(Part 1 is here.)

Here’s how it works. Each district would be represented by 5 votes in the legislature (or possibly more, but fewer isn’t a good idea), each obviously worth 20% of the popular vote. If an election with two candidates goes roughly 60-40, the candidate with about 60% gets 3 of the votes in the legislature, and the other candidate gets 2. If it’s roughly 80-20, the result is 4-1. With more candidates, the math gets more complicated, and the fair way to determine how many votes each candidate gets is the Hare-Niemeyer method, which some countries use for their proportional representation systems. I know the idea of individuals with different amounts of power can seem unfair, but remember that the legislators are not there to represent themselves but their constituents, and someone with more constituents should have more power. It’s like owners of stock in a corporation having different numbers of votes at a shareholders’ meeting—those that have invested more get more say in how the investment is used.

The legislature would not be able to hold votes by acclamation, but this is not much of a concern, since votes can be taken in other ways. Electronic voting (which the U.S. House of Representatives already has) will, however, make it easy to cope with the varying numbers of votes held by legislators, each of whom should be required to cast all of his votes the same. So a legislator’s response to a question would still be “aye” or “nay”, but that response would be multiplied by the number of votes he holds, rather than, say, letting a legislator with 3 votes respond with “one aye, one nay and one abstention.”

Because a candidate would need at minimum only about 10% to get a vote in the legislature (due to rounding), this system begs for term limits. But rather than set an absolute limit, it can be designed to be based on how many votes the legislator holds. With 5 votes per district and 2-year terms, the formula I’d recommend is this: A candidate becomes ineligible for re-election if his terms exceed twice his current votes. So someone that never gets more than 1 vote could serve a maximum of 3 terms, 2 votes 5 terms, 3 votes 7 terms, 4 votes (rare) 9 terms, and 5 votes (unlikely) 11 terms. I would also include only the terms consecutive with the current term being served, so that legislators could serve for a while, go back to normal life, then serve again.

The really difficult aspect to deal with is how to replace a legislator in the middle of a term. In Colorado, where I live, if a member of the General Assembly leaves office early, the district committee of the same party chooses someone; there is no public election. That would be a viable system, unless the ex-legislator ran without party backing. The U.S. Constitution requires a popular election for representatives, even in special elections, so in that case, there are three options: 1) having what is essentially a primary vote within the party whose representative left office, with all the legislature votes going to the winner, 2) having an partially open election, but only among those voters affiliated with parties that don’t still have members serving that district, with multiple legislature votes being allocated to the representatives in the same manner as in the general election, and 3) having a fully open election with the legislature votes being distributed as in a general election. Number 2 seems the best, since in number 3 people that already got a representative could get another, and number 1 is pretty much undemocratic, and can’t deal with the case of an unaffiliated legislator. This would be up to the states for the most part, but Congress is allowed to override state laws concerning the time, manner and place of choosing members of Congress.

Catablog

Comments

mathboy's picture
mathboy 7 years 21 weeks ago
#1

Dedicated to charell, who inadvertently reminded me to finally post this.

Add comment

Login or register to post comments

Come Cruise with Thom Hartmann in July 2020

Join me for an exciting Bermuda getaway aboard Oceania Cruises, the world’s leading culinary and destination-focused cruise line. Set sail on the reimagined Insignia for 7 nights beginning July 25th 2020. Take advantage of Oceania Cruises’ OLife Choice promotion, where you can choose shore excursions, a beverage package, or onboard credit – Oceania Cruises also includes Wifi! You'll also receive complimentary gratuities, a $50 onboard credit and two exclusive cocktail parties. Did I mention we are planning special onboard events with yours truly? Prices start at $1199.

Reserve your stateroom today by contacting Keene Luxury Travel, and mention the Thom Hartmann Group 800.856.1155

or go to https://www.keeneluxurytravel.com/th-bermuda/default.asp

Why Hasn't Congress Taken War Powers Away From Trump?

Thom plus logo Donald Trump's pathetic betrayal of our Kurdish allies in northern Syria highlights the importance of Congress taking seriously it's constitutional obligation to define and authorize war.