s.b. "credit card interest rates have been jacked up to 31%"

I am assuming that a “ghost” written book is one where an either lazy or untalented “author” without much useful to say puts together a jumble of thoughts and ideas for someone who is a competent writer to sort through and attempt to put into a coherent format. It is useful to keep this in mind when regarding Sarah Palin’s new book, written by a ghost writer. The book, apparently, is of little of interest other than to observe Palin engaging in a whine and attack fest, which according to her targets is based on fabrication or fictions of her imagination. Other than expressing rather broad policy ideas she borrowed from someone else, she offers nothing that suggests she has thought much about the problems the country faces, or what to do about them.

It is also interesting to note that she criticized the McCain campaign for being “PC” for not pursuing the Rev. Wright issue, or allowing her to make her racial “point”—although it should be pointed out that the “mainstream” media did the job in nauseating fashion for them. Yet Palin had no problem (as she did with Oprah Winfrey) to make herself, and Hillary Clinton, as “victims” of “sexism” during the campaign, based on anecdotal evidence. The cover of Newsweek magazine, featuring Palin in a jogging outfit, was apparently meant to bring focus on Palin’s lack of substance. But as might be expected, Palin hypocritically gave the “PC” response that this was an engagement in “sexism.” The cover photo originally appeared in Runners World this past summer; it was not “doctored” by Newsweek. If she now considers it “demeaning,” I wonder what she thinks of that wild-eyed, wild-haired Charles Manson look-alike on that cover of Vogue magazine.

In regard to Obama’s visit to China, it seems to have accomplish little concrete for American interests—not surprising considering China’s increasingly bullying posturing. A story in a local paper the other day made the point that the fortunate few American exporters to China are being “schooled” by Chinese “big shots” on the “top quality” demanded by Chinese consumers. Such demands seem odd, considering the lack of quality—not to mention safety—of many products produced by China, most notably toys, baby formulas and pet food. Yet despite the fact that U.S. exports to China are half of either that to Canada or Mexico (the U.S.’ two biggest export markets, sorry to say to the anti-NAFTA people), American producers are jumping through flaming hoops to outdo each other in groveling to Chinese buyers.

Obama may have been facing another obstacle beyond arrogance in dealing with the Chinese—racism. Chinese attitudes towards dark-skinned people (also true of the Japanese) can be said to be either patronizing (when condemning alleged U.S.’ human rights failures) or defined by the kind of base stereotypes and prejudices that most white Americans would cringe from enunciating in public. Many Chinese seem uncomprehending that the U.S. elected as president someone who is not white; the fact that Obama is “half-white” seems to be the most logical “explanation” for this strange phenomenon.

Bill J,

Brilliant!

Why is it that we as a society believe it when the upper classes tell us that they are morally superior? We don't need government involvement in the market place because the market is owned by the upper classes. We need government involvement concerning the police and the military because the lower classes are morally inferior.

Re: David Barton

http://www.liarsforjesus.com/