Our doublespeaking president must have a very short memory. In 2004 he co sponsored SB 2386 a law strengthening Illinois Stand Your Ground law.

I guess if obama were a city, he would look like Detroit.



bmolloy124's picture
bmolloy124 6 years 16 weeks ago

"Our doublespeaking president must have a short memory. In 2004 he co sponsored SB 2386 a law strengthening Illinois Stand Your Ground law."

I guess if obama were a city, he would look like Detroit."

This comment coming so close after mine only furthers my fears of ignorance 'out there' in the blogosphere. I have no idea what the writer means to promote: Is it, Obama has always been for "Stand Your Ground?" But, only in the aftermath of killing of Trayvon Martin, Obama "up and changed his mind?"......... If so, Good for Obama!!! Well done if the Pres. changed his mind after death of innocent skittles carrying kid!

On the other hand, what's up with this comment(er)? He/She means to say that killing of Trayvon Martin is well and good and even one time "sanctioned" by the President?

Love how Detroit is capitalized while "obama" is not (!).. But that's beside the point...

Luis_L.'s picture
Luis_L. 6 years 16 weeks ago

I guess when a country reserves the right to strike first you can interpret that to mean stand your ground.

Rodger97321's picture
Rodger97321 5 years 39 weeks ago

Another case of an article written for its choir that no one got around to pointing out the problems (I am no fan of whOreBama, but we need our criticisms to have a valid basis.)

Here's the part of the pre-existing law that was left intact:

(720 ILCS 5/7-4) (from Ch. 38, par. 7-4)
Sec. 7-4. Use of force by aggressor.
The justification described in the preceding Sections of this Article is not available to a person who:
(a) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or
(b) Initially provokes the use of force against himself, with the intent to use such force as an excuse to inflict bodily harm upon the assailant; or
(c) Otherwise initially provokes the use of force against himself, unless:
(1) Such force is so great that he reasonably believes that he is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm, and that he has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or
(2) In good faith, he withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.
(Source: Laws 1961, p. 1983.)

It may be instructive to note that the section which immediately precedes Illinois' 1961 version of "Stand your ground only as a last resort" is the one that details the law in regard to "mental disease or mental defect".

For me this makes sense bedause my reaction to hearing about the rash of new "Stand Your Ground" laws was that they were designed to decriminalize acts by people with a (largely media created/sponsored)mental defect.

Anyway, there's a long list of things POTUS has done that he will never be able to correct or make amends for - this just doesn't happen to be one of them.

Add comment

Login or register to post comments

Come Cruise with Thom Hartmann in July 2020

Join me for an exciting Bermuda getaway aboard Oceania Cruises, the world’s leading culinary and destination-focused cruise line. Set sail on the reimagined Insignia for 7 nights beginning July 25th 2020. Take advantage of Oceania Cruises’ OLife Choice promotion, where you can choose shore excursions, a beverage package, or onboard credit – Oceania Cruises also includes Wifi! You'll also receive complimentary gratuities, a $50 onboard credit and two exclusive cocktail parties. Did I mention we are planning special onboard events with yours truly? Prices start at $1199.

Reserve your stateroom today by contacting Keene Luxury Travel, and mention the Thom Hartmann Group 800.856.1155

or go to https://www.keeneluxurytravel.com/th-bermuda/default.asp

Impeachment: The Difference Between Nixon & Trump

Thom plus logo There is a very simple reason why some Republicans participated in the impeachment proceedings against Richard Nixon, but none have so far broken ranks against Trump. That reason is the US Supreme Court.