The Republican justice's disgust me. They don't care about you or me just lining their pockets with more riches and to hell with America the free..................
The Justices are supposed to rule on constitutional matters not on their personal religious beliefs and former political associations. In my view, I do not see that the ultra-conservative justices have shed their former political associations nor do they recuse themselves in cases where they have had a past association or expounded their views publicly. Corruption comes in many forms.
I agree with JessieV. The question becomes how does one rein in the power of the Supreme Court within the framewwork of the Constitution. At this point, we not only have a judicial branch that's trying to rule, but a legislative bramch that's clearly tending in that direction. Indeed, the concept of balance of powers is being stretched to its limits.
The not-so-Supreme Court has been in needing of being reeled in for years. But, it's hard to get Congress to do what itself needs to do, as does the Presidency. Perhaps the elites who actually own and control the government can be conviniced that it would be in their best interest? At least then we'd have a fighting chance.
Mueller's favorite place to pray (written about in "Prophet's Way"), and the roof of the room where the Last Supper is reputed to have happened.
From The Thom Hartmann Reader:
"Thom Hartmann is a literary descendent of Ben Franklin and Tom Paine. His unflinching observations and deep passion inspire us to explore contemporary culture, politics, and economics; challenge us to face the facts of the societies we are creating; and empower us to demand a better world for our children and grandchildren."
—John Perkins, author of the New York Times bestselling book Confessions of an Economic Hit Man
From Unequal Protection, 2nd Edition:
"If you wonder why and when giant corporations got the power to reign supreme over us, here’s the story."
—Jim Hightower, national radio commentator and author of Swim Against the Current
From The Thom Hartmann Reader:
"Right through the worst of the Bush years and into the present, Thom Hartmann has been one of the very few voices constantly willing to tell the truth. Rank him up there with Jon Stewart, Bill Moyers, and Paul Krugman for having the sheer persistent courage of his convictions."
The Republican justice's disgust me. They don't care about you or me just lining their pockets with more riches and to hell with America the free..................
The Justices are supposed to rule on constitutional matters not on their personal religious beliefs and former political associations. In my view, I do not see that the ultra-conservative justices have shed their former political associations nor do they recuse themselves in cases where they have had a past association or expounded their views publicly. Corruption comes in many forms.
I agree with JessieV. The question becomes how does one rein in the power of the Supreme Court within the framewwork of the Constitution. At this point, we not only have a judicial branch that's trying to rule, but a legislative bramch that's clearly tending in that direction. Indeed, the concept of balance of powers is being stretched to its limits.
The not-so-Supreme Court has been in needing of being reeled in for years. But, it's hard to get Congress to do what itself needs to do, as does the Presidency. Perhaps the elites who actually own and control the government can be conviniced that it would be in their best interest? At least then we'd have a fighting chance.