We Know How Far Trump Will Go - How Far Will Republicans Go?
By Thom Hartmann A...
Colonel Vindman's testimony pretty much proves that Trump was trying to shake down Ukraine for information on Biden, and that the Republicans are doing everything they can to cover up this extortion attempt. The only question now is how far the Republicans are willing to go in supporting Trump's effort to damage Ukraine and extort them to create false information about Joe Biden.We Know How Far Trump Will Go - How Far Will Republicans Go?
-Thom
Comments
#2
Don't forget about DuPont in Pompton Lakes New Jersey.https://www.nj.com/passaic-county/2019/03/were-taking-on-dupont-murphys-ag-says-nj-is-suing-over-decades-of-pollution-at-these-4-sites.html
Thom's Blog Is On the Move
By webmaster
Hello All
Thom's blog in this space and moving to a new home.
Please follow us across to hartmannreport.com - this will be the only place going forward to read Thom's blog posts and articles.
Images of Thom
From Cracking the Code:
"No one communicates more thoughtfully or effectively on the radio airwaves than Thom Hartmann. He gets inside the arguments and helps people to think them through—to understand how to respond when they’re talking about public issues with coworkers, neighbors, and friends. This book explores some of the key perspectives behind his approach, teaching us not just how to find the facts, but to talk about what they mean in a way that people will hear."
From Screwed:
"Thom Hartmann’s book explains in simple language and with concrete research the details of the Neo-con’s war against the American middle class. It proves what many have intuited and serves to remind us that without a healthy, employed, and vital middle class, America is no more than the richest Third World country on the planet."
From Screwed:
"Once again, Thom Hartmann hits the bull’s eye with a much needed exposé of the so-called ‘free market.’ Anyone concerned about the future of our nation needs to read Screwed now."
Sorry! Don't understand the obssession with pendantics, symantics and word meanings in this enquiry (???)
Purpose and intent is not considered for some strange reason
Do we have "reasonable doubt" or "balance of probabilities"?