YES! Everything must be on the table to help the economy.
0%
NO! Any deal that cuts social programs is not balanced.
100%
Asked on Nov. 14, 2012 11:24 am
Comments
Thom's Blog Is On the Move

By webmaster
Thom's blog in this space and moving to a new home.
Please follow us across to hartmannreport.com - this will be the only place going forward to read Thom's blog posts and articles.
Images of Thom
From Screwed:
"Hartmann speaks with the straight talking clarity and brilliance of a modern day Tom Paine as he exposes the intentional and systematic destruction of America’s middle class by an alliance of political con artists and outlines a program to restore it. This is Hartmann at his best. Essential reading for those interested in restoring the institution that made America the envy of the world."
—David C. Korten, author of The Great Turning and When Corporations Rule the World
From Cracking the Code:
"No one communicates more thoughtfully or effectively on the radio airwaves than Thom Hartmann. He gets inside the arguments and helps people to think them through—to understand how to respond when they’re talking about public issues with coworkers, neighbors, and friends. This book explores some of the key perspectives behind his approach, teaching us not just how to find the facts, but to talk about what they mean in a way that people will hear."
—Paul Loeb, author of Soul of a Citizen
From The Thom Hartmann Reader:
"Thom Hartmann channels the best of the American Founders with voice and pen. His deep attachment to a democratic civil society is just the medicine America needs."
—Tom Hayden, author of The Long Sixties and director, Peace and Justice Resource Center.
The Hartmann Report
Thom's Daily Newsletter of Renaissance Thinking about Progressive Politics, Economics, Science, and the Political News Issues of Our Day.
© 2026 Mythical Intelligence, inc.
Drupal site designed and developed by HollyIT
Drupal site designed and developed by HollyIT


Raising the income cap for FISA deductions would secure Social Security, according to Sen. Bernie Sanders, and is a common sense approach to serving public needs well beyond the baby boomers.
As Reagan pointed out in 1984, "Social Security has nothing to do with the deficit."
President Clinton used the Social Security funds to pay off the National debt with an IOU to us the fund payers. Now the Republicans want to take away our social security by portraying social security as an entitlement. Social Security is not an entitlement but money we put into it to be paid back to us. However, Clinton used our money to pay off the debt now the Republicans want to reneg on the deal to pay us back. What a country and a bunch of liars to boot. Tax the Rich!!!!!!!!!!
Balanced? Medicare and social security are the least we can do for working people who pay for it out of their meager earnings! If you want to talk about medicare for all and raising social security that would be a big step towards "balanced"! Maybe when average earnings jump even by half of what they have for CEO's in the last ten years we can start to approach "balanced?! But not untill the banksters, warmongers, billionaires and hundred millionaires have paid down the deficit they created. Balanced? As long as there is a single hungry child, how about a 95% tax rate on earnings above $10 million? That would encourage investment. And now that wealthy people have extracted the majority of the wealth from we the people can we please tax capital gains at a rate at least as high as we tax people who actually work for a living?
The only change that should be made to Social Security is eliminating the earnings cap. That would ensure the program's solvency in perpetuity.