The connections between Goldman Sachs and both Cruz (through Heidi) and Drumpf (through numerous business dealings) leads to the inevitable conclusion that either of these two candidates may have access to Hillary's transcripts of the speeches or, possibly worse, covert video of one or multiple of the more recent speeches. Does anyone remember the covert "47% video" of Mittens?
I can think of any number of statements that Hillary could have made in those speeches that, taken out of context or not, could be devastating to the November election for Democrats. One example: Suppose Clinton elaborates to the Goldman Sachs execs what she means (to Wall Street) by her statement of there being a difference between running for President and being President.
This seems like a potentially serious liability to me.