Properties owned by non-profits are exempt from paying property taxes for much of their real estate. This results in a shifting of the tax burden to the rest of us. According to the Washington State Department of Revenue there are approximately 5,000 churches from over 120 religious denominations in Washington. The tax shift is approximately $70 million in revenue that must be picked up by the rest of us property owners.

I do not mind certain organizations such as homeless shelters and hospitals getting a break on their property taxes because such organizations do work that would otherwise fall to government. But I abhor subsidizing the temple to another man’s god.

I do recognize that many churches house and feed the homeless, but that is only part of their function. The primary function of churches is and always has been proselytizing and perpetuating their beliefs. Property tax exemptions should be apportioned to churches based on services they provide society. On the federal level, the IRS requires a form 990 which is required of all non-profits except churches. If churches were required to complete the 990, along with transparency, there would be information that could be useful to apportion taxes.

The exemption for church property is also a clear violation of the establishment clause of the 2nd amendment. Associate Justice of the US Supreme court, William O. Douglas, in his dissenting opinion in Walz v. Tax Commission of the City of New York, decided May 4, 1970, stated: "If believers are entitled to public financial support, so are nonbelievers. A believer and nonbeliever under the present law are treated differently because of the articles of their faith… I conclude that this tax exemption is unconstitutional."

In addition to supporting ideas and beliefs of others, we are supporting extravagant life styles for some pastors of large congregations, especially the mega churches and the televangelists. The average annual salary for pastors with congregations of 2,000 or more is $147,000 and some earning up to $400,000. Many of these ministers own multi million dollar mansions such as Creflo and Taffi Dollar of World Changers Church who own several mansions in Georgia and a $2.5 million Manhattan apartment.

Others can believe in any fiction they want and build monuments and temples to any god they wish, but please do not make me pick up the burden of their taxes.

Comments

Robindell's picture
Robindell 4 years 13 weeks ago
#1

Not going to happen. Or in the words of George H.W. Bush as imitated by Dana Carvey, "Not going to do it."

Falkenbird's picture
Falkenbird 4 years 13 weeks ago
#2

You are probably correct; "not going to happen". But Just as Hobby Lobby, some members of SCOTUS, and the rest of the christian block keep chipping away at the wall that separates Church/State, rational people need to keep repairing and attempting to rebuild it.

We can't just sit by and watch as some in power attempt to turn us into a theocracy.

Palindromedary's picture
Palindromedary 4 years 13 weeks ago
#3

Falkenbird: I totally agree with you! Tax the churches!!
I wonder if the church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster gets a tax break for being a religious organization. What about the Church of Satan? I wonder if we could get away with the Church of Atheism?

Robindell's picture
Robindell 4 years 13 weeks ago
#4

People who are politically unrealistic are in essence acting just as religious people are in dealing in the realm of illusions. People who act as if they can simply make a statement declaring something they want done, which many others would not agree with, are taking up other people's precious time. There are so many other important political and economic issues that are more pressing and where some action is at least somewhat in the realm of future possibility that I have to believe that one of the reasons progressives and Democratics often don't accomplish a great deal is that their supporters waste time with idealistic, unrealistic arguments without assessing the viability of these things ever coming about through the legislative process. You have to first build coalitions before certain things can even be seriously talked about. Talking about desired changes just for the fun of it, when their are other priorities that might have at least a snowball's chance in hell of being taken up someday, just is not a productive use of one's time and energy.

Alfonso O. Saldaña's picture
Alfonso O. Saldaña 26 weeks 5 days ago
#5

I agree with the post in general; I only want to point out that the establishment clause the author refers to is in the 1st amendment, not in the 2nd.

Add comment

Login or register to post comments

The Thom Hartmann Program - Aug 30th 2018

It seems it's all racism, all the time w/the GOP...Neo-Nazi robocall hits Iowa on Molly Tibbett’s murder: “KILL THEM ALL. ” Richard Wolff drops by about the National Debt. Is it a disaster or an OK thing? Also - Trump & The National Enquirer - Is the Economy Here To Serve Us Or Are We Here to Serve the economy?