Comments

Rodger97321's picture
Rodger97321 12 years 8 weeks ago
#1

A thought on the Cell-Phone Ruling:

My first reaction was that the 5 that suddently decided to vote properly were just concerned about the porn on their devices being discovered after a traffic stop, but I think it goes deeper.

The reality of the ruling is just that it has been clarified that technically, in "most" cases, a warrant needs to be obtained and the inference is that warrants are not easy to obtain.

Unlike so many other rulings by SCOTUS dealing with "privacy" (which the Corporate Media give little coverage to) - this ruling gets big headlines and more airtime than all those erosions of our rights.

Now why would that be?

My conclusion is that the (substitute the 3-letters of your choice) have noticed a decrease in the amount of personal / potentially embarassing or incriminating information being stored by people on their electronic devices since Mr. Snowden's whistleblowing began a year ago.

This ruling, although proper in itself, is intended to lull users back into a false sense of security about how cavlier they can be with how they use their electronic devices.

SueN's picture
SueN 12 years 8 weeks ago
#2

Interesting theory. Time will tell.

I suspect that a lot of people were not paying attention, and have not reduced their storage of data, but maybe the people that matter have.

Become a Thom Supporter



Thom's Latest Book





Thom Hartmann Program

Live: Mon-Fri
Noon - 3pm Eastern
Live TV | Podcast

Syndicated by Pacifica, and simulcast on Free Speech TV Network on Dish Network and DirectTV, on radio stations, and Sirius/XM, more people listen to or watch the Thom Hartmann program than any other progressive talk show in the world.


Thom On Your Mobile Device