The answer is "yes", but not because the so-called "Roberts Court" sides with Republicans, but because it sides with corporations against ordinary citizens.
just the idea of not approving new members to the supreme court because you don't like the presidant or their affiliated parties alone is too politicised.
"Thom Hartmann seeks out interesting subjects from such disparate outposts of curiosity that you have to wonder whether or not he uncovered them or they selected him."
—Leonardo DiCaprio, actor, producer, and environmental activist
From The Thom Hartmann Reader:
"Right through the worst of the Bush years and into the present, Thom Hartmann has been one of the very few voices constantly willing to tell the truth. Rank him up there with Jon Stewart, Bill Moyers, and Paul Krugman for having the sheer persistent courage of his convictions."
—Bill McKibben, author of Eaarth
From Screwed:
"Thom Hartmann’s book explains in simple language and with concrete research the details of the Neo-con’s war against the American middle class. It proves what many have intuited and serves to remind us that without a healthy, employed, and vital middle class, America is no more than the richest Third World country on the planet."
—Peter Coyote, Actor and author of Sleeping Where I Fall
Alito, Scalia and Thomas are regularly involved in partisan politics, which was once prohibited.
Roland
Yes they have, instead of being impartial judges, they are right wing polititans in black robes.
The answer is "yes", but not because the so-called "Roberts Court" sides with Republicans, but because it sides with corporations against ordinary citizens.
just the idea of not approving new members to the supreme court because you don't like the presidant or their affiliated parties alone is too politicised.