YES! It's time to undo the damage of gerrymandering!
66% (31 votes)
YES! If they don't stop them now, they'll steal the Presidency next!
34% (16 votes)
Total votes: 47

Comments

telliottmbamsc's picture
telliottmbamsc 1 year 40 weeks ago

50/50 ?!?! What kind of drugs are you People on!!!!

Of course they should be prosecuted!!! There should be HELL TO PAY! for even the slightest hint of subverting the best interest of the public!

oilartist's picture
oilartist 1 year 40 weeks ago

They are incorrigable in their determination to destroy our democracy. We must stop them in all of their efforts before people take to the streets. Or maybe I should say barricades.

Uncle Jimbo's picture
Uncle Jimbo 1 year 40 weeks ago

YES ! Absolutly . What should make them think they are above the law. Now lets see what the FEC or DOJ does - My guess is a spinless - nothing.

Uncle Jimbo's picture
Uncle Jimbo 1 year 40 weeks ago

oilartist - Thats what it may take - taking to the streets like in the 60's - But now a days the media will try and make us out to be rable rousers & trouble makers. If the FEC & DOJ does nothing - I say bring it on - time to take it to the streets. OCCUPY ! The future of our children is at stake now.

rruppena's picture
rruppena 1 year 40 weeks ago

Yes,o f course they should be prosecuted as should Alan Greenspa&, the people who dreamt up "derivatives" and NIST who avoided a real analysis of the evidence of WTC steel. NIST's 3-year $20,000,000 cover-up of the crime must be outed and someone is responsible for the termite and explosives at the WTC site and they must be prosecuted.

Anklejive.com's picture
Anklejive.com 1 year 40 weeks ago

The FEC has done nothing about any of the voter suppression leading up to the 2012 elections. Why should they change now?

addcoachglen's picture
addcoachglen 1 year 40 weeks ago

Scared people are dangerous people and as history has proven many times, a few committed (paranoid authoritarion) people can take over a democratic process with hidden agendas and hiding their true odious strategies. When ratios of 56/12 (house seats) are had in Ohio where the actual vote was very close (52% Republican 48% Democrat: if my memory of statistics is right on), something is wrong. But if you ask these constitution toting compulsivly patriotic people if they believe in the concept of one man one vote then in a republic apportion the representatives accordingly most would say absolutly. But when you ask them if that would result in a democratic control of the presidency and both houses of congress they will have all sorts of excuses why their various voter rigging schemes are justified (voter suppression, gerrymandering, court-stacking, ballot manipulation, polling days/hours).

Since I've seen the results of this over six or seven states where there was such a lopsided difference between the democratic vote percentage and the representation democrats recevied, I've wondered why there has been no class action challenging this loss of voter rights by the majority demanding a more equitable way to distrubute the congressional districts. That would bring more moderate candidates into races because no longer could they appeal only to the most extreme of their party but it would also create a space for doing the business of government in a system like ours which depends on compromise. But system rigging has now created a monster which cannot compromise nor act on the wishes of the people they represent but instead represent the wishes of the corporate special interests who pay for their (permanent) elections.

Uncle Draggi's picture
Uncle Draggi 1 year 40 weeks ago

Both 'options' are "Yes"? So much for "choice"... LOL

Actually, the =only= choice correctly should be "Yes", which only leaves the discussion up to 'will they or won't they'. And this is where it gets decidedly "sticky". OTOH, there'll be folks who want it done, but not really, because it will further aggravate the already-serious division of the population/opinion/whatever in this country, for no real effect. OTOH, there'll be some folks who will just shrug it off as nothing more than "politics as usual" .. as if that actually excuses something.

Personally, I think the GOP should be prosecuted "to the HILT" [N.B.Forrest], but doubt there are a pair of .. 'gonads' .. to be found in the entirety of Washington. Yes, the GOP has gotten to the point in their unmitigated hubris that they openly =brag= about how they are "legally" subverting the government (and plundering and destroying the country). ["Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was 'legal'." - MLK] Yes, they should be openly/publicly and effectively brought up 'short', at the very least. Yes, some of the Party's leaders should be sent to prison, and I do -not- mean a "Club Fed", either.

But =will= they have =any=thing done to them? Nope, not a chance in Hell! They already control the media, and who controls 'the message' controls the outcome. No, it shouldn't be that way, but until Americans stop acting like 'sheeple', that's what we're going to get.

Dame's picture
Dame 1 year 40 weeks ago

I remember reading (somewhere) that 'gerrymandering' lines stay in effect for 10 years before they can be repaired to represent a more sane voting area.....true? Must we wait for 10 years...this timeline will only enbolden those who pull these voter suppression/tactics.

Ra48's picture
Ra48 1 year 20 weeks ago

Foreign nationals are prohibited from making any contributions or expenditures in connection with any election..

Add comment

Login or register to post comments

Should public radio program in the public interest?

NPR is supposed to be our national public radio, but they're barely covering climate issues that are in the public's interest.

Only one month ago, a national New York Times/CBS News poll found that half of all Americans think that global warming is already having a serious impact. Sixty percent of those surveyed even said that protecting our environment should be a priority “even at the risk of curbing economic growth.”

From Cracking the Code:
"No one communicates more thoughtfully or effectively on the radio airwaves than Thom Hartmann. He gets inside the arguments and helps people to think them through—to understand how to respond when they’re talking about public issues with coworkers, neighbors, and friends. This book explores some of the key perspectives behind his approach, teaching us not just how to find the facts, but to talk about what they mean in a way that people will hear."
Paul Loeb, author of Soul of a Citizen
From Unequal Protection, 2nd Edition:
"Beneath the success and rise of American enterprise is an untold history that is antithetical to every value Americans hold dear. This is a seminal work, a godsend really, a clear message to every citizen about the need to reform our country, laws, and companies."
Paul Hawken, coauthor of Natural Capitalism and author of The Ecology of Commerce
From The Thom Hartmann Reader:
"With the ever-growing influence of corporate CEOs and their right-wing allies in all aspects of American life, Hartmann’s work is more relevant than ever. Throughout his career, Hartmann has spoken compellingly about the value of people-centered democracy and the challenges that millions of ordinary Americans face today as a result of a dogma dedicated to putting profit above all else. This collection is a rousing call for Americans to work together and put people first again."
Richard Trumka, President, AFL-CIO