How about a real choice---like "yes" or "no" answer? I'm not a big fan of McCain, but he has the military experience to at least understand what might be required. And right now, it looks more like Obama is the one who hasn't met a country he didn't want to invade or "bomb bomb bomb".
once again, i object to your simplistic poll: there's no place for someone to suggest mccain SHOULD be chairman. while i doubt few of your respondents would make that choice, denying the possibility smacks of stalinism, or worse, Republicanism.
As the last of the "Keating Five" in the Senate he has the bonafides to head the Banking Committee. After all, this will be the best CONgress Koch money can buy!!! If crazy John wasn't the son and grandson of Admirals his war exploits may very well have been limited to piloting a desk. But at least he fought unlike the gutlessness of the wanting to remain "politically viable" Slick Willie and the "champaign company" duty of Dumbya in the TANG when he bothered to show up, (those times he couldn't score coke) , or the "other priorities" of Dickhead Cheney.
"Hartmann combines a remarkable piece of historical research with a brilliant literary style to tell the grand story of corporate corruption and its consequences for society with the force and readability of a great novel."
—David C. Korten, author of When Corporations Rule the World and Agenda for A New Economy
From Screwed:
"If we are going to live in a Democracy, we need to have a healthy middle class. Thom Hartmann shows us how the ‘cons’ have wronged this country, and tells us what needs to be done to reclaim what it is to be American."
—Eric Utne, Founder, Utne magazine
From The Thom Hartmann Reader:
"Right through the worst of the Bush years and into the present, Thom Hartmann has been one of the very few voices constantly willing to tell the truth. Rank him up there with Jon Stewart, Bill Moyers, and Paul Krugman for having the sheer persistent courage of his convictions."
How about a real choice---like "yes" or "no" answer? I'm not a big fan of McCain, but he has the military experience to at least understand what might be required. And right now, it looks more like Obama is the one who hasn't met a country he didn't want to invade or "bomb bomb bomb".
once again, i object to your simplistic poll: there's no place for someone to suggest mccain SHOULD be chairman. while i doubt few of your respondents would make that choice, denying the possibility smacks of stalinism, or worse, Republicanism.
As the last of the "Keating Five" in the Senate he has the bonafides to head the Banking Committee. After all, this will be the best CONgress Koch money can buy!!! If crazy John wasn't the son and grandson of Admirals his war exploits may very well have been limited to piloting a desk. But at least he fought unlike the gutlessness of the wanting to remain "politically viable" Slick Willie and the "champaign company" duty of Dumbya in the TANG when he bothered to show up, (those times he couldn't score coke) , or the "other priorities" of Dickhead Cheney.