You Betcha! Bonuses.....

banster 1 imagesGoldman Sachs may reduce CEO Lloyd Blankfein’s bonus because of the uproar over the reported $100 million he is set to get, according to a Wall Street consultant says. Meanwhile, the compensation of the CEO of the world's largest bank - much bigger than Blankfein's Goldman Sachs - was a total of just $263,000 last year.  Period.  Why?  Because it's the Commerce and Industry Bank of China, a country where the banks are tightly regulated utilities whose job is to handle and protect people's money and make loans available to consumers and businesses.  Before Reagan, it was pretty much that way here in the US, too, but when he stopped enforcing the Sherman Act, allowing huge banking mega-mergers, and Republicans and Clinton blew up banks basic functions in 1999 and 2000 turning them into casinos, things rather changed here.  Blankfein's purported $100 million bonus would be a shocking, pornographic embarrassment in Sweden or Norway or Denmark - countries that are far from Communist Dictatorships like China.  Good banking practices, it seems, are just good banking practices.  And we should re-adopt them here and put an end to the looting of America by the banksters.

In Strange News....Sarah Palin is calling on President Obama to fire his chief of staff Rahm Emanuel for using the phrase “f—ing retarded” in a meeting with liberal allies. Writing on Facebook, Palin said, “Rahm’s slur on all God’s children with cognitive and developmental disabilities – and the people who love them – is unacceptable, and it’s heartbreaking.”  Ah so - Sarah Palin has become a liberal proponent of the rights of the disabled?  No, not really.  Just a cheap political shot.


john (not verified) 9 years 50 weeks ago

I need to get my grubby hands on the study that says that incomes catch up to tax increases on wage earners in 1 to 3 years. Thom has mentioned it several times, and last time used Denmark as an example. It also appears here:

"Over time (typically one to three years) his wages will rise enough to compensate for the lost income."

I need the academic support for that statement. Thank you very much. Link or Bibliographic information will do.

Lev Parnas is afraid of Bill Barr - and he should be

Thom plus logo Lev Parnas recently told Rachel Maddow that he's more afraid of Attorney General Bill Barr than he is of the mobbed-up foreign oligarchs he has betrayed. Barr, after all, can weaponize our prisons to punish Parnas.

Latest Headlines

Who rejected United States-North Korea peace talks?

There were conflicting reports on Sunday regarding a recent proposal for United States-North Korea peace talks which was allegedly made before North Korea"s recent nuclear test

U.K. Pound Falls As Markets Get Brexit Jitters

Bloomberg said on Monday the pound had sustained its biggest fall against the dollar in 11 months

Clinton: I'll defend Israel but push for 'two-state solution

Hillary Clinton believes both Republican candidates Donald Trump and Ted Cruz "missed the mark" with their approach to the Israel-Palestinian Arab conflict
From Screwed:
"Thom Hartmann’s book explains in simple language and with concrete research the details of the Neo-con’s war against the American middle class. It proves what many have intuited and serves to remind us that without a healthy, employed, and vital middle class, America is no more than the richest Third World country on the planet."
Peter Coyote, Actor and author of Sleeping Where I Fall
From The Thom Hartmann Reader:
"Thom Hartmann seeks out interesting subjects from such disparate outposts of curiosity that you have to wonder whether or not he uncovered them or they selected him."
Leonardo DiCaprio, actor, producer, and environmental activist
From The Thom Hartmann Reader:
"Thom Hartmann is a creative thinker and committed small-d democrat. He has dealt with a wide range of topics throughout his life, and this book provides an excellent cross section. The Thom Hartmann Reader will make people both angry and motivated to act."
Dean Baker, economist and author of Plunder and Blunder, False Profits, and Taking Economics Seriously