Oh, and in comes the nipping chihuahua for one more round......
Shhh. You'll stroke out.
What now? Are you feigning a concern for my wellbeing now, Ulysses? Like DRC feigned a concern for Abigail Fisher by saying how much DRC 'hoped she had gotten into a good college'....as long as it isn't about individual rights, you and your Kumbaya clan feign a lot of concern, don't you? And, as long as it isn't hate criminals and fetuses we are talking about....Quote Ulysses:
Oh, that. That wasn't a definition. That was a statement of fact. I never offered any definition. You should look up the definition of "definition."
And, that's a 'reasonable' response? So well thought out by the nipping chihuahua....Quote Ulysses:
And, when it comes to really how dishonest you and your clan is, you can't even take it upon yourself to explain how a woman deciding to end her pregnancy is not a 'selfish cause' that is so defined as being an 'individual right' (right in line with my point on this).
What point was that?
What part of that point do you not acknowledge, Ulysses? The point that you and your clan in being all for the woman aborting her fetus (at any stage in the pregnancy) dishonestly not recognizing that as a selfish right (as you claimed how 'selfish' I was in being 'libertarian')--or, the point that I make that, while 'individual rights' are, indeed, 'selfish causes', I see no distinction between a 'community interested in individuality' and 'one who grants individual rights to others as well as acquiring them for oneself'? And, do you acknowledge that now.....Quote Ulysses:
Oh, now, it's not all that serious. I've never judged your capacity as a doctor. I've just always stated, and hereby state again, that I just don't believe that you are one.
And, what qualifications are you using, and what qualifies you, to make that assertion, Ulysses? But, you can't say anything about the Abigail Fisher case, can you? Why not? What distinctions are you reasonably offering about yourself and how you make such judgments that have you make a definite statement on my regard as being a doctor--and none at all on Abigail Fisher's reverse discrimination case no matter how qualified she may be with respect to others accepted into the state-supported institution that is the University of Texas....Quote Ulysses:
It's a far different thing to judge one's capacity when that person is already acting in a capacity than it is to state that you don't believe that person is in that capacity in the first place, as I believe about you. Get your canards straight, ol' hoss.
You're full of it, Ulysses--and have nothing more to offer....
Naw. Wouldn't be honest. Gotta leave that to the admissions officers of the college(s) involved, as drc2 has so ably pointed out.
Then, why do you have a judgment about anything, Ulysses? Is life a 'statistical average' to you? It certainly isn't when you come up with all sorts of excuses to assert why I am not a doctor...but, in Abigail Fisher's case, well, leave that up to the 'experts', right Ulysses? Who, by the way, in the University of Texas' case, get paid by the taxpayers....but, that's not in respect to all taxpayers (as a fair and equal treatment), right, Ulysses? Only what some can use as a discrimnatory claim as 'victimhood' over others to bias it with--but just not in Abigail Fisher's case.....Abigail Fisher has to 'get over it'....like any oppressor could say to anyone they have oppressed at any time in history (that doesn't approach, or treat, people fairly and equally--even as an entity of a government supposedly 'of, by, and for, the people')....Quote Ulysses:
Uh uh. Those adjectives came from the folks who gave me the sheepskins.
I don't think you received those sheepskins, Ulysses. At least not from a reputable institution. After all, I haven't seen any of your so-called 'education' on anything that you accuse others over--up to and including what distinctions you have with your 'accepted Bible' that you imply in claiming that the New International version is 'not acceptable'--of course, according to you without even an inkling of any reasonable qualifications like most educated people could do....other than some vague appeal to 'authority' in some post you made....isn't 'appealing to authority' a logical fallacy in arguments, Ulysses? I think that educated people would know that....Quote Ulysses:
....but, it's OK and 'reasonable' to personally attack me, right?
How should I know?
Because that is all you ever do, Ulysses--in every discussion I have seen you in. You personally attack. You go out of your, my, and any other aspect of the discussion's, way to personally attack. But, I know, the wise moniter of DRC has sanctioned your form of attack on me--and did so on the abortion thread. You know, DRC, who told me 'to go to hell' on the abortion thread. You all offer such lavish remarks about each other as you castigate any one that doesn't follow lock-step with you--just like any clan....accusing me for continuing the description of near birth fetal brain sucking and skull crushing when that was D_NATURED's description--proving that, like all clans, you will condone in your friend what you will condemn in your enemy.....
The Kumbaya clan....but, you're lying hypocrites if you don't think what 'the clan' offers and stands for doesn't have 'selfish causes and interests' involved--you just hide it in dishonest Kumbaya-clan talk....as you accuse me for 'being selfish' by claiming that I am a 'libertarian'.....even if it is a 'leftist libertarian' that considers the primary duty of a good government is to secure and guarantee individual rights--with, as Roe vs. Wade noted, the primary one of that being 'right to life' because without it, you would not have access to any other right...so, the whole distinction between the contention of rights that elective abortions are all about is when does the 'right to life' begin....most honest, conscientious, thoughtful citizens believe it to be sometime before birth--the most natural manner to consider this is that if the fetus can come out alive, it should come out alive, and, if it takes a 'special (separate) procedure' to kill it (such as D_NATURED's near birth fetal brain sucking and skull crushing), it could have come out alive....but, the Kumbaya clan doesn't want this to be about 'right to life', doesn't even want this to be about 'individual rights', claims they are all about 'community' (as long as no one in that 'community' expresses a concern over the near birth fetus), doesn't seem to acknowledge that a woman wanting to abort her child is a selfish interest, and, then, castigates me from the beginning of the abortion discussion on the abortion thread for being 'selfish' as a 'libertarian'....and, then, claims that 'I' have no logic in this discussion.....what hypocrites you are.....
Ah! I've placed the banderillas...