Tanks aren't the only way to support an economy.

Sequester cuts are hitting vital programs like Meals on Wheels, Head Start, and cancer treatment centers. So, it's difficult to understand why Congress would be pushing to spend $436 million on tanks that the Army says it does not need. According to Congress, keeping the production line of tanks rolling is important to jobs and supporting businesses in Lima, Ohio, where the tanks are manufactured. But the Army chief of staff says, “If we had our choice, we would use that money in a different way.”
The military must absorb $487 billion in sequester cuts over the next decade, and like various other programs effected by the cuts, they're finding it difficult to figure out where that money will come from. Reducing the production of tanks they don't need seems to be a reasonable cut. But, Lima Mayor David Berger says the plant is the city's fifth-largest employer, and closing the factory would have “about a $100 million impact annually.”
Once again, we see a prime example of how Republican austerity destroys economies. There's no question that it's foolish to be building tanks our military doesn't need, but without economic investment in that region, there may not be other jobs available for that plant's employees. And, as the sequester has also forced cuts to vital programs like unemployment aid, housing assistance, and nutritional programs, people who find themselves out of work will find it even more difficult to get by.
Instead of arguing with the military about whether or not the tanks are needed, Congress should be investing in Lima, Ohio, and creating new jobs for plant employees to turn to. While they're at it, they should also reverse the Republican austerity measures hitting children, seniors, and cancer patients in our nation. Let's demand that Congress put an end to the now-debunked austerity theory and start putting people back to work. Join the fight at No-Cuts.com.
Comments

Thanks for the info. Sounds like something I need to know when my warranty expires.



chuckle8: Mine is a Panasonic also. 1250 Watts Inverter
model nn-sn785s. The 3 door switches are inside of a plastic mount assembly that clips onto a thin tin flange that emerges out from the front and extends toward the rear. The rear of the tin flange is not attached to anything and the flange easily bends back and forth at the rear when the door is closed and opened. So, the whole plastic switch mount assembly moved as the door was opened and closed. When I closed the door, the internal light would not turn off, like it was supposed to, and it would not operate. I found, initially, that if I shut the door very, very hard...slamming the door shut...it would operate until the next time.
So, I drilled the hole, into the front and into the plastic switch assembly mount and put a screw in to draw the assembly up tight against the front. This prevented the switch assembly from moving when I shut the door. I looked for any evidence of broken plastic but there was nothing broken..no pieces of plastic inside the MW. My conclusion was that this was a very poor design. The tin wall would be fairly rigid when new and would work until the tin wall flexed many times and would eventually bend out of shape. Actually, the first time I tried to fix this problem I tried to just bend the tin wall so that the switch assembly would work...but it didn't stay fixed...so I put the screw in and it has fixed the problem.