YES! It's a better use of drones than bombing civilians.
17%
NO! It’s creepy, potentially dangerous and unnecessary.
83%
Comments
Thom's Blog Is On the Move
By webmaster
Hello All
Thom's blog in this space and moving to a new home.
Please follow us across to hartmannreport.com - this will be the only place going forward to read Thom's blog posts and articles.
Images of Thom
From The Thom Hartmann Reader:
"Thom Hartmann is a creative thinker and committed small-d democrat. He has dealt with a wide range of topics throughout his life, and this book provides an excellent cross section. The Thom Hartmann Reader will make people both angry and motivated to act."
From Unequal Protection, 2nd Edition:
"Hartmann combines a remarkable piece of historical research with a brilliant literary style to tell the grand story of corporate corruption and its consequences for society with the force and readability of a great novel."
From Screwed:
"Hartmann speaks with the straight talking clarity and brilliance of a modern day Tom Paine as he exposes the intentional and systematic destruction of America’s middle class by an alliance of political con artists and outlines a program to restore it. This is Hartmann at his best. Essential reading for those interested in restoring the institution that made America the envy of the world."
Another target for urban "warriors" to shoot at & how could they control the thing more than a block or two? The range of most remote control helicopters is very short & where would & how would they land at their destination? Are they only going to be programed to land at certain landing places then the "consumer" would then have to get to the landing place to retreive their item. Clearly, it won't work where I live, in a small rural town.
Sounds about as nuts as a air "powered" car.
just use air tubes, like Woolworths in the 1950's.The drones are terroism to the rest of the world!! EVIL, is as evil does!