Daily Topics - Thursday February 20th, 2014

Catch The Thom Hartmann Program LIVE 3-6pm ET M-F!!
Read Thom's latest Liberally Yours column online at The Daily Caller..be sure to add your comments & support your local liberal!
Hour One: Our looming judicial crisis - Mike Papantonio, Ring of Fire Radio
Hour Two: Scott Walker...WI's Christie moment - John Nichols, The Nation Magazine / Plus, Geeky Science - How your plastic water bottle could be killing you
Hour Three: Obama's fast track push - Lori Wallach, Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch / Plus, time for white Americans to wake the hell up - Jason Roberts, Simple Misfits
Comments


I'm not sure, since your question runs on a bit. However, I read that Al Roker felt it necessary to point out that the term "polar vortex" had been in use for at least 50 years, and therefore is not a propaganda term invented by climate scientists to scare people. The polar vortex by itself is not a shutdown of the Gulf Stream, nor would it cause such a shutdown so far as I know. It might even delay it, by cooling Greenland.
Hurricanes, typhoons and polar vortices are all just types of cyclones. Hurricanes occur in the north Atlantic, typhoons in the north Pacific and polar vortices are centered in the Arctic.



Is what's happening with the polar vortex the same thing scientists talked about 10 yrs ago and the Gulf Stream Conveyor belt and shutting it down because of too much regular water mixing with salt water and stopping the Conveyor belt?