YES! It's a clear violation of the Constitution.
23%
YES! But even a broken clock is right twice a day.
77%
Comments
Thom's Blog Is On the Move
By webmaster
Hello All
Thom's blog in this space and moving to a new home.
Please follow us across to hartmannreport.com - this will be the only place going forward to read Thom's blog posts and articles.
Images of Thom
Thom & Louise at a "private audience" with His Holiness Pope John Paul II at his summer palace, Castle Gandolfo, Italy
From Cracking the Code:
"In Cracking the Code, Thom Hartmann, America’s most popular, informed, and articulate progressive talk show host and political analyst, tells us what makes humans vulnerable to unscrupulous propagandists and what we can do about it. It is essential reading for all Americans who are fed up with right-wing extremists manipulating our minds and politics to promote agendas contrary to our core values and interests."
From Unequal Protection, 2nd Edition:
"Hartmann combines a remarkable piece of historical research with a brilliant literary style to tell the grand story of corporate corruption and its consequences for society with the force and readability of a great novel."
From The Thom Hartmann Reader:
"Thom Hartmann is a creative thinker and committed small-d democrat. He has dealt with a wide range of topics throughout his life, and this book provides an excellent cross section. The Thom Hartmann Reader will make people both angry and motivated to act."
Rand Paul was just playing to his base.
Is there a difference between the FBI ordering a seige on an armed encapement risking Law Enforcement officers and ordering a drone attack?
Preemptive attacks are wrong in the US or outside of the US. This administration has not done it yet, but the last administration did, and we can only hope the next one will not.
On the surface, absolutely justified. My hatred of drones is no secret. But considering the source, I'm skeptical of his motive. I agree with "agebel" that he was pandering to his base. This afternoon Randy Rhodes pointed out that Rand Paul was the ultimate recipient of money left over from his father's presidential campaign, much of which was contributed by liberals because of Ron Paul's anti-war position. So Rand Paul just might also be pandering to liberals in an effort to attract more contributions from gullible liberals. Frankly, I wouldn't trust the guy as far as I could throw him. - Aliceinwonderland