Your support of the program is invaluable. Producing the Thom Hartmann Program is a labor of love for the team, but doesn't come without cost. We supply the program to non-profit, community and volunteer radio and cable stations across the US. However, this isn't cost-free and being a supporter through Patreon means you can help us to meet some of the bills, to allow us to continue free supply to the non-profit sector.

As a way of saying thank you, we would like to give you something back for your support at various levels. Every weekday, the live Thom Hartmann Program three hour program is recorded exclusively for Patreon supporters. Unedited, the full three-hour video will be right here on the Patreon page, within a couple of hours of the end of the live program. And we're also providing extra videos exclusive to sponsors.
Sponsor Special: How to Stop Your Food From Killing You. The American diet is now killing more people than high blood pressure and smoking

Become a Thom Supporter- Click the Patreon button

holding czars accountable?

The ruling by the appeals court shouldn't be read as political since it is based on the Constitution as the judges see it. But it does have political ramifacations/aspects.

Only when you have a liberal majority could it be possible to go forward with something like the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. ​Even then, political wrangling, dealmaking, etc. will lessen the ability of the agency to do whatever it would do without political constraint.

There are good arguments out there for not letting bureaucracies become the courts. But the courts cannot do what the bureaucracies do; and, in fact, the relationship between the courts and bureaucracy is one where neither operates independently from the other. The bureaucracies may interpret the law to some extent, but they are still subject to legal action. The courts rely on the evidence and reasoning gathered by the bureacracies as part of the considerations in any ruling.

The outcome of the 2016 elections in respect to not only the presidency but control of the houses of Congress will determine the fate of the CFPB. If under a Republican president no doubt the demise of the bureau will be effectuated somehow.​ But whatever happens, giving the President power to fire the head of the CFPB would mean that the actions of the agency are subject to political considerations. The point of independence of the agency is that it avoids these kinds of political difficulties and can look at things objectively.

By Kate Gibson MoneyWatch October 11, 2016, 11:56 AM
Court: structure of consumer watchdog agency unconstitutional
Last Updated Oct 11, 2016 3:36 PM EDT

The bureau is funded through the Federal Reserve, a process intended to allow it to operation without concern about politics. That independence has been an area of contention, most particularly for Republicans. The House Financial Services Committee in 2013 took issue with the lack of congressional oversight on the CFPB’s budget. The panel in April approved proposals to give Congress authority over the bureau’s budget.

Sign Up For The Thom Hartmann Newsletter Now

  • Discover the Videos of the Day
  • Get The Daily Stack - Each & Every Article that Is Researched for the Program
  • Read Thom's Daily Blog

So you want to start a progressive podcast? These 10 tips will help you be successful

Thom plus logo
Here are a few tips to the up-and-coming crop of progressive podcasters from somebody who's been doing it for around 15 years.