YES! It's good to know what we're up against.
52%
NO! They'll be telling the same lies they always do.
48%

Comments

LeMoyne's picture
LeMoyne 13 years 25 weeks ago

The CPAC radio row shows can be truly awesome.

To hear a conservative Catholic identify basic social principles, common to ~all societies that are missing in our current politics (early Christian societies were communes, some religious communities still are today). Certainly Thom is right: Jesus and the disciples were communists.

To hear a discussion of natural rights - there is a greater commonality between left, right and independent that is overridden and suppressed by the fakey corporate duopoly. There is always some pure bliss for me when Thom can agree with the guests in these situations.

To hear a relaxed discussion Dan Bongigno so he doesn't seem like just some hyper-caffeinated libertarian argument machine. Thom and he agree frequently - very pleasant to see a review.

I think there is a flaw in Libertarianism with regard to public roads that points to a common basic misunderstanding about the Constitution. The USConstitution is described as a bill of negative rights. The full realm of human rights is open and NOT addressed by the Constitution except in the Ninth Amendment. The loss of respect for and understanding of the Ninth has people believing that they have Constitutionally guaranteed rights, instead of inherent and natural human rights.

If the Constitution addresses our natural and inherent human right to breathe it is in the Ninth.
Remember the Ninth!
Anything not covered by the rest of the Constitution remains with the people.
If we are a free people, then we have a right to freely travel from point A to point B
-- [home, work, school, stores, parks, libraries, etc.]
without trespassing or climbing fences.
Public roads are the way that a popular government enables the right of free passage.
Without public roads, the natural right to travel will inexorably come into conflict with the right of private property.
Libertarianism too often misses our many implied and expansive rights in favor of the rights of property and weaponry. In fact all of the major political formations share this failing. The modern world and especially the US are missing the radical analysis of a progressive left that has been successfully espoused from Christ through Chavez...

We have the right and responsibility, we have both the power and the duty to learn to share this world in a sustainable way that improves the world, our environment and our communities. To promote the general welfare is to positively affect the lives of everyone and that purpose of government is more central, more basic and organic than to provide for the common defense: common defense is just a part of the general welfare.

Enabling, expanding and enhancing our natural human rights is an inherent part of providing for the general welfare. Public roads make the right of free travel possible, and it is the right of free travel that makes the right of assembly possible. Far too many Americans are willing to give all of this all up for nothing except the dubious right to return to passive, obedient, trapped-in-place serfdom.

Remember the Ninth!

Anything not covered by the rest of the Constitution remains with the people.

2950-10K's picture
2950-10K 13 years 25 weeks ago

In the hands of the government. The Libertarians hate this idea. So if not in the hands of the government, in the hands of "WHO," and why should we trust "WHO" more than DEMOCRACY? Too often "WHO" turns out to be guys like David Koch. Does anybody really think guys like him are a better choice than elected representatives for carrying out the will of the people?

humanitys team's picture
humanitys team 13 years 24 weeks ago

Interesting comment about what Thom said about Jesus and the disciples ,it kind of echo,s a quote from one of my favourite spiritual books ."until humanity learns to live in community ,we will never experience what the divine is"

samsnead 13 years 24 weeks ago

I read what the junior senator from PA, Pat Toomey, was blathering about at CPAP yesterday. Still monday morning quarterbacking over why "they" lost last November. I will be delighted to pull the lever against Tea Party Toomey, one of the Koch brothers mouthpieces and also one of their whores, in 2016. In the meantime why don't you have him on the show Thom? You could ask him why, as a fiscal stingymeister who is a multi-millionaire, is he sucking salary and benefits from the teat of the taxpayers and not paying his own way, and has the nerve to infer that the "47%" are shiftless freeloaders. JFK donated his salary to chairity. A JFK Tea Party Toomey is NOT!!!

Thom's Blog Is On the Move

Hello All

Thom's blog in this space and moving to a new home.

Please follow us across to hartmannreport.com - this will be the only place going forward to read Thom's blog posts and articles.

From Unequal Protection, 2nd Edition:
"If you wonder why and when giant corporations got the power to reign supreme over us, here’s the story."
Jim Hightower, national radio commentator and author of Swim Against the Current
From The Thom Hartmann Reader:
"In an age rife with media-inspired confusion and political cowardice, we yearn for a decent, caring, deeply human soul whose grasp of the problems confronting us provides a light by which we can make our way through the quagmire of lies, distortions, pandering, and hollow self-puffery that strips the American Dream of its promise. How lucky we are, then, to have access to the wit, wisdom, and willingness of Thom Hartmann, who shares with us here that very light, grown out of his own life experience."
Mike Farrell, actor, political activist, and author of Just Call Me Mike and Of Mule and Man
From The Thom Hartmann Reader:
"Thom Hartmann is a creative thinker and committed small-d democrat. He has dealt with a wide range of topics throughout his life, and this book provides an excellent cross section. The Thom Hartmann Reader will make people both angry and motivated to act."
Dean Baker, economist and author of Plunder and Blunder, False Profits, and Taking Economics Seriously