Daily Topics - Friday March 23rd, 2012
By shawnt56
Catch The Thom Hartmann Program LIVE at our new time, 3-6pm Eastern!
Anything Goes on Townhall Friday
Hour One: Brunch With Bernie - Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) takes your calls
Hour Two: "Koch Brothers Exposed" - Robert Greenwald, Brave New Films
Comments
#2
Be aware, the term "propaganda" is passe, the correct term now is "public relations". No joke, Edward Bernays was the one who coined the new phrase because of the stigma "propaganda" was becoming associated with. So whenever you hear someone say they are working in "public relations", mentally note that they are propagandists. There is no coincidence that so many corporations and politicians openly rely on their "public relations" people to talk with the public.
N
#3
Nokia is Finnish.
#4
Trichotillomaniacally ugly. Wow, and the picture on Wikipedia is in fact ugly. I actually know someone who pulled her hair out in her sleep (not personally witnessed, but testified to me by her husband).
#5
So --if it was a white teen walking with his hood up and eating candy --- would Zimmerman have shot him?
I don't think I have heard anyone ask that question, and it needs to be asked.
#6
You mean "if it had been a white teen". Using "was" makes it conditional, meaning that it's possible that the victim was a white teen. Using "had been" makes it subjunctive, i.e. contrary to fact.
#7
Why Zimmerman shot Trayon isn't really the important question, the question is how can the law being used to protect him even be logically applied in this case. Fine Zimmerman was standing his ground, but everything I've heard about the case is that Trayon was trying to move away. Now whether Zimmerman shot him because he was black, wasn't cooperating with him, he didn't like his attitude, he wasn't wearing the right clothes, the moon was waxing and not waning... is all equally irrelevant, the fact of the matter is the burden of proof is on Zimmerman to prove reasonably that he had reason to feel threatened. From all the evidence I've heard (which isn't much, though the phone calls are pretty damning), he hasn't made that case. Frankly his true motivation vs his stated motivation is beside the point, the fact of the matter is, as far as I can see, he broke the law outright be confronting someone and provoking a response unnessarily (unnessarily because he was told he shouldn't follow him). He brought on a confrontation to himself, by that act alone he is being aggressive, so I can't see how he can claim any sort of defense. At least to the point that he wasn't arrested and tried in a court of law for taking a life of an unarmed person.
N
Thom's Blog Is On the Move
By webmaster
Hello All
Thom's blog in this space and moving to a new home.
Please follow us across to hartmannreport.com - this will be the only place going forward to read Thom's blog posts and articles.
Images of Thom
From The Thom Hartmann Reader:
"Thom Hartmann channels the best of the American Founders with voice and pen. His deep attachment to a democratic civil society is just the medicine America needs."
From The Thom Hartmann Reader:
"Through compelling personal stories, Hartmann presents a dramatic and deeply disturbing picture of humans as a profoundly troubled species. Hope lies in his inspiring vision of our enormous unrealized potential and his description of the path to its realization."
From Cracking the Code:
"Thom Hartmann ought to be bronzed. His new book sets off from the same high plane as the last and offers explicit tools and how-to advice that will allow you to see, hear, and feel propaganda when it's directed at you and use the same techniques to refute it. His book would make a deaf-mute a better communicator. I want him on my reading table every day, and if you try one of his books, so will you."
So Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum have chosen their Secret Service codenames: Javelin and Petrus. A stick and a stone--so Freudian, unless Romney chose his to symbolize that he's a stick in the mud, and Santorum to symbolize that he's as dumb as a rock.