Vodafone are one of the UK's biggest and best networks. In this short guide, we look at the benefits of opting for a contract with them rather than their rivals. www.mobilebell.org
Considering the plethora of evidence that geoengineering is causing climate change/global warming, and that this issue is a hoax, perhaps we should educate ourselves about the chemtrails that are so prevalent in our skies today. More and more people are waking up to understand the sinister agenda behind the chemtrails, and the time to address this is NOW!
I hope they can, but its going to be very hard because of all the gerrymandering they did after the 2010 election in the states they controlled, anytime the year ends in o, that is a census year, and there is always redistricting due to population losses, or gains, in all but 2 states the party in the majority gets to draw up the districts.
Mob psychology rules. Through yelling loud and louder, anyone can get people who have no independent thought process to follow them, even if following them into action is against their own best inerests. Example #1= Donald (the bully) Trump.
Thom often says we do not have a right to vote. That is wrong! Please comment on this.
We have just as much right to vote as to own guns.
If I must register to vote then registering guns only makes sense based on equal protection. In the same respect if gun registration is anti constitutional, as the right wing claims, then what about all of the laws being placed to DENY OR ABRIDGE our rights to vote.
Constitutional amendments guaranteeing all citizens the right to vote
the right to vote
15 th
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. [1]
19th
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
24th
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.
Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. [1]
26th
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.
Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. [1] The second amendment. A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
Thom - - this is not on point but I heard your discussion on last Friday’s show about why the banksters hate Federal debt and deficits. I thought you’d be interested in what the great James Galbraith had to say about this very issue in his article, “In Defense of Deficits” (Nation magazine, March 4, 2010):
“To put things crudely, there are two ways to get the increase in total spending that we call ‘economic growth.’ One way is for government to spend. The other is for banks to lend. Leaving aside short-term adjustments like increased net exports or financial innovation, that’s basically all there is. Governments and banks are the two entities with the power to create something from nothing. If total spending power is to grow, one or the other of these two great financial motors–public deficits or private loans–has to be in action.
“For ordinary people, public budget deficits, despite their bad reputation, are much better than private loans. Deficits put money in private pockets. Private households get more cash. They own that cash free and clear, and they can spend it as they like. If they wish, they can also convert it into interest-earning government bonds or they can repay their debts. This is called an increase in “net financial wealth.” Ordinary people benefit, but there is nothing in it for banks.
“And this, in the simplest terms, explains the deficit phobia of Wall Street, the corporate media and the right-wing economists. Bankers don’t like budget deficits because they compete with bank loans as a source of growth. When a bank makes a loan, cash balances in private hands also go up. But now the cash is not owned free and clear. There is a contractual obligation to pay interest and to repay principal. If the enterprise defaults, there may be an asset left over–a house or factory or company–that will then become the property of the bank. It’s easy to see why bankers love private credit but hate public deficits.
“All of this should be painfully obvious, but it is deeply obscure. It is obscure because legions of Wall Streeters–led notably in our time by Peter Peterson and his front man, former comptroller general David Walker, and including the Robert Rubin wing of the Democratic Party and numerous “bipartisan” enterprises like the Concord Coalition and the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget–have labored mightily to confuse the issues.”
Stop a Con-Con From my perspective, If the american electorate new a little something about the Constitution and held their representatives accountable, then we would not be in the mess we are today. Do we need new liberty Amendments when our representatives do not abide by the current constitution?......VIDEO: Hat Tip to Art Thompson.
We can look in the backgrounds of all religious texts and find violence against infidels. But some Americans like to single-out Muslims to incite fear and discrimination against the current refugees and American Muslims already living here, who are just as appalled and shocked as all the rest of us at Daesh's souless brutality. Most (75% of American Christians and Jewish people) are moderates. It's you gun-toting militia-type so-called Americans who are dangerous for all the rest of us. I guess you don't feel safe without yourBibles and guns. I don't carry either one of those things. I don't need religion or a gun to feel safe. I think you who DO need those two crutches, need to grow up. America would be so much safer without so many cowards, dependent upon God and an AK47 or a concealed weapon and permit. Guns kill over 30K Americans and tourists in our country, and I think that's a damn shame! Having a gun with which you're familiar in your home for protection is fine, but when you're afraid to step off your property without one, there's someething wrong with YOU. I know that will offend a lot of you - mostly you who support that rich egomaniac named Trump, and some of his fellow candidates. I can see through Trump's rhetoric. I don't understand why you who will never have a deep breath's chance of making a tenth of what that man has, think he's the answer to your safety. He will ruin our reputation in the world, he will make promises he knows he can never keep just to get you to his rallies and your votes. He may know how to build attractive walls to keep out the "dangerous Latinos and the fierce Canadians" (both groups that have far more in common with America than most of YOU!) And yet you want to keep them out... along with helpless refugees fleeing the very terrorists all of you are fearing. NO religion is "evil." They all are just methods used for the past 2000+ years to control the masses and ensure procreation of the next generations who will also be controlled by whatever religious masters they're born to respect. Oh - and all these controlled masses finance the religions to whom you're devoted. I prefer to give my tithe money to the ones who really need it - the homeless, the sick, the down-trodden, and the ones who are looking for jobs they may never find, plus the helpless animals we're obliterating at about a million a day, nation-wide, just because they're housed in kill-shelters and there aren't enough people to adopt them all before they're put to death. Trump and people similar to him are not your saviors. They will disappoint you, and probably cause America to lose most of our allies, should one of those jerks get elected. You need to put down your Bibles and guns long enough to read about the candidates you tend to worship enough to vote into Office. If you don't, you will get what YOU deserve, but the rest of us will have to suffer for your ignorance. I've lived 70 years without guns and Bibles. I don't fear stepping out my door and driving through Los Angeles with the top down on my car. I don't understand why so many of you aren't as brave as I am. I'm a 95 pound woman. What are your excuses for not feeling as safe and free as I always have?
My friend Kevin Smith says:
I'm totally agnostic, but have a BA in comparative world religions. I have read the Koran and Haddith in several translations. I have no problem with freedom of religion...but I won't be silent when it comes to pointing out just how evil and violent the teachings of Islam are. And its damn evil. More of an evil political ideology bent on world dominion (caliphate) than an actual religion.
Only 16 to 19 Americans have died in America from a person that claims to be a muslim. How many so-called Christians have killed this year? Stop the Muslim bashing Republicans!
What is needed is an international carbon tax levied uniformly with the revenue distributed to nations on the basis of their population with a reduction taken out for that country's contribution to historical cumulative greenhouse gas emissions. The remainder of the collected funds could go back to each country to be used to pay for adaptation and costs associated with climate related disasters. In that way, the concept of external costs for carbon fuels becomes apparent, and social responsibility for the increasing impacts are also made apparent. Every year, a nation's proportion of the collected funds should be adjusted to reflect the progress they have made in reducing their contribution of greenhouse gases.
The law serves the rich and powerful, the homeless are anything but and a nuisance and annoyance to the rich and powerful, like do many insects. Before the homeless and their advocates got it together and made some noise the homeless were were very much treated like pesky insects and still are somewhat.
When you don't have power or influence you don't have rights.
So fifty thousand out of 1.6 billion use the #YouAintNoMuslimBruv on Twitter... so I think that is stretching it a little. I think it is better to just say a lot Muslims are unhappy.
When were campaign promises first made? When the Constitution was new, did candidates rely on their records and news thereof, or did they primarily make public appearances and orate as candidates do now?
Took me a couple of days to find the time to read through your long posts. Most of your false flag examples are credible because they were reported by people with nothing to gain. Unfortunately, you've turned to sources that spout climate denial for your understanding of global warming/climate change that are funded by fossil fuel interersts. One needs only to observe what is happening faster in northern latitudes to recognize global warming is real and to research what legitimate sources are reporting. No organized group or country will gain from global warming, but fossil fuel interests will suffer. Consider the source and follow the money. I'm still eating tomatoes from my garden in December in central Minnesota that I picked green two weeks ago. Normally they are killed by frost in September or early October.
Vodafone are one of the UK's biggest and best networks. In this short guide, we look at the benefits of opting for a contract with them rather than their rivals. www.mobilebell.org
Fear Kills Rationality.
{… a rhyme …}
“Fear itself” Trump person-i-fies,
and all the dangers which fears comprise.
Rationality dies
when panics arise,
and the judgment which “common sense” implies.
... ... ...
{To the Editor:
Forgive the poor grammar
that “fears comprise dangers”.}
=================================
Considering the plethora of evidence that geoengineering is causing climate change/global warming, and that this issue is a hoax, perhaps we should educate ourselves about the chemtrails that are so prevalent in our skies today. More and more people are waking up to understand the sinister agenda behind the chemtrails, and the time to address this is NOW!
it's started
How to destroy banksters ***((()))
Break them up first into very much smaller units
Legislate against "fractional reserve banking"
Very simple
Sadly some people lost their lives trying
Lincoln likely was first...Kennedy + brother were in the crosshairs it seems
I hope they can, but its going to be very hard because of all the gerrymandering they did after the 2010 election in the states they controlled, anytime the year ends in o, that is a census year, and there is always redistricting due to population losses, or gains, in all but 2 states the party in the majority gets to draw up the districts.
Mob psychology rules. Through yelling loud and louder, anyone can get people who have no independent thought process to follow them, even if following them into action is against their own best inerests. Example #1= Donald (the bully) Trump.
To Shane,
Thom often says we do not have a right to vote. That is wrong! Please comment on this.
We have just as much right to vote as to own guns.
If I must register to vote then registering guns only makes sense based on equal protection. In the same respect if gun registration is anti constitutional, as the right wing claims, then what about all of the laws being placed to DENY OR ABRIDGE our rights to vote.
Constitutional amendments guaranteeing all citizens the right to vote
the right to vote
15 th
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. [1]
19th
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
24th
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.
Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. [1]
26th
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.
Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. [1] The second amendment. A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
Thom - - this is not on point but I heard your discussion on last Friday’s show about why the banksters hate Federal debt and deficits. I thought you’d be interested in what the great James Galbraith had to say about this very issue in his article, “In Defense of Deficits” (Nation magazine, March 4, 2010):
“To put things crudely, there are two ways to get the increase in total spending that we call ‘economic growth.’ One way is for government to spend. The other is for banks to lend. Leaving aside short-term adjustments like increased net exports or financial innovation, that’s basically all there is. Governments and banks are the two entities with the power to create something from nothing. If total spending power is to grow, one or the other of these two great financial motors–public deficits or private loans–has to be in action.
“For ordinary people, public budget deficits, despite their bad reputation, are much better than private loans. Deficits put money in private pockets. Private households get more cash. They own that cash free and clear, and they can spend it as they like. If they wish, they can also convert it into interest-earning government bonds or they can repay their debts. This is called an increase in “net financial wealth.” Ordinary people benefit, but there is nothing in it for banks.
“And this, in the simplest terms, explains the deficit phobia of Wall Street, the corporate media and the right-wing economists. Bankers don’t like budget deficits because they compete with bank loans as a source of growth. When a bank makes a loan, cash balances in private hands also go up. But now the cash is not owned free and clear. There is a contractual obligation to pay interest and to repay principal. If the enterprise defaults, there may be an asset left over–a house or factory or company–that will then become the property of the bank. It’s easy to see why bankers love private credit but hate public deficits.
“All of this should be painfully obvious, but it is deeply obscure. It is obscure because legions of Wall Streeters–led notably in our time by Peter Peterson and his front man, former comptroller general David Walker, and including the Robert Rubin wing of the Democratic Party and numerous “bipartisan” enterprises like the Concord Coalition and the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget–have labored mightily to confuse the issues.”
Stop a Con-Con
From my perspective, If the american electorate new a little something about the Constitution and held their representatives accountable, then we would not be in the mess we are today. Do we need new liberty Amendments when our representatives do not abide by the current constitution?......VIDEO: Hat Tip to Art Thompson.
We can look in the backgrounds of all religious texts and find violence against infidels. But some Americans like to single-out Muslims to incite fear and discrimination against the current refugees and American Muslims already living here, who are just as appalled and shocked as all the rest of us at Daesh's souless brutality. Most (75% of American Christians and Jewish people) are moderates. It's you gun-toting militia-type so-called Americans who are dangerous for all the rest of us. I guess you don't feel safe without yourBibles and guns. I don't carry either one of those things. I don't need religion or a gun to feel safe. I think you who DO need those two crutches, need to grow up. America would be so much safer without so many cowards, dependent upon God and an AK47 or a concealed weapon and permit. Guns kill over 30K Americans and tourists in our country, and I think that's a damn shame! Having a gun with which you're familiar in your home for protection is fine, but when you're afraid to step off your property without one, there's someething wrong with YOU. I know that will offend a lot of you - mostly you who support that rich egomaniac named Trump, and some of his fellow candidates. I can see through Trump's rhetoric. I don't understand why you who will never have a deep breath's chance of making a tenth of what that man has, think he's the answer to your safety. He will ruin our reputation in the world, he will make promises he knows he can never keep just to get you to his rallies and your votes. He may know how to build attractive walls to keep out the "dangerous Latinos and the fierce Canadians" (both groups that have far more in common with America than most of YOU!) And yet you want to keep them out... along with helpless refugees fleeing the very terrorists all of you are fearing. NO religion is "evil." They all are just methods used for the past 2000+ years to control the masses and ensure procreation of the next generations who will also be controlled by whatever religious masters they're born to respect. Oh - and all these controlled masses finance the religions to whom you're devoted. I prefer to give my tithe money to the ones who really need it - the homeless, the sick, the down-trodden, and the ones who are looking for jobs they may never find, plus the helpless animals we're obliterating at about a million a day, nation-wide, just because they're housed in kill-shelters and there aren't enough people to adopt them all before they're put to death. Trump and people similar to him are not your saviors. They will disappoint you, and probably cause America to lose most of our allies, should one of those jerks get elected. You need to put down your Bibles and guns long enough to read about the candidates you tend to worship enough to vote into Office. If you don't, you will get what YOU deserve, but the rest of us will have to suffer for your ignorance. I've lived 70 years without guns and Bibles. I don't fear stepping out my door and driving through Los Angeles with the top down on my car. I don't understand why so many of you aren't as brave as I am. I'm a 95 pound woman. What are your excuses for not feeling as safe and free as I always have?
…-isms
{… a rhyme …}
Not so much opti- as pessi-
in my set of -misms.
Not much order. Mostly messy
are mankind’s schisms
and other -isms
such as race- and cyni-
and fasc- and many
anOther {a-plenty} a-plenny.
{Not much -ism human-,
so disaster is a-bloomin’.}
. . . .
Picasso painted this fragmentation:
https://mhsartgallerymac.wikispaces.com/file/view/malev2.jpg/427520326/malev2.jpg
=============================
My friend Kevin Smith says:
I'm totally agnostic, but have a BA in comparative world religions. I have read the Koran and Haddith in several translations. I have no problem with freedom of religion...but I won't be silent when it comes to pointing out just how evil and violent the teachings of Islam are. And its damn evil. More of an evil political ideology bent on world dominion (caliphate) than an actual religion.
Only 16 to 19 Americans have died in America from a person that claims to be a muslim. How many so-called Christians have killed this year? Stop the Muslim bashing Republicans!
Republicans don't lead! They mis-lead and call it close enough.
Clearly the active support of the Muslim community is needed.
But, some percent of the Muslim community condones the violence.
See this PEW article:
http://www.pewglobal.org/2005/07/14/iv-how-muslims-view-relations-with-the-world/
Its not just the guys who pick up the guns, but those who support them.
So the larger the Muslim population in a country, up go the likely number of supporters.
How governments around the planet choose to control those numbers
remains to be seen.
ct
What is needed is an international carbon tax levied uniformly with the revenue distributed to nations on the basis of their population with a reduction taken out for that country's contribution to historical cumulative greenhouse gas emissions. The remainder of the collected funds could go back to each country to be used to pay for adaptation and costs associated with climate related disasters. In that way, the concept of external costs for carbon fuels becomes apparent, and social responsibility for the increasing impacts are also made apparent. Every year, a nation's proportion of the collected funds should be adjusted to reflect the progress they have made in reducing their contribution of greenhouse gases.
Sorry! I see no evidence of any action by muslims to counteract any of these terrorist events at any location on the planet!!!
Kindly prove me wrong!
Have a nice day.
The law serves the rich and powerful, the homeless are anything but and a nuisance and annoyance to the rich and powerful, like do many insects. Before the homeless and their advocates got it together and made some noise the homeless were were very much treated like pesky insects and still are somewhat.
When you don't have power or influence you don't have rights.
So fifty thousand out of 1.6 billion use the #YouAintNoMuslimBruv on Twitter... so I think that is stretching it a little. I think it is better to just say a lot Muslims are unhappy.
Falwell Jr. urged students at Liberty U. to get guns to protect themselves on campus.
Question:
How effective would this be in deterring suicidal jihadists who expect to die anyway?
Jesus would be proud!
When were campaign promises first made? When the Constitution was new, did candidates rely on their records and news thereof, or did they primarily make public appearances and orate as candidates do now?
How has Thom missed the terms "ammosexual", "gun humper" (I know Paul said "gun hugger", but that's new to me), and "hypochristian" until today?
Doc,
Took me a couple of days to find the time to read through your long posts. Most of your false flag examples are credible because they were reported by people with nothing to gain. Unfortunately, you've turned to sources that spout climate denial for your understanding of global warming/climate change that are funded by fossil fuel interersts. One needs only to observe what is happening faster in northern latitudes to recognize global warming is real and to research what legitimate sources are reporting. No organized group or country will gain from global warming, but fossil fuel interests will suffer. Consider the source and follow the money. I'm still eating tomatoes from my garden in December in central Minnesota that I picked green two weeks ago. Normally they are killed by frost in September or early October.