Remembering 9/11 & the Bush administration's incompetence

The nation remembers 9/11 today, and is reminded about the utter failures of the Bush administration leading up to the attacks. As a new op-ed published last night in the New York Times uncovers, the Bush administration was repeatedly warned in the months leading up to the attack that terrorists were operating in America and determined to carry out an attack. But rather than doing anything about it – the Bush Administration dismissed the warnings as mere distractions pushed by Saddam Hussein, even though there was absolutely no proof of any coordination between Bin Laden and Hussein.
The incompetence – and downright negligence – of the Bush administration is staggering – and Americans paid dearly for it. It’s now been 11 years since the attacks – and since then we’ve seen 11 years of continuing war, 11 years of continuing surveillance, and 11 years of continuing disintegration of our civil liberties.
Today we honor the victims who lost their lives on that day, but as a nation we must also recognize the profound impact the decisions our leaders made in the months and years after 9/11 that have made our country less safe, destabilized the planet, and shredded our constitution. Let’s hope that future memorials to this day aren’t clouded by war, anger, and xenophobia.
Comments


press release
Sept. 10, 2012, 10:00 a.m. EDT
The 9/11 Hijackers: Fraud in Official Video Exhibits Uncovered by Expert Panel
NEW YORK, Sept. 10, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- A Panel of 22 researchers into the history of 9/11 has uncovered evidence of fraud in the photographic images of Muslim hijackers prior to boarding the planes on 9/11.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-911-hijackers-fraud-in-official-vid...
Read Chris Bollyn's new book here (pdf-from his web site):
http://www.bollyn.com/solving-9-11-the-book#article_12159

Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out is a very important documentary. I hope Thom will take calls from the 9/11 Truth community. If I'm crazy for believing the scientific theory that WTC 1, 2 & 7 were demolished via controlled demolition, I see no reason to believe that global warming exists or smoking causes cancer. I don't like the inescapable inside job implications any more than anyone else does. But, the laws of physics weren't suspended on 9/11/2001.

I think, like the Dems we should be thinking "forward" and put all our efforts into making sure this doesn't ever happen again. The only people to blame are the ones who hijacked those planes and crashed them into those buildings.

I wonder how Larry Silverstein comemmorates 9/11?

on 9/11? uh, my birthday? oh yeah i remember! I thought it was the day that as a society of gluts and pigs that somehow we would finally be humbled. Even wrote a nice little poem that hung in my shop window almost up until Christmas, that many a passer by asked to have a copy of until one day one of the glut-pigs (my superior) told me to remove it from the window. 11 years since? America is no longer home of free and brave its more like a land of cowards, political crooks and cranks and selfish little pigs. A me,me,me sort of place. the rich get richer the poor get poorer people screwin' anyone they can to get ahead and soldiers slog off to a forgotten war and our elected officials just keep pissin' in the wind as the little red dog continue to brainwash the mindless minions. And me? just angry at myself for not making the gajillions i wanted to so i could buy a way into the lime light and shoot my mouth off about the idiocy of the whole thing! meanwhile in chicago yet again the pigs are sticking it to the working stiffs as we seemingly continue our social downward spiral. can't give the educators a 2% hike yet administrators and others in the education system get monster hikes? WTF! Man todays my birthday! I never thought at fitty i would have such a bad taste in my mouth over what "we" the once united now divided states have become, truly,truly sad. but as all pressing on so shall I, just hope those pigs don't make off with the rest of money while i'm sleeping in the night....
one last thing in looking at the Chicago thing? it appears someone wants us all working for minimum wage, huh?

I remember seeing a photo on TV that showed both Bush's on each side of Bin Laden with their arms around him. Bush Sr. and Bin Laden had a falling out and Bush Jr. made it a point to "get even". Bush won 2 elections fraudalently - that has been proven in court. Started a war in Iraq with Bin Laden as his excuse. We all know that they were Saudi nationals who bombed the trade center. Did he go after Saudi Arabia? No, Iraq. How many of those people died and our people for what - revenge? We will NOT let them steal this election. We are mobilizing and we will scrutinze Every single ballot - even if they are passing laws to stop our Right to verify the vote (CO, HB1036). The New Right or as Bush called them "The New World Order"! Democracy will prevail against their Theocracy/Oligarchy!!

Look, we live in a corrupt world. There is a pattern here. It goes back to Nixon in the 50's and those same people are still here. The John Birch Society. If you look at all of our nations tragedy's since 11/22/63, there are two common threads.
1. Sloppy investigations
2. The bush crime family.
Frankly, I think we are doomed to history repeating itself over and over again.

hb091666: that's exactly right! The law of physics...which nobody either seems to understand, or doesn't wish to. Just the law of physics disproves that the WTC buildings came down as a result of airliner crashes and the subsequent fires. The only way those buildings could have come down like that (ie: at very close to free fall speed) is if there were no resistance to the falling floors (as there would have been if it was just a matter of "pancaking" as the official government conspiracy theory suggested). And the floors were not just falling, they were being disintegrated as they fell...only by explosives could this have been done. OBL sure couldn't have pulled this off. All of the timing and logistics demands that 911 was an inside job.

You know this response had to be comming, Sooooo how many high jackers were there with box cutters ? We've all seen box cutters and we all pretty much know it would be next to impossible for a skinny arab with a , what ! A 1 inch depth blade, to kill a struggling vicitm with a box cutter. I suppose if they remained completely still while they allowed someone half their size to slash their jugular vein. How many high jackers total where there 11 or 14 ? How many per plane ? There are several highly decorated fighter pilots, former Marines who doubt this whole fairy tale. In fact there are more credible doubters with expertise than supporters. More than half the public in both the US and Europe believe the whole hoopla was a sloppy inside job, poorly executed, and poorly covered up. When the bottom half the structure of the twin towers isn't strong enough to stand when the weight of the top half is removed it defy's logic and 7th grade physics. Building 7
had a fire inside for no apparent reason and then colapsed for no apparent reason. For all the discredit by the right wing wackos telling us all we have tin foil wrapped around our heads It is overwhelming to almost all with an IQ over 80 that something went down that day which did not involve terrorist from outside the nation. The real terrorists where corporate capitalists taking control of a free democratic government for total control of international governments. They took control over millions of citizens as if they were livestock. Regardless of the consequesnces we all demand a complete unbiased investigation and bring the real criminals to justice. All those before and behind the scenes. I am disappointed in you Thom, Bill Moyers, and others who refuse to acknowlege the truth in order to avoid eroding their credibility and will eventually go down in history as cowards.

I won't go so far as to require that the Cheney/Bush Administration had a hand in the 9/11/01 coordinated New York, NY and Washington, DC attacks. HOWEVER from the PNAC "Project For a New American Century" document, etc, (and Naomi Klein's "Shock Doctrine") -- it is all too likely that (1) they "let it happen." (Where was NORAD that day?). And (2) they were ready to exploit it for their benefit when America's "2nd Pearl Harbor" occurred. And (3) they did exploit it to establish a base of empire in the oil-rich Middle-east, that continues today.
Please do NOT minimize their involvement as "incompetence and downright negligence" We don't know that and won't until the historians finally get to the bottom of this after a full investigation of all relevant facts -- something which has NOT occurred. To dismiss these obviously successful _?_'s is foolish and grossly underestimates the magnitude of the problem we people of USA and the world face today.
As an Engineer I am familiar with the "A&Efor 9/11 Truth" campaign; and I support only their call for a complete re-investigation of the resultant destruction of the WTC Complex, including unaddressed issues such as destruction of Building Seven.

kend: So, you mean that the 19 alleged hijackers are the only ones to blame and no one else? So OBL was not responsible?
The problem with using that idea of just looking toward the future and forgetting about the past is that if you were to apply that to everything else..we would not have progressed past Stone Age creatures. In order to succeed in the future, you have to know where you've been. Everything we know to be true today..and use constantly to progress even further has depended upon looking at the past..learning what others have learned and done and succeeded or failed at..in order to know what works and what doesn't.
If we used the philosophy that we shouldn't waste our time dwelling in the past then maybe we should forgive every single thief or murderer and just let them go. They are likely to commit those crimes again and again.
Hell, the Republican party couldn't even let go of Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky. They sure are looking to the past when they tell us that they want to reduce social programs so small they can drown them in bathtubs.
Funny, how the criminals just want us to forget about the past so they can continue to screw us in the future. They desperately don't want their treason to be widely known and believed by the majority of people. And saying: "let's just concentrate on the future" is part of how they hope to keep us all dumb and stupid. Unfortunately, they have a lot of Democrats, even Obama, parroting that phrase.

ptg0: I agree...it'll happen again! Maybe not exactly in the same way....but these elite powers will find some other way to cow the American people out of any ability to bring them to justice. Maybe that's why many people don't even wish to question the government's official conspiracy theory...it would shatter their comfortably numb, xenophobic, jingoistic paradigms.

I have always believed that the Bush administration knew, to the last detail, about the terrorists plans to fly ONE plane into ONE of the towers - and decided to "enhance" the plan for political AND monetary gain. I hope someday the truth will come out and the REAL threat to American ideals and freedom will be exposed as the traitors AND MURDERERS they are.
We need more spies spying on the spies...hackers digging for the truth and putting it on display for the whole world to see.

delster: Very well said! Exactly! Box cutters? Total bull.
I had to fly over to Europe a number of times after 911, and each time, going and coming back, even on different airlines, I was shocked that they served the meals with sharp, metal, serrated edged steak knives to everyone. This just made a mockery out of the whole bulls!!t of TSA taking away our fingernail files, etc. I even wrote TSA and several news media and nobody was even concerned about it at all. I have never even heard this story anywhere on the news in all the years since.
I certainly agree with you that many very visible media personalities tend to shun the topic questioning the government official conspiracy theory. I think that they are very afraid, just like many in the news media, of being labeled unpatriotic or conspiracy theorist. Just look what they did to Bill Maher (and many others..Bill Moyers..Cenk Uygur...etc) when they made comments that wasn't widely accepted...but turned out to be more accepted now. Look at what just happened to Abby Martin of Russia Today (great, new RT show...she doesn't pander to any political party...and in my opinion...she is very much worth watching). Abby Martin tried to question Rand Paul and wound up getting threats from Rand Paul's attorneys that they were going to sue her and get her press credentials revoked.
More and more people are finally starting to question authority...now that it is becoming pretty obvious to most that being patriotic doesn't really get you anything but screwed by the oligarchs.

I am amazed that no one bothered to mention the statements made by the architectural designer that created the buildings that were destroyed by the aircraft that flew into them! The main support structures that supported the two main towers were located on the outside of the buildings, not on the inside, as most conventional designs. Once the outer support skeleton was weakened, there were no inner support beams to hold the floors from pancaking downward. The weight of each failing and falling floor caused the floor beneath to fall down, one after the other. The buildings having their skeleton on the outside of the structure allowed for more room on the inside of the building. The buildings were not designed to support themselves once the outer support structures (skeleton) were weakened by the impact and the jet fuel that cascaded downward, melting the main support skeleton. This information was explained to the world by the team that designed the structures. Unfortunately I do not have a web site to go to that explains why the structures failed. I will Google what information I have to see if there is a report on line. I truly believe Bush and Cheney were capable of many evil things, but to believe they were responsible for the terrorist Muslims that flew aircraft into the towers and the information that was disclosed by the flight school who trained these terrorists was all fabricated is really reaching a bit too far. The idea that Bush and Cheney conspired to kill 3000+ Americans to start a meaningless war and they and their cohorts were the main force behind this is almost on the utter most fringes of thought! To believe they could actually pull this off and the only proof are conspiracy theorists that believe it was impossible for the aircraft loaded with fuel to destroy the towers, is almost psychotic and delusional to say the least. And did they also make up the stories involving the training of these men, to fly aircraft that were already airborne. To believe all the people that were involved was just a way to throw the blame in another direction to fool the American public and the World is unbelievable in itself. As I read what other commenters have declared as a conspiracy by Bush and others in his administration, all I hear are a group of angry people that will believe anything that decries of conspiracy to harm the American public. I mean really angry individuals, which will believe anything to justify their hate and distrust of the American government. Sorry guys, you're just a little too far out there for me........I guess you would just call me one of the masses that have been fooled by the evil government that runs this country. To believe that all the people that would have had to be involved in such a scheme have been silenced or unwilling to come forward is in itself is hard to believe. Ever try to keep a secret in Washington, let alone something of this magnitude from the World, good luck chasing the boogey men in Washington...And it is not blight on your record to believe you might need a little therapy! (HA)

After checking the internet for the architect that originally designed the Twin Towers, I found that his name is Minoru Yamasaki. He and his team of architects designed the Towers with a design that won their company the bid over many other firms. I will not go into depth concerning each detail that made his design different, but if you would like too, just Google his name and you too will find out all the information on his explanation of why and how the Towers were brought down. But if you’re a die-hard conspiracy theorist, you will probably find a reason why he is lying !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Is it not obvious why the Bush administration went to such lengths to pontificate on patriotism and the need to come together and protect the many freedoms we American supposedly enjoy? Is it not obvious why the debris was hauled away before anyone could see it, why such startling disjunctions have been erased, like discussions of the bombs that everyone close to the Twin Towers heard, or why Building 7 just mysteriously collapsed hours after the events on the morning of 9/11? Does anyone wonder why the 9/11 Truth Commission report is riddled with holes and dry as dust? And now those of us who thought we were voting for change and would somehow get to the bottom of what we knew in our heart of hearts was not evil in some axis spanning other parts of the globe, but right before us in Washington DC, now we are left with a gaping disillusionment that increases each day with new reports about this whistleblower, that CIA informant, the newest and latest enemy of the State. Who in all of this is the victim of paranoia and what motivates that paranoia? Remember Raskolnikov in Dostoyevsky’s novel, Crime and Punishment? Such a frantic rush to cover over the evidence, to create alibis and scapegoats. The great movement afoot is to protect not us but the evil that resides at our center. No one would get through the American justice system (the one we thought we had in days gone by) with the brazen distortions, lies and quick change artistry applied by the Bush Administration and now upheld by Mr. Obama. But this much we do know:
The future of America’s so-called freedoms was probably already marked down before 9/11 and the plan for what America has become there on the books ready to be enacted as soon as the first plane hit the North Tower on 9/11.
Check out this link if you want to know more about this event seen from the viewpoint of people who are not constrained to close their eyes, ears, hearts and minds lest they be seen as traitors:

I do not think anyone can pinpoint in time when we were taught to lock our doors as homo sapiens.
Prior to the events of 9/11, there were many altercations and highjackings of commercial airlines. It should come as no surprise the need to have secure cockpits on planes, buses, and various other operation centers. Moreover, given the current rate of bank robberies, it still astounds me that banks and other businesses that deal in lots of cash are not required to have concave Gorilla glass, concrete and steel enclosed banking areas.
Furthermore, cities large and small around the world have been plagued by thugs and lunatics since the dawn of man. Our societies are not as civilized as we would like think they are.
9/11 has taught us to value quality regulations and law enforcement despite the effort of corporate pirates to completely eradicate law enforcement. Piracy by proxy in the corporate world, as rampant as it is, has taught people to do exactly what the 9/11 terrorist did; send in religious nuts to screw us all. Now the terrorists are trying to pollute our water, air and land. They are also trying to bankrupt us and rob us all in the same breath. Our politicians should really take note as to who is really pulling the strings, organized crime and terrorists.

In early 1964, an analysis was done by WTC building designers, that calculated that the WTC towers could handle the impact of a 707 or DC8 traveling at 600 mph without collapsing. "Such a collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building..."
Between 1984 and 1985, Les Robertson, one of the original structural engineers said, in response to whether the towers would collapse from a bomb or a slow moving airplane. He said that "there is little likelihood of a collapse no matter how the building was attacked."
In 1993, John Skilling, a building designer, recalled his people doing an analysis that found that the twin towers could withstand the impact of a 707. They believed that the fuel would dump into the buildings causing a large fire but "the building structure would still be there."
In 2001, Leslie Robertson, one of the two original structural engineers for the WTC, says that "I designed it for a 707 to smash into it." He also says "The twin towers were in fact the first structures outside the military and nuclear industries designed to resist the impact of a jet airplane."
On Jan 25, 2001:
Frank A. Demartini, the on-site construction manager for the WTC: "The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door--this intense grid--and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting.."
Sept 3-7, 2001:
Just before 911..Roberson again made a statement that the towers would remain standing after a jet-liner crash.
After 911:
Leslie Robertson was not available for comment...said his Manhattan firm..."we are going to hold off on comment".
In 2002:
Leslie Robertson said: "I support the general conclusions of the NIST report. The WTC was designed for the impact of a low flying slow flying Boeing 707. ....it was not designed for a high speed impact from the jets that actually hit it."
So Robertson has made some glaring contradictions. And although he now says that their previous calculations was only done with a low speed crash (600 mph)...he now says 180 mph was used in the original calculations and says nothing about the 600 mph speed they repeatedly said before 911.
Question is...why has Robertson seemingly changed his tune? Was he pressured to reverse his previous statements? Do you now trust what he says now?
This, and much more can be found here:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/210207designers.htm
Watch that documentary I mentioned before at Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth and listen to the testimonies of other Architects and Engineers about the structure of those buildings.

I don't know if 19 Middle Eastern men plunged planes into the towers and the Pentagon and tried to hit the White House. So who in the White House would have worked out this bizarre conspiracy? Was Cheney off in his bunker? And as someone wrote, why were all these Muslim guys taking flying lessons--learning to fly but not to land or any other part of it?
And if our own government was responsible--or let it happen--why? If what they wanted was an excuse for war, why such a bloody act? If war was wanted, it could have been started with a less disastrous event. I find it hard to believe that even Cheney and Rumsfeld could have concoted this--but I don't know. I am also skeptical about all those lone, dysfunctional, unstable gunmen, who were probably not very bright, shooting Jack Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy, and Martin Luther King. And I'm still skeptical that Paul Wellstone's plane with his wife, daughter and several staff members, somehow fell out of the air--although that's what David Wellstone, one son, says. My first thought when I heard that was Cheney was in the mix somewhere.
Maybe Bush sat so long reading My little goat or whatever it was that if there was an American-made conspiracy, nobody told him.
To go back to what we Americans learned or should have learned: We seem to be skeptical about everything. That's probably OK; too many of us just accept the official version of everything that the government and corporate interests want us to believe. And we should never ever go off to war in retribution for even this horrendous act. And we even got the target wrong. What we did is kill several thousand other people, and maim and injure many thousands more, wreck a country or a whole area, and make it harder to ever find a way out of the Middle East mess or these countries to recover.
I don't know if we'll ever know any of that.

The Goats Rue, Its name derives from gale (milk) and ega (to bring on), its French, but native to the Middle East, and Pakistan. Do a wiki. So for Mr. George W. Bush America should bring it on. Ever since watching 911, George Bush as a first responder just sitting, reading a goat story, for about seven minutes after the first plane hit a sense of alarm was within me. But at that time asked myself: Why didn’t Bush get up from his goat story and go after the first initial plane hit. It’s intuitive, one should feel it, Bush knew something was to happen and he waited.
It is not to build the case that Bush conspired, but it is that Bush had the power, and the intelligence system to prevent such a horrible event. It’s the case that Bush let it play out. Intentionally, deliberately, with a future plan that had all the military reasons to take actions at levels as never before. All this should now be considered by a grand jury of separate charges to six separate individuals, Bush, Cheney, Rove, Bolts, Rumsfeld, and Rice. All should be charged with at least minor negligence, or severe treason. We had enough of the Congressional and Senate stuff, it’s Grand Jury time. This is not conspiracy, all the criminal vectors are statistically regressive and they point to all those listed.
When I found out that Bush has a bother that is connected to the insurance company that is contracted for the security equipment in the trade towers it turned into vision like a Cecil B. De Milles wide screen picture of the greatest story ever told. This is bigger than the bible.
Thanks for the reference to the videos. This is the first time I saw them. Which adds to my personal view, Bush knew something awful was going to happen. He, Bush, did nothing to prevent it. Or actually, side tracked events so the tragedy could play out. And what connects the Bush family again to the Arabs is the security company for the towers. Marvin P. Bush, the little-known younger brother of George W. Bush, was a director of Securacom/Stratesec, a Kuwaiti/Saudi-backed company, until June 2000 (A year and three months before 9/11). The company that provided electronic security to the World Trade Center in the days before the attacks and provided security to Dulles International Airport (Where the government says Flight 77 took off from).
http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/911?before=1327269550
On 9/11, Marv Bush was on the board of HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc., which insured parts of the WTC. He is still an adviser to this company. This begs the question. Were there insurance liabilities that could be erased, or stock and bond liabilities that could be written off? It also suggests scandal of treasonous proportions. All covered up by the media.
All a not too difficult an issue for a complete Democratic take over for the Congress and the Senate on grounds that new evidence is compiled from 911 that could involve a cover up in the Bush administration. As an October surprise, offered before the election in that the Congress and Senate need to be Democratic to open and air formal grand jury investigations.
That could carry on for years.

It would be pretty hard to read what Minoru Yamasaki said about 911 as he died in 1986. Of course he may have made statements about the WTC buildings before he died in 1986 but others who participated in the design and building of the WTC buildings were saying that the towers were designed to withstand multiple airline crashes. And as I thought I got across when I showed what Roberson said before 911 and then after 911...some people can be compromised by the powers in the government and in the private sector...like, do you still want contracts?
And the fires caused by the jet fuel and the office fires would not have been hot enough to melt the steel beams....off by about 1000 degrees. And the story that beams would have not had to melt before a structural collapse but just lose a certain percentage of strength still needed much more temperature than from the jet fuel or the office fire. There was, however, visual video evidence that molten steel was poring out of the side of the building (not molten aluminum because molten aluminum does not give off yellow-white colors...molten aluminum looks more like mercury a dullish silvery color.) I have melted aluminum ingots and I have melted bronze ingots. The bronze melts at a much higher temperature than aluminum and steel even higher...although I have never melted steel except in welding...gas and arc.
There was also pools of molten steel in the basements of the buildings. And why was so much dust created, beams and body parts hurled hundreds of feet onto other buildings. Why did they ship those beams out to China so hastily when it would have been cheaper to process them locally.
So if engineers and scientists say that the jet fuel fire and office fires was 1000 degrees below what it would take to melt steel, what caused the molten steel? Nano-thermite?
Nano-thermite is an explosive that can instantly turn steel to a liquid...molten steel.
There is photographic evidence of huge beams cut diagonally...and the edges of the cut was an exact fingerprint of what nano-thermite can do. That is the pattern demolitionists use to cause a building to fall in it's own footprint...straight down. That, along with the evidence of nano-thermite residue and molten steel micro-spheres in abundance in the 4 dust samples taken around the WTC site is pretty conclusive proof that nano-thermite was used, probably along with other explosives, to bring down the towers and building 7.
And even if the upper floors were weakened and buckled the lower floors all the way down to the ground did not experience the same heat as where the plane crashed. So one still has to contend with the fact that the towers and bldg 7 fell at near free fall speed. With the resistance of the lower structure, that would slow down a collapsing building, and would be nowhere near free fall speed. The only way to achieve near free fall speed is to remove the resistance to the downward fall of the upper structure by demolition procedures.

I learned that democracy in America is truly a sham, and that the evil empire, the nation that is the greatest threat to the safety of the world and to the preservation of civilization is America.

Just watch the film Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth. That will explain very clearly with good visuals why it was impossible for the towers to have fallen as they did unless there were explosives planted in each floor to remove any resistance to their free fall.

No, you're a die-hard patriot who refuses to accept the truth that our government is totally corrupted.

What I learned from 9/11 is that we Americans are easily scared and once scared can be led around like sheep.

I believe there were a number of reasons that 911 was carried out..aside from the obvious...excuse to invade the Middle East, control the oil, and as a strategic place for yet more military bases. What, I think, many people are missing is that the neocons and neoliberals had been pillaging us for 30 years...overturning laws that protected us from the ravages of banksters and Wall Street. America was converted from a manufacturing base economy to a finance economy where it was easier to steal our money. Businesses were trying to maximize their short term profits in any way they could...at first, it was reducing wages and benefits and demanding more productivity. Then they started shipping our jobs overseas...and many people had previously bought into the "buy now before it is too late" philosophy in home ownership. The Fed was artificially keeping their rates low...like practically free money to the banks and they would make a killing on higher rates. But the real scam was they made it really easy, initially, for people to buy homes. They even pushed liars loans to many people who really didn't know any better. The increased sales..sellers market...artificially spiked home prices. Then bust...the balloon burst and people lose their homes to the banks.
There were also casino capitalist scams...derivatives, various ponzi schemes.....liars ratings...and then there were all of the illegal bonds that were stored in one of the WTC towers that were to come due on 912 that would have caused a real scandal. Bank vaults inside the WTC towers were cleaned out (note: it would have taken a long time...longer than they had since the 1st airliner crash...to clean out the vaults. There were also many very suspect trades done just prior to the disaster. And then there were the investigations of illegal economic actions by various large corporations that had records stored in the WTC towers and in that side of the Pentagon that got hit. Enron and the others that got caught was just the very tip of the ice berg.
Finally, 911 made people very afraid and extremely, irrationally, xenophobic and jingoistic. Instead of being concerned about the myriad of companies like Enron in line to be prosecuted the people were now concerned about Muslim Terrorists, crop dusters...be sure to tape up those windows and door! There was no longer any resolve, even by those in the know, the investigators, law enforcement, Congress, and apparently even now, Obama, to investigate and prosecute. The pansies are just saying "let's just look to the future and not dwell on the past".
Now they have us where they want us...without the freedoms we had before and spying on us and can even, just like the KGB, abduct us from our homes, send us to Gitmo and torture us. It could happen. It has happened.

"And now those of us who thought we were voting for change and would somehow get to the bottom of what we knew in our heart of hearts was not evil in some axis spanning other parts of the globe, but right before us in Washington DC, now we are left with a gaping disillusionment that increases each day with new reports about this whistleblower, that CIA informant, the newest and latest enemy of the State."
whateverittakes: that's an amazing statement! On this eleventh anniversary of 9/11, you said what I feel better than I could. This is why some people (inaccurately) see no difference between Obama and Bush.

"scandal of treasonous proportions"
That's what I think...exactly! And thanks for posting those connections to the insurance company and to the security of the WTC buildings. I had mentioned them before but forgot their names at that time.
And, you are probably right about Bush...he may have been just a small player in all of this. It may have been way over his head and he just went along, perhaps? And, of course, that goes for Obama, now, as well...way over his head...and he knows it. That may be why Bush looked like the cat that swallowed the canary when reading that goat book...frozen in his tracks. Or, like a "deer caught in the head lights". Like..."oh, sh!t, they really, really did do this after all!" Bush was the President, and as all Presidents seem to take the heat for every bad thing that happens because they are very visible. I think there is a very powerful group (don't even know what to call them...some might have names but I never really got into any of those "conspiracy theories" ;-} )
JFK didn't want to have anything to do with Operation Northwoods and, who knows, may have been part of the reason they terminated him.
I believe that FDR had his conspiracy as well...in the Pearl Harbor attack. Another instance where they decided to bait the enemy and sacrifice thousands in order to control the people. It worked then so well then that the neocons thought it a good idea in planning 911..they already had lots of ideas from Operation Northwoods.

Thanks for that link, whateverittakes! I liked your reference to Raskolnikov in Dostoyevsky's novel Crime and Punishment because that is very similar to how the Bush Administration dealt with 911 except this group is nothing like an impoverished student...they already own most of the world but want more....which makes them even more evil.
But, yes, the Bush administration did everything they could to cover up and prevent an investigation...and then, finally, they rigged up a faux investigation for the purpose of further impeding the truth to the public.

Right on, Tomcalwriter1! I have watched a number of those documentaries and will, no doubt, watch them again. I am glad that most of us have not been hoodwinked by the criminals that have taken over this country...maybe there is still hope. Now, if we can only get Thom Hartmann and others in the media to take a good look at the evidence and brave it out enough to publicly question the government's official conspiracy theory. I bet Abby Martin, of Russia Today would speak out...she is very outspoken...Yay! Abby!

Palindromedary, thanks for this information about how WTC 1 & 2 were designed to withstand the impacts of fully loaded 707s. It serves as a good rebuttal to Ken Ware's assertion in #17. In 1945, a B-25 crashed into the Empire State Building, and it didn't materially dissociate at near free-fall.

hb091666: I believe there is a difference between Bush and Obama in some things...and Obama may even want to do the right thing for America...I can't believe this of Bush or Romney.
I guess it depends on what one means when one says "America", the Ultra-rich America--the 1% (or as Bush bragged before his constituents...his base); or, "America"-- the 99% of people who are suffering under the Draconian and Machiavellian rule of the 1%.
And a large part of that 99% voted for Obama believing in him... just to find that the first thing he does is appoint the very same wolves who destroyed our economy to overlord over it.
He takes a healthcare bill, written in large part by Romney and the insurance companies, and hocks it off as something we should praise him for.
He gets out of Iraq (sort of) but only on the timetable originally agreed to by Bush.
He gives the ok to kill OBL, but not to capture him, and they illegally invaded Pakistan's sovereign space killing several other men along with OBL. Cold blooded murder is Cold Blooded Murder! This should be a war crime and probably is! I've read Matt Bissonette's (come on, now, Fox news already outed the guy) book (chapters 15 & 16) detailing the murder of those men. Very gruesome and was totally unwarranted. I watched Matt Bissonette on 60 minutes and while 60 minutes hypocritically said they would not use his real name (although I thought I heard them say it once during that broadcast) they did mention that a cable channel already outed him...failing to mention Fox...but it was Fox.
Obama continues to murder civilians with his drones in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The US is still there, occupying and murdering people, and creating the atmosphere where hundreds of thousands of people are willing to do jihad against us.
Despite TSA making such ridiculous harassing gestures, taking away mother's baby milk and nail files and groping people...the international flights I was on (every one) gave out stainless steel, sharp, serrated edged dinner knives on international flights going and coming.
And studies have shown that the TSA are not very effective in screening for weapons...as a very high number of weapons have been smuggled past the check points.
It's not the "terrorists" they are trying to catch...it's all about creating the atmosphere of fear...so they can control us...and do it "in our faces" (and crotches)!

Palindromedary: Exactly, as Thom would say, very well said! Abby Martin and Media Roots are fantastic. Ditto RT. At the end of Thom's show today, his response to a caller, who questioned the official account of the building collapses, was that there should be a new investigation. Due to his usual brilliance and erudition, Thom has become one of my heroes, and hearing him say that was so damn vindicating!

hb091666: I believe there is a difference between Bush and Obama in some things...and Obama may even want to do the right thing for America...I can't believe this of Bush or Romney.
I guess it depends on what one means when one says "America", the Ultra-rich America--the 1% (or as Bush bragged before his constituents...his base); or, "America"-- the 99% of people who are suffering under the Draconian and Machiavellian rule of the 1%.
And a large part of that 99% voted for Obama believing in him... just to find that the first thing he does is appoint the very same wolves who destroyed our economy to overlord over it.
He takes a healthcare bill, written in large part by Romney and the insurance companies, and hocks it off as something we should praise him for.
He gets out of Iraq (sort of) but only on the timetable originally agreed to by Bush.
He gives the ok to kill OBL, but not to capture him, and they illegally invaded Pakistan's sovereign space killing several other men along with OBL. Cold blooded murder is Cold Blooded Murder! This should be a war crime and probably is! I've read Matt Bissonette's (come on, now, Fox news already outed the guy) book (chapters 15 & 16) detailing the murder of those men. Very gruesome and was totally unwarranted. I watched Matt Bissonette on 60 minutes and while 60 minutes hypocritically said they would not use his real name (although I thought I heard them say it once during that broadcast) they did mention that a cable channel already outed him...failing to mention Fox...but it was Fox.
Obama continues to murder civilians with his drones in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The US is still there, occupying and murdering people, and creating the atmosphere where hundreds of thousands of people are willing to do jihad against us.
Despite TSA making such ridiculous harassing gestures, taking away mother's baby milk and nail files and groping people...the international flights I was on (every one) gave out stainless steel, sharp, serrated edged dinner knives on international flights going and coming.
And studies have shown that the TSA are not very effective in screening for weapons...as a very high number of weapons have been smuggled past the check points.
It's not the "terrorists" they are trying to catch...it's all about creating the atmosphere of fear...so they can control us...and do it "in our faces" (and crotches)! Next? Cavity searches?...now won't that be fun?
Oh, but wait! That already happened to one poor woman who told her story on Wordsmith. She was half Palestinian sitting next to two Indian men on the plane flying into Phoenix. They stopped the plane on the tarmac and dozens of cops with powerful weapons boarded the plane...told everyone to put their heads down and their hands on top of the seat in front. They then handcuffed the woman and the two Indian men and put each one in a dirty 4'x6' cell with a filthy toilet. She suffered the indignity of temporary imprisonment, repeated questioning, and they did a cavity search on her. They let her go and she went home to her awaiting husband.

Palindromedary: Excellent summary, to me that's the crux of the 9/11 Truth argument. Debunk that ye motherfuckers.

hb091666: You're welcome! Yes, there have been many buildings either having been hit by aircraft or on fire. Some fires were really terrible...much more terrible than the WTC buildings yet they didn't collapse. The thing is that the debunkers would say that the WTC building was mostly built of steel and had much less concrete to act as a fire barrier which would protect the steel beams and provide more rigidity. That's true. However, the steel beams in the WTC did have asbestos insulation as a protection from fire. As a matter of fact the asbestos was part of the reason why it made some people very happy that the buildings came down. It would have cost a fortune to remove that asbestos and replace it with a different insulation. It really was a nightmare waiting to happen..legal wise and health wise. 911 solved a lot of problems for a lot of people...especially Silverstein.
But, even if the upper floors did collapse...there is just no way that the buildings could fall straight down at free fall speed like that unless demolitions were used. It is a matter of do you believe in physics and science or do you believe in magic? NIST wants us all to believe in magic...or at least their dumb conspiracy theory. Both the WTC towers and the WTC 7 building came straight down in their foot prints. And how can that be when the planes hit the building on one side and the WTC7 fire was on one side. Why would they not have tilted or broken off and come down to their sides?
Now there is one thing that could be possible...that the buildings were built with explosives already planted...or at least planted some time after they were built. The thought here would be similar to the rocket launches...they can be detonated if they look like they are flying off course and can hit a populated area. It could be that many tall buildings, in order to keep them from falling over and wiping out a lot of other buildings full of people, can be detonated to fall in it's foot print. If this was the case, then I sure wouldn't want to be working in any of those buildings. And it might be that they sure don't want people to know about this. But, the problem with that idea is that explosives get temperamental and unstable with age..and they may not do this because of that.
But, of course, the most likely scenario is that they planted the explosives in the months and weeks prior to 911.

Palindromedary: Scary. In terms of U.S.--us--policy, we are truly stuck with a lesser of evils choice on election day. Obama's unwavering capitulation to the dictates of the War of Terror has unfortunately caused some folks to turn to the strange promises of the good friend of the KKK and Neo-Nazis: Ron Paul. I guess Gary Johnson is carrying the Libertarian torch now; I don't know anything about him but, given his party, I assume he's an asshole.

hb091666: Hey, thanks! I missed today's show wearing out my fingers typing. I'll catch it on the internet. Glad to hear it! Thom is really great but I sometimes think he's trying to convince us to vote for Obama (what?!..no kidding?!)...and there is nothing wrong with that if he truly believes that Obama is what is best for us (yes, he certainly would be better than Romney for sure) but I have a more sinister belief that both parties, hence, both candidates are really useful idiots for the ruling elite. Obama may want to do things for the 99% (but, I don't know... he sure doesn't act like it sometimes) but he may have no other choice. For all I know, after candidate Obama won the election the first time, they may have sat him down and told him how things were going to be ...or else. Would they do the same to Jill Stein? Probably! Would Jill Stein be scared into submitting to their dictates? Now, that would be one brave lady..but I'm sure Cheri Honkala could whoop their a$$!

Palindromedary: I like your alternative designed-in explosives hypothesis. When the physical truth of the WTC collapses hit my Dad's consciousness, he instinctively improvised the same hypothesis: talk about a major secret! ;) Yes, even given the overwhelming unlikelihood of their occurrences, gravitational collapses would yield dramatically different debris fields than those of WTC 1, 2 & 7: there would be remnants that are somewhat intact. Besides the melted steel, most of the rest of the contents of those buildings were pulverized to micron sized dust during the collapses. Gravity doesn't provide the energy to do that.

hb091666: Yes, scary, indeed! Well, if you want to continue voting for the entrenched two-party system..yes, I guess you're stuck with the lessor of two evils. We could vote for an angel...(Jill Stein)...but I don't really know how angelic she really is. She is Jewish but I don't know how attached she would be to the political faction that has control over America now. Some Jews are not the Zionist ones that carry out a form of Apartheid against the Palestinians. Many Jews hate what the radical Israeli government is doing in Palestine (Israel). But her messages are very compelling...just as compelling as Obama was when he campaigned the first time. I just don't think I can vote for Obama again because it would be a vote for the corrupt two party system that is ruled by the oligarchy. I would love to see that two party system thrown out on it's trunk and a$$ just to show them that they don't have us all down to a one or the other choice.
I really don't know much about the Libertarian candidate either. I do know that there used to be two different kinds of Libertarian...liberal ones, believe it or not...they just objected to the government's intrusion into their personal lives...then the conservative ones who want to privatize everything. I think that the later is the one that is usually believed to be dominant and, in my opinion, is as evil as Republicans.

hb091666: What a coincidence! ie: your dad having the same hypothesis. I didn't even read that anywhere just thought of it as a possibility. Interesting. Does your dad also frequently, like all the time, glance at the clock and see 1:11 or 11:11 or 2:22 or 3:33 etc? It's really freaky! Happens with other things too...receipts and other things. But then I heard from a friend that her friend kept seeing 2:22 all the time too and she died recently, unexpectedly. I sure hope that is not an omen. Not that I believe in such things, of course, nor that what I am experiencing is really out of the ordinary...I don't know...maybe it happens to a lot of people and has absolutely no meaning at all...probably. But, it's freaky just the same!
Yes, I know what you mean about the debris fields of a gravitational collapse versus a demolition. I would not expect a gravitational collapse to hurl huge heavy steel beams hundreds of feet. And all of that dust would not likely have come from just a gravitational collapse...as you say...much of that building, other than the steel beams, was pulverized...except of course, a passport that belonged to one of the alleged hijackers. Imagine that! And just watching the buildings come down...watching the squibs shooting out with such force just milliseconds prior to and several floors beneath the collapse point...man, they looked like explosions.

hb091666: And gravity (here on Earth anyway) doesn't melt steel as it would have had to do in order to remove the resistance to free fall that the supporting under structure would have done...because the fire did not light up the whole building..it was localized. The under structure would have been fully intact and resisting free fall.

And there were rescuers up inside the WTC towers right up to the moment they started to collapse...the really hot fires were all localized to the few floors where the planes crashed and they weren't hot enough to melt steel or to even weaken steel to any significant degree. These buildings were designed to take a crash (or even several crashes) of airliners along with the anticipated fires that would ensue. And if those fires would have been hot enough to even weaken the steel then all of the designers, architects, and engineers who had made many statements that the buildings wouldn't come down were either incompetent or lying. And the WTC chief designer, Minoru Yamasaki, would, perhaps, have been the most incompetent. But, I don't think they were lying or incompetent. I believe the WTC buildings came down by demolition. The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond is built almost the same structural design except almost half of the building is underground.

21 comments! I beat you! I win! Goodnight!
None is so blind as he who refuses to see... The evidence is overwhelming that 9/11 was something entirely other than what our government wants us to believe. That fact in and of itself is damning. But what is more damning is the slowness of the American people, the absence of a vital press to stand up and question, to ask for the truth in the face of the patriotic pablum we were given, the distortion and lies. We had such a press once; Watergate is now part of our history. We should have a 9/11gate but we have no one, apparently, in the journalistic field with sufficient guts to stand up and say: Wait a minute! I agree with the person here who wrote: Shame on you, Thom! Shame on Bill Moyers! And I will add Shame on the NYT and every other news organ and commentator whose business it is to inform the American people and to have sufficient integrity to question nonsense.

Palindromedary: I'm neither a physicist nor a chemist. Nonetheless, what is the explanation of the presence of molten metal many weeks after the event?! Where did that energy come from, just nano-thermite? Unless you have answers, those questions are rhetorical. The burning vehicles phenomenon is also very strange. And I'm not a Judy Wood acolyte.

hb091666: I don't know the answer to that either. I had read that there were pools of molten metal underground...in the sub levels...several weeks after 911 and it hampered the rescuers and workers from doing their jobs. Even IRAS? satellite photos were taken and the site analyzed weeks later and it showed extremely high temperatures.
Yes, I am aware of the Judy Wood theory...I believe her theory was that the towers were zapped from a space station we have in orbit...particle beam weapons. Lawrence Livermore Labs were experimenting with particle beam weapons. But, I know that, in the company I used to work for that made capital equipment for making integrated circuit chips that they had a laser annealer that used a very powerful laser beam and it was very big and heavy...I don't know about particle beam weapons but I imagine they would be pretty heavy and bulky and require an awful lot of power. I can't imagine that they would ever be able to operate in space. Of course, now, if they had some kind of satellite mirror system that could redirect a beam originating on Earth to be aimed and redirected to a target on Earth then maybe it is possible. But I think it is kind of far fetched...really.
There is also some Russian guy who has a theory about miniature atomic bombs being planted in the WTC...I find that pretty incredulous as well. I think all of the real evidence points to nano-thermite combined with conventional explosives.
Incidentally, I understand that Lawrence Livermore Labs was instrumental in creating nano-thermite about 10 years before 911. The nano-thermite chips that was found in the dust and the description of them just made me think of how integrated circuits are made on silicon wafers...different layers could be spun up on a silicon wafer and masked using micro-photolithography and then cut into tiny dies... then they could be suspended in a gel for uniform dispersal and finalized into nano-thermite that could be handled and shaped into a charge. Really creepy to think that I may have helped make some of this possible. And all those chips that go into drones...just kinda ticks me off. Here I thought I was helping to make integrated circuits for the betterment of mankind...like cell phones...I hate cell phones!
I believe that many of these conspiracy theories...especially the wackier ones...are actually disinformation ploys that try to destroy, by association, any theory competing with the official one. It sure seems to work pretty good for them because they still have a lot of people fooled....and too afraid to challenge the official stories.

The last 4 years have been wonderful! I'm voting for 4 more--not to go back to the 8 previous, which is where Romney is likely to take us. He's the same kind of dimwhit who will have evil minions make ALL the decisions while he golfs, or whatever he does for leisure, like destroy companies and US jobs while he socks more US money away in the Caymans, draining the US economy of capital.
I have been reading Al Gore's Assault on Reason. It's a terrible reminder of how truely awful the Bush & Co years were. Sometimes I stop reading because all that trauma comes back.
There are far too many funny/awful/strange things about 9/11. The demolition-like collapse of the towers and Building 7, how long it took to investigate, the lies that led to invading Iraq, the torture of innocent people--come on, if Bush & Co really wanted to get bin Laden, they would have.
Why aren't these people facing treason charges, at least, and murder, at most?
- 1
- 2
- >
- »
It wasn't the "failure" of the Bush Administration to "prevent" the attacks. The Bush Regime and the Neocons and Neoliberals and other partner countries, were behind the attacks and committed treason against this country. If you really want to honor the victims of 911, you should question the authorities in power that refused to do a proper investigation and did all they could to obfuscate the facts. I'll save you from a list of the glaring details that would more than convict most criminals. You've probably heard them before and some of you will probably ignore them again. Unless you really check out all of the facts as shown on the many web sites like Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth then you will never understand what really happened on 911 and you will continue to swallow the official, government 911 conspiracy theory...from the same government that many of you will berate, otherwise, for many other things.
Watch the 1 hour (free version) documentary: 9/11: Explosive Evidence-Experts Speak Out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ddz2mw2vaEg
Then check out:
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/home.html