Daily Topics - Wednesday October 22nd, 2014
By shawnt56
Join Thom in our chatroom during the program!
Be sure to check out our new videos: CARBON & LAST HOURS
- both narrated by Leonardo DiCaprio
Hour One: Time to rethink the war on terror...
Hour Two: Should clergy be fired for refusing to obey the law? Archbishop Council Nedd II, Project 21
Hour Three: Why Conservatives should love a minimum wage hike - James Sherk, Heritage Foundation
Comments
#2
I would arrange the individual tax code to give deductions from taxable income for 1) food, 2) clothing, 3) shelter, 4) transportation, 5) education, and 6) medicine.
Once the family situation is taken into account, the first four deductions would be for average costs. This would encourage people to live less ostentatiously, and any extravagant expenditures in those categories by rich people would raise the average.
After the deductions have been included, I'd still have a graduated tax bracket system with a 0% bracket at the bottom for the first, say, $10,000.
#3
The American People have little to no understanding of the concept of the Commons. A book dealing with the Commons and its erosion of late is, in my opinion, desperately needed. The concept could be examined as:
a) current components of the U.S. Commons,
b) assault on the Commons,
c) desirable additions to the U.S. Commons,
-1) now extant in advanced countries,
-2) called for due to new technologies,
d) economics of the Commons,
e) ecology of the Commons,
f) areas which should be de-emphasized as a proportion of the Commons.
g) the Constitution and the Common Good
#4
Regarding the person not understanding that not-taxing is the same as a tax subsidy. The caller clearly did not grock what you meant by the cost of community services.
The community provides services to everyone and to all property. The church receives some of those services, directly or indirectly. For example, not only do they get police coverage directly, but they get the benefit of there being a police force protecting the neighborhood. What if the city did not provide police, fire, sewer, water, etc. services to a church that did not pay taxes, they would still get benefit of their neighbors having those services.
I wonder if he would be okay with the state not taxing gay couples, or left handed people, or rich people, or everyone without his last name? Perhaps he would reconsider the fairness of not taxing some people or entitites. The same is true if you own a business. If you are taxed more because you are a good business citizen and employ American workers, etc. you are taxed at a higher rate than a slimy company who offshores their operations and taxes.
Thom's Blog Is On the Move
By webmaster
Hello All
Thom's blog in this space and moving to a new home.
Please follow us across to hartmannreport.com - this will be the only place going forward to read Thom's blog posts and articles.
Images of Thom
At Mondragon - both the mountain and the cooperative city - in Spain (written about in "Threshold" book)
From Screwed:
"If we are going to live in a Democracy, we need to have a healthy middle class. Thom Hartmann shows us how the ‘cons’ have wronged this country, and tells us what needs to be done to reclaim what it is to be American."
From The Thom Hartmann Reader:
"In an age rife with media-inspired confusion and political cowardice, we yearn for a decent, caring, deeply human soul whose grasp of the problems confronting us provides a light by which we can make our way through the quagmire of lies, distortions, pandering, and hollow self-puffery that strips the American Dream of its promise. How lucky we are, then, to have access to the wit, wisdom, and willingness of Thom Hartmann, who shares with us here that very light, grown out of his own life experience."
From Cracking the Code:
"No one communicates more thoughtfully or effectively on the radio airwaves than Thom Hartmann. He gets inside the arguments and helps people to think them through—to understand how to respond when they’re talking about public issues with coworkers, neighbors, and friends. This book explores some of the key perspectives behind his approach, teaching us not just how to find the facts, but to talk about what they mean in a way that people will hear."
The libertarians you had on apparently haven't read the Constitution
or the Declaration of Independence. All over both its We not
Me or I as in WE the people, not Me the people They are stuck in the Articles of confederation, not the constitution.