We've got a deadbeat billionaire problem in America. We keep giving billions in tax breaks to billionaires and meg-millionaires with the expectation they will "create jobs" with their massive personal fortunes. But they haven't followed through with their end of the deal. No jobs are being created! What? How can this be? The Republican's Vast Right Wing Echo Chamber continuously proclaims as Gospel that the super rich need special tax treatment because they are the only ones who create jobs.

I see the one way to get to the bottom of this perplexing enigma is for the Senate to subpoena every billionaire and mega-millionaire to Washington to testify under oath, before congress, with cameras running, and transcripts recording. And demand that each of them tell us exactly HOW MANY jobs they've created with their PERSONAL FORTUNES for each year they were among the super rich.

We will then know with clarity and precision the concrete past results of the Republican's bedrock mantra-policies of, "low taxes on the rich creates jobs", "tax cuts on the rich will create jobs", and "avoiding job killing tax increases on the rich..." I'd wager to conclude they are all falsehoods upon which no policy can ever be based: If an insufficient number of jobs have been created by relying on deadbeat billionaires and mega-millionaires, then restore the higher tax rates of the 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s and 70s to bring down our nation's debt, fund rebuilding of our nation's infrastructure, secure our safety net programs of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, and put the money back into the economy where proven demand driven forces will create jobs.

And higher tax rates will finally give the top earners an incentive to become more productive. Attaining their personal financial goals will either take a little longer - like it used to, or they'll decide to do as the super rich once did - to figure out how to produce more to increase their income.

They will need to hire more people to produce more to meet the demands from the demand-driven economy, they'll have to work harder and smarter to accelerate their new product development, they'll invest their company's revenue towards expansion and growth instead of pocketing it as they now do, and figure out how to become more efficient.

Okay Senators: the time for you to do this is now.

...(from my piece as recommended by readers in Nicholas Kristof's recent NY Times column) - William.


Calperson's picture
Calperson 8 years 25 weeks ago

If you multiplied the McCarthy trials and the Salem witch trials together you will still not come anywhere near to reaching the level of Facism described above :(

RepubliCult's picture
RepubliCult 8 years 23 weeks ago

Well Bubba, no witch hunt was needed to find believers in Voo Doo economics, they're self admitted zealots of that disproven craft, all rolled up into the republican party. But most people rather know WTF the taxpayer is getting for their tax dollars, hence the need for testimony from the beneficiaries of your brand of tax and give to billionaires.

Don't be so afraid of Americas consitution, its checks and balances, such as testifying under oath. Unless you are of like minded company with the Slacker in Chief Bush and his VP Cheney - such as they were in refusing to testify under oath about their deeds before 9-11. No facts needed, they just went on with policy and spend $5 trillion more of red ink. Tragically, you are content to do so too, refusing to see the insanity of repeating the same Bush faith-based voo doo economic policies that failed to produce jobs.

Nothing works as well to get at the truth as having those who are holier-than-thou to swear on the Bible to testify, under oath, on camera, with a transcript to the American people. It's precisly why America needs to hear from the mega-rich on eactly how many freaking stinking jobs they are creating with all the money you plan to keep stuffing into their pockets.

wmstoll's picture
wmstoll 8 years 23 weeks ago

The only thing increased demand is proven to do is increase prices. There is no rule that says supply will automatically increase domestic manufacture, infact I would suggest that in a global market it would be in the best interest of the manufacturers to import to satisfy demand.

wmstoll's picture
wmstoll 8 years 23 weeks ago

I quit smoking because I couldn't afford the taxes, now I'm to believe that higher taxes give you more productivity from those taxed. I don't know.

wmstoll's picture
wmstoll 8 years 22 weeks ago

Why do we always assume that increased demand will result in increased domestic supply. It could just as easily be satisfied with imports.

Add comment

Login or register to post comments

Come Cruise with Thom Hartmann in July 2020

Join me for an exciting Bermuda getaway aboard Oceania Cruises, the world’s leading culinary and destination-focused cruise line. Set sail on the reimagined Insignia for 7 nights beginning July 25th 2020. Take advantage of Oceania Cruises’ OLife Choice promotion, where you can choose shore excursions, a beverage package, or onboard credit – Oceania Cruises also includes Wifi! You'll also receive complimentary gratuities, a $50 onboard credit and two exclusive cocktail parties. Did I mention we are planning special onboard events with yours truly? Prices start at $1199.

Reserve your stateroom today by contacting Keene Luxury Travel, and mention the Thom Hartmann Group 800.856.1155

or go to https://www.keeneluxurytravel.com/th-bermuda/default.asp

Would a Democratic President Wield Power as Ruthlessly as Trump?

Thom plus logo Interestingly, the current divide in the Senate gives us an insight into how powerful a genuinely progressive Democratic president could be, and how much he or she could get done. As we saw yesterday, the Republicans voted repeatedly to participate in a cover-up of Donald Trump's crimes.