Daily, Africans Face Genocide.

On July 23, 2016, we discontinued our forums. We ask our members to please join us in our new community site, The Hartmann Report. Please note that you will have to register a new account on The Hartmann Report.

1 post / 0 new

Daily, Africans face genocide. Across the continent, mothers wake up each morning not knowing if their children will get fed that day or die from lack of nutrition. The death rate of children under five years old from malnutrition has worsened in the Sahel region of Africa.

Iran's Press TV reported on Oct. 12, that the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs had concluded, that in the Zinder region of Niger, out of 79,087 cases of acute severe malnutrition in children under five, 362 had died between January 1 and September 23, 2013.

In an Oct. 12 interview with Press TV, Lawrence Freeman, Director of the Africa Desk of Executive Intelligence Review, identified this as a conscious policy of genocide for Africa, as advocated by the British Royal Family. Freeman said, "If you look at the fact that through the decades and decades of global concern about poverty — we still have millions of people who have been dying from lack of food — this has been understood as a policy of genocide.

"The international global financial system itself, run by the City of London and Wall Street, they don't want Africans to live. They want to reduce the population. The genocide policy is continuing in Africa over these many decades.

"I know several projects that could be used, invested in, that could alleviate hunger. There's an absolute refusal to make that investment. We are making a decision to kill people rather than build infrastructure in water, energy, rail transportation and agriculture that could feed people."

When Freeman was asked to clarify if this was a systematic policy to get rid of Africans, he responded: "There are a group of — you might call them Malthusian extremists, or others who are more extreme, who believe that the world is overpopulated.

"You've had numerous statements from the royal family — Prince Phillip, Prince Charles, Elizabeth — the whole World Wildlife Fund, the environmentalist movement, the so-called Green Movement, is a movement to suppress progress, suppress technology, so that in effect their policy is, and they've stated it openly, they believe there's too many people in the world and there's too few resources.

"Now, this is a fraudulent argument, because the creativity of man and science overcomes the so-called limitations. But this is their belief and they would like to see the world population reduced to 1 billion people.

"You're going to see for Africa, they would like to see a very small group of people in Africa, where they can control the resources with a limited number of Africans on the ground. It maybe shocking, but is true."

Karolina's picture
Nov. 3, 2011 6:45 pm

Impeachment: The Difference Between Nixon & Trump

Thom plus logo There is a very simple reason why some Republicans participated in the impeachment proceedings against Richard Nixon, but none have so far broken ranks against Trump. That reason is the US Supreme Court.
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system