The data is in: Unions work very, very well for workers!

It's official, unions are still very, very good for workers. According to not one, but two new reports, collective bargaining is the best way tool we have to raise wages and increase opportunity for workers.

The first report was released by The Center for American Progress on Wednesday, and it focused on economic mobility and “the ability to improve upon the economic situation of one's birth.”

The authors of that study found, “a strong relationship between union membership and inter-generational mobility.” In other words, children who grew up in union households were more likely to lead a better life than their parents.

The other analysis, which was released Friday by the AFL-CIO's Center for Strategic Research, draws a clear line between union membership and higher wages.

Separately, and together, these reports show how important it is to protect our collective bargaining rights, and why we should celebrate when workers declare a victory.

According to the AFL-CIO report, in the first half of 2015, workers who bargained for new contracts saw an average wage increase of 4.3%. And, despite the Right's best efforts, even more employees will fight to form unions in the upcoming year.

Richard Trumka, president of the AFL-CIO, said, “This report provides clear evidence that joining a union and bargaining with your employer is the most effective way to give workers the power to raise their own wages.” He added, “When working people speak with one voice, our economy is stronger, and all workers do better.”

The Republican war on unions hasn't stopped people from organizing, but we need to fight hard to make sure our collective bargaining rights don't disappear.

Comments

arky12's picture
arky12 3 years 44 weeks ago
#1

My comment is not on what you wrote, but what I read in Daily Kos today about the Evangelical response to Bernie's speech at Liberty University. It is authored by Vinvalke and titled An Evangelical Response to Sanders' speech at Liberty U. Within this partial comment from a Liberty alumni minister is a link for an audio of his sermon/speech about how Bernie impacted him. It is brilliant and shows how Bernie is getting through to all people. He actually said this "wild haired Jew" reminded him of John the Baptist crying in the wilderness and on and on. If you listen to the audio, he starts out with his own history and that of Liberty and Evangelicals and just before the 7 minute mark talks about Bernie. It would be great if you could download this audio and take clips from it to air on your show.

gopherindian's picture
gopherindian 3 years 44 weeks ago
#2

Very good article on Unions. I shared it with my union leadership and they forwarded it to staff. I work in a public office.

Regarding your comments on Bernie Sanders:

Give him a break. Bernie has been one of the few politicians who frequents talk radio shows and takes calls from callers directly. Most people DO know who he is. Turn that rhetoric around. Bernie is farly well known.

a_liberalwomun's picture
a_liberalwomun 3 years 44 weeks ago
#3

I also d/loaded the clip. I'm a bit suspicious though......never know when the opposition will strike.

1. The message was encouraging that maybe other Christians hold that view

2. What bothers me, is that this person goes by his first name only "Jim". If you are for all he says, then as a Christian, it would be "christ-like" to declare that. It could easily be a plant to discredit Bernie's campaign. Just saying......that everything goes in politics.

I will post what I researched after getting that clip at Daily Kos.

https://clyp.it/eusxalwe 16 min Audio clip

http://www.dailykos.com/story/...

https://www.reddit.com/r/Sande...

http://discussionist.com/10155...

LW

Willie W's picture
Willie W 3 years 44 weeks ago
#4

Unions do work. They are what built the middle class. Unions address the needs of the many, which interferes with the unbridled greed of the powerful few.

RLTOWNSLEY's picture
RLTOWNSLEY 3 years 44 weeks ago
#5

I support Labor Unions but they remain tied to a Democrat Party that joined with the Right twenty five years ago to get a piece of the massive economic support that Conservatives have long enjoyed from their private financial masters. I've supported Trumka since his rise to the leadership but he continues to ignore the fact that today's Democrat Party tends to keep the Union at arms length to avoid a confrontation with their new friends on the Right ! In general one might ask why the Democrat party has been unable or unwilling to strike down the Taft Hartley Act passed almost seventy years ago that severely limited the ability of the Unions to organize. In the early eighties when the Democrat party still had many of it's progressive pro-union stalwarts in positions of power in Washington, nothing was done to block Reagan's initial attack that sought to break up the Air Traffic Controllers union. Ten years later Clinton wasted no time rubber stamping NAFTA that opened the flood gates for the exporting of living wage manufacturing jobs to foreign low wage sweatshop economies. With friends like the current Democrat leadership, the decline of labor unions was a forgone conclusion !

EvilRichGuy's picture
EvilRichGuy 3 years 44 weeks ago
#6

Unions have worked very well for some workers, but not all. In particular I am thinking of the ones who have been priced out of the market, and have no voice. When an American union worker costs [x] and a foreign worker costs 1/2 of [x] then the job goes offshore.

Or, when freight charges are such that offshoring makes no sense, the product price increases and in some cases the product becomes non-viable.

I don't think it is fair to say that unions are working well when there are so many jobs that have been lost in union industries (like manufacturing) and these people are not included in the surveys.

If you follow the trend line, we'll eventually get to a small number of union workers making a ton of money. Hopefully they'll make enough money that their tax contribution pays for the unemployed workers sitting at home wishing they had jobs.

Gary Reber's picture
Gary Reber 3 years 44 weeks ago
#7

Labor Unions need to transform into Ownership Unions. This would expand the mission of unions (whose private-sector membership has been steadily shrinking) to reach out to and represent all shareholders, including worker-owners of corporations. An Ownership Union is designed to work collaboratively with management to secure financing of advanced technologies and other new capital investments through Capital Homestead Accounts for all citizens. It is intended to represent a growing constituency of worker- and citizen-owners on governance rights issues as well as to help lower all barriers to accelerated and sustainable rates of growth, particularly green growth, in a more democratically accountable corporate and financial sectors. Ultimately, Ownership Unions will shift the source of worker incomes from inflation-inducing wage and benefit increases, to widespread distribution of growing profit and equity incomes to worker- and citizen-owners. This will enable American companies to become more cost-competitive in global markets and to reduce the outsourcing of jobs to workers willing or forced to take lower wages.

One of the proven financial mechanisms to transform workers from labor-only income to dividend-earning income is the powerful ownership-expanding technique, known as the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP). An ESOP provides widespread access to capital credit to each employee in an incorporated company on a systematic basis. Technically, the ESOP uses a legal trust that is “qualified” under specific U.S. tax laws encouraging employee ownership. Fortunately, these laws are extremely flexible, so that each plan can be tailored to fit the circumstances and needs of each enterprise, and deficiencies in the design of an ESOP can easily be corrected.

Over twenty U.S. laws have passed Congress since late 1973 to make ESOPs more attractive to workers and owners. More are on their way. While less than a dozen ESOPs existed in the United States in 1965, today over 10,000 companies, mostly highly profitable small and medium-size firms, have already adopted the ESOP in one form or another, creating over 11 million employee-owners. A number of Fortune 500 companies have adopted ESOPs, including Proctor & Gamble, Texaco, General Mills, Hallmark Cards, and American Standard, thus planting the seed for significant expansion of worker ownership within the giant multinationals.

Overcoming the initial skepticism of organized labor toward employee ownership, the United Steelworkers, the Air Line Pilots Association and the Amalgamated Clothing Workers have strongly endorsed the ESOP concept, and have initiated several model ESOP buyouts.

Walter Reuther, President of the United Auto Workers, expressed his open-mindedness to the goal of democratic worker ownership in his 1967 testimony to the Joint Economic Committee of Congress as a strategy for saving manufacturing jobs in America from being outcompeted by Japan and eventual outsourcing to other Asian countries with far lower wage costs: “Profit sharing in the form of stock distributions to workers would help to democratize the ownership of America’s vast corporate wealth, which is today appallingly undemocratic and unhealthy.

“If workers had definite assurance of equitable shares in the profits of the corporations that employ them, they would see less need to seek an equitable balance between their gains and soaring profits through augmented increases in basic wage rates. This would be a desirable result from the standpoint of stabilization policy because profit sharing does not increase costs. Since profits are a residual, after all costs have been met, and since their size is not determinable until after customers have paid the prices charged for the firm’s products, profit sharing [through wider share ownership] cannot be said to have any inflationary impact on costs and prices.”

Unfortunately for democratic unionism, the United Auto Workers, American manufacturing workers, and American citizens generally, Reuther was killed in an airplane crash in 1970 before his idea was implemented.

An ESOP combines many elements into a single package. It is an employee benefit program. It is an incentive and productivity program for all employees. It is a retirement program. It is a reward system, working best when a modest base salary is supplemented with cash bonuses and equity shares, linked to the proceeds of the operation. It is a two-way accountability and communications system between management and non-management employees. It is a means for workers to participate both as workers and as stockholders in corporate direction. It is an in-house tax-exempt stock exchange, for both new equity issuances and repurchase of outstanding shares. It is a tax-deferred means for workers to accumulate equity. It can offer workers a source of current dividend incomes. An ESOP is all of these and more; but one of its most unique features is that it is a basic innovation in corporate finance.

An ESOP is so far the only tool in the world of investment finance that can generate new sources of capital credit for corporate growth or transfers of ownership, insulate its eventual owners from direct personal risk in the event of default, and allow repayment of its entire debt in pre-tax corporate dollars.

How The ESOP Works

The leveraged ESOP channels capital credit through a trust representing employees, from the same sources and subject to the same feasibility standards and corporate guarantees as direct loans to the corporation. The loan funds are used to buy stock for the workers, either from present owners (a leveraged buyout) or for financing expansion or modernization of the corporation. The ESOP can be used to purchase existing shares from present owners using credit, which is wholly secured by and repaid from future profits.

Normally, the workers make no cash outlay from payroll deductions or their savings, and none of their present savings is at risk. Shares of stock are allocated to the individual accounts of workers only as blocks of shares are “earned,” i.e., the company contributes cash out of future pre-tax profits to the trust. The cash, which is treated as a tax-deductible employee benefit, is used to repay the stock acquisition loan. Whereas traditional uses of leveraged corporate credit work only for present owners, the ESOP uses corporate credit to convert its workers into stockholders. Thus, the magic of self-liquidating capital credit can be used to lift more individuals into an expanding ownership system.

A well-designed ESOP clarifies subtle distinctions between “ownership,” “management,” and “worker participation.” Operationally under an ESOP, day-to-day control would remain in the hands of professional managers who, under a carefully designed system of checks and balances, would simply become accountable to a broader shareholder base, including other workers, and a more broadly representative board of directors. Employee stock ownership, therefore, would involve balancing continuity and efficiency of the firm with justice and accountability for the workers.

What Do Democrats Really Want?

Thom plus logo Thomas Friedman, the confused billionaire, told us decades ago that "free trade" is what made the Lexus a successful product when, in fact, it was decades of Japanese government subsidies and explicit tariffs that did so.

Latest Headlines

Who rejected United States-North Korea peace talks?

There were conflicting reports on Sunday regarding a recent proposal for United States-North Korea peace talks which was allegedly made before North Korea"s recent nuclear test

U.K. Pound Falls As Markets Get Brexit Jitters

Bloomberg said on Monday the pound had sustained its biggest fall against the dollar in 11 months

Clinton: I'll defend Israel but push for 'two-state solution

Hillary Clinton believes both Republican candidates Donald Trump and Ted Cruz "missed the mark" with their approach to the Israel-Palestinian Arab conflict
From The Thom Hartmann Reader:
"Thom Hartmann is a creative thinker and committed small-d democrat. He has dealt with a wide range of topics throughout his life, and this book provides an excellent cross section. The Thom Hartmann Reader will make people both angry and motivated to act."
Dean Baker, economist and author of Plunder and Blunder, False Profits, and Taking Economics Seriously
From The Thom Hartmann Reader:
"With the ever-growing influence of corporate CEOs and their right-wing allies in all aspects of American life, Hartmann’s work is more relevant than ever. Throughout his career, Hartmann has spoken compellingly about the value of people-centered democracy and the challenges that millions of ordinary Americans face today as a result of a dogma dedicated to putting profit above all else. This collection is a rousing call for Americans to work together and put people first again."
Richard Trumka, President, AFL-CIO
From Screwed:
"The powers that be are running roughshod over the powers that OUGHT to be. Hartmann tells us what went wrong — and what you and I can do to help set American right again."
Jim Hightower, National Radio Commentator, Writer, Public Speaker, and author of the bestselling Thieves in High Places