call it DOPE?
* Cannabis Hemp: The Invisible Prohibition Revealed
* The Elkhorn Manifesto
* Marijuana and Hemp: The Untold Story
* The Nation of Apathetic Puppets By John Pilger
* Maintaining Dysfunction

REMOVAL FROM SOCIETY -
Prisons, rehabilitation camps, 'hospitals', executions and genocide...
"Zero Tolerance"

nora's picture
nora 1 year 13 weeks ago
#14

I did not say anything about Maddow's beliefs about "climate change" regarding the Maddow video clip above. I assumed she backs the Al Gore cap and trade, carbon exchange "solution" to global warming.

My point is Maddow said alot of things in that video clip that made her look clueless to the facts of weather modification being a reality, and weaponized weather modification being such a reality that the UN felt the necessity to pass a treaty about it. Is she a well-informed journalist, a disingenuous media personality or what?

And her comments about Alex Jones' positions on topics were pure demonization and misinformation:

1. Maddow tells her viewers that Jones says the massacre at Sandy Hook, Connecticut and the massacre at Aurora, Colorado "were fake". At her most extreme, Maddow's choice of words seem to indicate Jones is possibly denying that anyone died at these events, and perhaps some viewers who never heard a Jones' radio show or seen one of his films might think that was true. But I've never heard Jones' say these events "were fake" or "were faked". On the contrary, he despairs that more loss of life has occurred -- and that these terrible occurrences are followed by such strange behavior by the authorities and by what he considers some questionable conclusions by authorities. Maddow's incorrect representation of Jones' positions just makes Maddow look foolish and makes her reports LESS THAN FACT-BASED. Not good.

[A 'false flag' event, or using agent(s) provocateur, or a staged event using a patsy -- these are NOT "fake" events. ILLUSIONIST perhaps, but not unreal. I see Jones' queries on these events as merely following the same path of questioning applied in the assassinations of JFK and RFK -- both of whom authorities claimed were murdered by lone assassins, EVEN THOUGH each horrible murder was replete with proof that the number of discharged bullets was IN EXCESS of the capabilities of the lone assassins' murder weapons; and so on it goes with the messiness of the official stories. When "official" evidence is like Swisscheese -- full of holes -- it invites questioning. Jones and his guests examine those questions, and cast doubt on The Authorities who insist on preserving the "official story" no matter what.]

2. Maddow said Jones makes claims that the Boston Marathon bombing "was faked". She does it again. Jones only questions the official story. [Indeed, in journalism, asking questions of the authorities as an adversary is an important role of journalists of a Free Press. Just accepting ANYTHING the authorities dish out is not Journalism; that is only EMBEDDEDNESS or being an INFORMATION BAGMAN/BAGWOMAN, being one of the authorities minions.]

3. I don't know what Jones said about the Columbia space shuttle failure. But I doubt Jones said the Oklahoma City federal building explosion "never happened" as Maddow claims in the video because I've heard shows where he has interviewed researchers who discuss the details of the event, details which the authorities ignored -- early news reports, eyewitness reports, the phenomenon of certain offices of federal agents being completely empty at the time of the explosion and all the officers safely outside, and the evidence of unexploded munitions attached to inner building supports, and the removal of evidence. Again, these are questions that should be addressed in some way. Evidently, Maddow did not do her homework.

4. Maddow also said that Jones "knows and sells the idea that 9/11 was an inside job". And she says this in such a dismissive tone, it is hard NOT to detect a message there that anyone who dares NOT accept the official story of 9/11 SHOULD be demonized as she is demonizing Jones. SHEESH. Jones is NOT alone in questioning the official 9/11 Commission Report. Even some of the commissioners have regrets. And there are engineers, physics specialists, and hi-rise architects who have questions, too. And research into the presence in the Twin Towers debris/dust of a type of THERMITE available only to the military and useable for rapid demolition raises questions about the free-fall collapse of The Twin Towers One and Two and World Trade Center Building Seven. I myself would like to know why the records of the Securities and Exchange Commission offices in WTC Building Seven were not recoverable and legal prosecutions of criminal financial cases continued despite the collapse. Those records didn't burn; they were just part of the rubble of the collapse. right? Questions. Questions. I think asking questions is a good thing. Does Maddow? And does she realize that when she advocates for the shoddy official 9/11 story, and leaves questions hanging, she makes herself sound like a mouthpiece for the authorities, instead of sounding like a journalist?]

5. Maddow closes saying: "Jones says the [Moore] tornado is a conspiracy." I didn't hear that in the clip of Jones himself speaking. He actually said he DIDN'T know. Why is Maddow's interpretation so incorrect? And if Maddow's trusting viewers now believe and repeat the incorrect things she said -- that is a very sad thing because it will mean they stopped THEIR questioning and stopped THEIR quest for the facts while being entertained by the Rachel Maddow Show.

Natural Lefty's picture
Natural Lefty 1 year 13 weeks ago
#15

I don't watch the Rachel Maddow show. I don't even get cable. But it doesn't take a Rachel Maddow expert to tell that the responses I have seen here favor conspiratorialists such as Alex Jones and his nutty brand of libertarianism, over what seems to me a more reasonable and what should be a more agreeable progressive approach. Alex Jones in my opinion is trying to drive the United States toward a Teabagger type civil war. At least Maddow isn't trying to do that.

And yes, for Jones, every disaster is cause for him suggesting that it was manufactured by the government, as a "false flag," whether or not he says he is sure of what happened. It's hard to imagine anyone being more slanderous, untruthful or intentionally provacative than that.

DdC's picture
DdC 1 year 13 weeks ago
#16

conspiratorialists?

There she goes again, oh Lefty you should know better. Buzzwords remove the unsightly baggage from the viewers, without losing the hidden message. The details are left to the viewer to conjure up. To match the title or buzzword. "Marijuana" was originally used to demonize Poncho Villa, by Hearst headlines stigmatizing him. Using his wife and mothers names to relate him to the heathen acts or hype of dancing on tables and drinking tequila, smoking colitas. Poncho's "men" had women "marijane". Servicing his men, demonized as modern prostitutes in Tijuana donkey-bars. According to Hearst, was reason enough to send Purshing into Mexico and waste a years taxes trying to flush him out. Settling for assassination, a convenience of politics when all else fails. Then when Hemp became a problem for Dupont's crude oil fiber and Rockefellers crude oil and Bayer Pharmaceuticals. The word was then used to demonize users. With the same tactics of yellow journalism coined against the Chinese immigrants before that. With the same goal and results of alcohol prohibition removing the farmers stills used for ethanol to fuel their tractors. Gutting maintenance on electric trollies, bringing in more crude oil sales sold to buses and trains. Enron learned and did the same to CA power stations causing brown outs, grey outs and arno's in. Then more Browne...

Lipstick on a Pig...

Why Do YOU Think They Call it DOPE?
* Cannabis Hemp: The Invisible Prohibition Revealed
* The Elkhorn Manifesto
* Marijuana and Hemp: The Untold Story
* The Nation of Apathetic Puppets By John Pilger
* Maintaining Dysfunction

When Maddow discredits or kills the message by killing the messenger and practices the same broadcast as any other denialist. I take offense at her and her appeasers. Alex Jones is trying to be a celebrity like 100's of others starting with Rush and Beck and if Palin isn't obvious there is no spark left in the minds failing to see this for what it is. A side show. To deny the reality of the money influence on the so called government is naive and most of the time naive by administration. I bring proof everyday about known virtues of Ganja and Hemp and not many question why they didn't learn this in grade school? Or at least medical school. Oh well drugs are badmmm Just say mmmm

FIBRE PLANTS, HEMP,
from The Children's Encyclopedia,1909; pp. 321-324

NEW BILLION-DOLLAR CROP
Popular Mechanics February, 1938

Granny Storm Crow's MMJ List
Endocannabinoids

The powers that be are not buzzwords like illuminate or free masons or just the koch bros. and Rockefellers. The not hard to conceive of, world banksters and international corporations are showing us what they want. For not just America they have no allegiance too. The planet as one country, 180* from what Lennon dreamed of, One People is another dream not prudent at this juncture. Tiered justice seems ok as it is with the masses, concerning the Ganjawar. Most don't care. Its not a gay fetus or a threat to wage police actions on foreigners. Or whining about taxes except the Trillion spent not stopping people from toking a doobie. Tax spent evicting families and cutting unemployment from outsourced jobs never mentioned but no one sees a connection. Polluting commodities that could be replaced by Hemp if not for the uncaring. The NIMBY crowds and Xenophobes and seudo-patriotic wearing their own team colors, assuring dysfunction for generations.

Or like I've been doing since hitting the left coast during Bush HQ. Breaking the law helping quadriplegics light their bongs. Or previous AIDs patients relieve wasting syndrome symptoms. Giving them the munchies isn't a scientific discovery worthy of top secret status anymore than THC shrinking brain tumors or seniors getting a restful sleep without the chemically induced nightmares from the legal Strychnine. I sleep very well.

Cannabis Shrinks Tumors: Government Knew in 74
The DEA quickly shut down the Virginia study and all further cannabis/tumor research...

Hemplastic
or Fossil Fools Crud
OPEC Fossil Fuels vs American Homegrown Bio-diesel

Plastic and Fuel from veggies or crud we fight police actions over. Honest. Even without a TV you had to have heard of the Iraq scam. These are done by government officials following Wall St profits. Selling the tools of the trade and protecting investments. Especially from competition. Something most know they do regularly with undercutting, outsourcing, scabs and prison slave labor. Legislating profits outlawing competition is crossing the line? We nuked two cities and radiated thousands if not millions of Americans around test sights and "experimental" programs. This is documented as well as Tuskegee, Clinton apologized for. To dismiss the message because the envelope has mud is foolhardy if truth is what is sought. If you can't discern the message with physical laws and proven History and have to rely on an interpreter. Then make sure they are non-bias or the message you receive will be propaganda and not truth or factual.

If its not truth then it can not be evidence or a foundation to build society or fabricate wars for profits. If you simply trash the message because of the mud on the envelope. You will only aid the dysfunctional system most mainstream parties seem to not be aware of. Or at least when its convenient. Jones doesn't matter and without evidence I see no reason to believe this Tornado was directed or produced by human hands. That doesn't mean I believe they don't have the capability and a History of diabolical deeds perpetrated on their own citizens. Mostly racial and class. Today's cold war is the Ganjawar with the same bigotry, degradation and shunning to more draconian incarcerations, forced rehabilitation asylums and stealing of bodily fluids. Banned from government services, jobs and driving. Forfeitured homes, cars, furniture and children and where are the politically correct? Lying alongside of the profiteers. Not your granny's pot or addictive or causes any damage what so ever is pure fabrication with no science base and thousands of years of safe use to the contrary.

Still treated as the witch hunts with unequal punishment dolled out by overzealous SqWat teams. Propaganda lies by SqWat DARE squads. How many fingers have to point to stir people into removing their blinders? MSNBC is General Electric and a division of a corporation never causes business to go elsewhere. Maddow is a spokesperson and if she doesn't follow the program she will follow Olbermann and Schultz... opening doors for new spokespeople, previously filling in as Maddow did for Keith. Maddow is the heads and Fox is the tails of a cardboard coin with no value other than a team mascot would have for a sports team. Playing for the Owners selling the tickets. Local products build communities. Hemp replaces thousands of products outsourced and undercutting prices to drive locals out of business. Same as Big Ag is driving family farmers bankrupt. Not if they had their own cash crop of Hemp. Produced into what communities need. Without the Wall St / DC Beast. We can't kill it but we can put it on a diet for a more manageable beast. The Ganjawar is a clear microcosm of things to come unless people recognize vested ignorance from reality the middle class will cease to exist. Labor is less overseas, less labor equals less overhead and more profits. Thats it.

We are living in a science-fiction nightmare where children are gasping for breath on bad-air days because somebody gave money to a politician. And my children and the kids of millions of other Americans can no longer go fishing and eat their catch because somebody gave money to a politician.
~ Robert F. Kennedy, Jr

Add comment

Login or register to post comments

Currently Chatting

Community Archive

The GOP war on workers has killed again...

It’s time to stop the conservative's war on working people in America.

Since the birth of our nation, conservatives have always been wary of average working-class Americans having too much political or economic power. John Adams, the second President of the United States and a Federalist (precursor to today’s Republicans), was very wary of the working class, which he referred to as “the rabble.”