Once again we have a perfect example of a direct lie and everyone sourcing it.
The title " blow-gaping-hole in global warming....." should tip everyone off. I read the paper and while the data may have been collected at some point by NASA, the source is WCRP CMIP. NO mention of NASA. These guys are from the U of Alabama and their funding from the DOE and NOAA. They never said, "gaping hole" or any of this. Maybe you could get Dr. Roy Spencer on the show.
This is the published paper. Read it and see if you would have written the Forbes article. I mean without being one of the asses from the Heartland Institution that claims the free market will fix environmental issues. The paper is pretty easy reading and you will find they only mention climate models are complex and need adjusting.
Here is the real stuff
Thanks for a great show.
Several sources spreading the lies.